Originally Posted by alexg

Funny that you should try to paint Obama as a Nazi. When it's your hero George W. Bush that has the real nazi in his family tree. Maybe that's why you're all so upset. Afraid you may have to say sieg heil to someone else? You don't need to worry, Obama's not a megalomaniacal scum-bag like Bush.

Bush and the Nazis: New Documents
Herbert Parmet, November 26, 2003

Editor's Note: For the past couple of months, we've been corresponding with a Florida-based freelance journalist named John Buchanan. In October, Buchanan began publishing a series of articles documenting the Bush dynasty patriarch's business deals with Nazi-era businesses. This summer, Buchanan discovered newly declassified documents in the National Archives that he claims shows Prescott Bush (seen in photo), the president's grandfather, was more connected to Nazi Germany than had previously been known. He broke the story in the New Hamsphire Gazette, a small, fiercely independent newspaper founded by the current publisher's ancestor in 1756. But when Buchanan began to reach out to mainstream news organizations, his story was ignored. The Associated Press ran an article, but it largely discounted the new findings' significance. Buchanan went on the offensive, sending belligerent emails to news organizations that refused to investigate (he's something of a loose canon), and has launched a campaign to run for President of the United States on the Republican ticket to publicize his findings (as I said, he's something of a loose canon). Buchanan argues that only through investigating Prescott Bush's connections to the Nazis can we fully understand the Bush family fortune and the true nature of their political legacy. Does the story hold up? Even if it does, can you hold the son to blame for the sins of the father (or grandfather, in this case)? Recently our new friends at George Mason University's History News Network asked noted historian Herbert Parmet to investigate. This is his report


http://www.illuminati-news.com/bush-...onnection.html

Originally Posted by JMS

obama is the potus, guys. the race is over.

Originally Posted by kscott13

I'm sure they would do the same thing if it was McCain.

Originally Posted by Spare

There is no man safer in Iraq than Barak H. Obama.

Both sides want to keep him alive, albeit for different reasons.

Originally Posted by MidwestMax

Nope. McCain has been to Iraq on several occassions. A few pool reporters wer ein his detail, but that's it. Obama has all three major news anchors detailing every time he goes to the airplane bathroom. As far as the drive by media is concerned, Obama is the heir apparent.

Originally Posted by JP5

I agree. Never in all my life have I EVER seen a nominee for president get treated as if he's already the President in the way Obama is getting treated right now. According to the liberal mainstream press, there is no reason to even hold the election in November. I always thought the media/press was supposed to be at least somewhat objective and fair in their treatments of "candidates." But NOT this time. NO tv network Anchors traveled with McCain to the Middle East and certainly not 60 journalists. And certainly NOT all the photo ops that Obama is being provided. Obama has truly been "annointed" already by the media/press.

Originally Posted by MidwestMax

Nope. McCain has been to Iraq on several occassions. A few pool reporters were in his detail, but that's it. Obama has all three major news anchors detailing every time he goes to the airplane bathroom. As far as the drive by media is concerned, Obama is the heir apparent.

Originally Posted by kscott13

You didn't see the original post in which the OP was mad that a banner was being shown on the CNN website saying Obama landed in Iraq. Fox ran a banner too. That's what I was referring to.