Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 07:40 AM
catzmeow's Avatar
catzmeow catzmeow is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Florida
Age: 42
Posts: 13,970
usa us florida
catzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 70,789
Send a message via Yahoo to catzmeow
Default They're already playing the game this year...

First, insinuating that FDLE acted inappropriately in interviewing elderly black voters in a voter fraud issue involving the Buddy Dyer campaign in Orlando (they didn't). This issue was covered by a series of very irresponsible and fact-light pieces by Bob Herbert in the NYT.
Pieces, that by the way, ignored the fact that the original complaints that sparked the investigation were made by black voters, and that the mainly white Firefighters Union was also under investigation for vote buying.

Secondly, insinuating that blacks were "harassed" by red light patrols in intersections in Tallahassee, a heavily DEMOCRATIC county with a Democrat as sheriff.

For the record, there were TWO speed traps in MY LARGELY WHITE NEIGHBORHOOD the day of the election.

Perhaps the Dems were attempting to suppress the WHITE vote.

Catz
__________________
Ich bin ein lesbian.

************************************************** ***
Bugalugs: "
people join the military because they are stupid and gullible."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 08:29 AM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,034
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 132,638
Default I don't understand

http://www.ffrd.org/indochina/camele...oridamodel.htm
"Statewide, based upon county-level statistical estimates, black voters were nearly 10 times more likely than nonblack voters to have their ballots rejected.
Estimates indicate that approximately 14.4 percent of Floridas black voters cast ballots that were rejected. This compares with approximately 1.6 percent of nonblack Florida voters who did not have their presidential votes counted.
Statistical analysis shows that the disparity in ballot spoilage ratesi.e., ballots cast but not countedbetween black and nonblack voters is not the result of education or literacy differences. This conclusion is supported by Governor Jeb Bushs Select Task Force on Election Procedures, Standards and Technology, which found that error rates stemming from uneducated, uninformed, or disinterested voters account for less than 1 percent of the problems."


When I vote, I give my name and I'm given a ballot. Poll workers do not see or touch my ballot again. Obviously, I would not be given a ballot if my name was not on the list. If a ballot was ultimately thrown out, no one could possibly know if it was mine or not. I don't understand why a ballot already cast would be rejected unless it was improperly filled out (or punched). I also do not understand how they could know anything about the person who cast such a ballot.
__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 08:40 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 22,121
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 145,603
Default Telling it like it is

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
That's BS. They tried to prove it afterwards.....and never could. The best they had was a story from a lady who said....."Well, I was driving up to the polling place and saw a cop car parked in the lot where I was supposed to vote and that scared me." And then there was the guy who said, "They had to make some phone call because they said I wasn't registered." But when asked if he was allowed to vote after the phone call was made....he said 'yes.' I listened to those civil rights hearings....and it was pathetic.
So, all the people who claim that they were not allowed to vote even though they were registered and NOT felons were lying? I wonder if you would automatically believe what those in charge said if they had declared Gore the winner? I believe you would feel quite differently if instead of blacks not being able to vote, it had been some "good 'ol boys" who tried to vote for Bush unsuccessfully. The point I am trying to make is that the whole process seemed shady and what seems clear (even by the Republicans running the state) is that a lot of people were "mistakenly" disenfranchised.
Where are "all these people?" Even the Civil Rights organization couldn't find any for their testimony at their hearings. Just because there was a list that had some incorrect information on it, doesn't mean those people on the list even tried to vote. There's no proof of it. And where are you getting information about "blacks?" Are you saying all felons are black and therefore if the list had some names that didn't belong on it, that they had to be black?" HAD there been people...black or white....that were denied a vote, the Civil Rights organization would have had no problems finding them. You cannot make such an accusation with no proof.

Quote:
You want to talk disenfranchisement? What about the liberal press announcing Gore the winner of Florida....EARLY....before the strong Republican counties had completed voting even?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
[News outlets always try to get the "scoop" and even if they announced it prematurely, that didn't stop anyone from voting so it isn't disenfranchisement. And, you seem to forget that all of the major news outlets ALSO announced that Bush was the winner prematurely. I guess you would not have a problem with that, though. The fact is that news outlets ALWAYS announce winners (even in close elections) early.
I'm talking about the early call for Gore BEFORE the polls and voting was even done. No telling how many people standing in line heard that and just decided to go home. Funny that you think that is an acceptable "excuse" and not done on purpose...and yet don't give the benefit of the doubt when it's the other way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
[
Quote:
Was that to make some of them get out of line and go on home?
They may have announced the winner before the ballots were counted, but they didn't (to my knowledge) announce it before the polls were closed. And, even if they did, that didn't stop anyone from voting so, again, it isn't disenfranchisement.
Again...you don't know that. And YES, they DID announce Gore the winner BEFORE all the polls were closed. And YES, it could be called disenfranchisement. IF you can claim that a list of felons that had some erroneous information on it (not because of anything the officials of Florida did) resulted in disenfranchisement with no proof.....nobody who ever came forward and said, "My name was on there and they wouldn't let me vote" then I can do the same.

Quote:
And what about the voters from NY who also registered and voted in Florida? The vast majority of those voters were Democrat? What about Gore choosing to recount ONLY the strong Democrat counties on the recount?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
[And, I am sure that if Gore was declared the winner, Bush would not have done the same thing, right? The point is that if more Gore votes had been "found," Bush would have probably had the right to select a few counties to recount. Gore was looking out for his interests and Bush was watching out for his. The problem is that it seems that Harris, Bush, and the Conservative members of the SCOTUS were also looking out for Bush. Now, I can be wrong about that, but that is my belief. A person (Harris) so close to the election should NOT have had a role in the Bush Campaign.
And I could say that there shouldn't have been so many Democrat judges and polling officials running the election either. I could say that it should be the Democrat official who designed the Butterfly ballot that should have gotten the blame. And NO....I do not think that had it been the other way around, Bush would have been so partisan as to say, "Let's just recount my counties." I could also say that the liberal Florida Supreme Court shouldn't have changed the rules in the middle of an election and tried to assist Gore as they did. Even their Chief Justice....also a liberal....in his Dissenting Opinion...told them all they were breaking laws.....

Quote:
What about Gore trying to deny the military their votes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
[He claimed that some of the ballots were late and under florida law, late ballots are not allowed to be counted. Should he have ignored the legitimate law?
Actually what he did was to look for "technicalities" to try and deny the military overseas votes. Something that Florida had ALWAYS allowed in the past, Gore decided should be denied for THIS election. Again.....trying to change the practice and rules in the middle of an electin for his benefit.

Quote:
I have NO DOUBTS that the Dems will try some funny stuff again this November. NO DOUBTS whatsoever. I'm sure it's already in the works.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
[You know JP5, I have no doubt that you are an intelligent person, but you have tunnel vision. I mean, you don't have to be fair and balanced, so to speak, if you don't want to, but the constant Bush support and the concomitant Democrat attacks get really old really fast. I may not always be right, but at least I don't close my mind and act as a cheerleader for "my team." You should try not doing that sometime.
[/quote] I can prove to you that they are setting up challenges already. They continually complain about the new machines.....even though they had 4 years to get what they wanted and tons of money has been spent on the state-of-the-art voting methods. They are putting lawyers in certain polling places. Were that the other way around, Dems would be yelling, "Intimidation and Disenfranchisement." You've got Kerry out there already putting out the claim that blacks will be denied a vote. These are ALL things they are doing in advance to set up a challenge IF it's close and in Bush's favor. That's not having "tunnel vision." That's just telling it like it is.
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 08:51 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 22,121
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 145,603
Default You care about who the terrorists want?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
No, no, Senax. This is planned. This is what they do EVERY election. It's how they try to get the blacks to turn out to vote. It's.....let's get 'em angry....get 'em mad.....and that will motivate them to get out and vote. And don't mind if they do have to lie......
The problem is that they weren't lying. But, you may be right about the "get 'em mad so they come out to vote" strategy. It is a lot like the "scare the crap out of the American people so they re-elect the "war president" instead of the guy who all the terrorists want to be president.
But one is real...and the other one isn't. I let you guess which of the two.....disenfranchisement of blacks or terrorism.....is real. Some of the images you saw on tv this past week-end might give you a clue.

And you just gave the best reason NOT to vote for John Kerry......because he's ........."[i]the guy who all the terrorists want to be president[/i]." Why do you think the terrorist want Kerry? Because Bush has been hard on them; and because they believe Kerry will not be.
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 08:56 AM
catzmeow's Avatar
catzmeow catzmeow is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Florida
Age: 42
Posts: 13,970
usa us florida
catzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond reputecatzmeow has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 70,789
Send a message via Yahoo to catzmeow
Default Black vote suppression...

or local stupidity?

Quote:
So, all the people who claim that they were not allowed to vote even though they were registered and NOT felons were lying?
Perhaps you don't understand how the felon list works in Florida. Under state law, felons are prohibited from voting. In 1998, Florida privatized the creation of the felon list, which had previously been done manually at the local level in hopes of making the process more efficient. The private company who compiled the list forwarded the list to state elections officials, who forwarded this list to local county elections supervisors, WHO ARE REQUIRED BY LAW to check the list for accuracy.

In some counties, the elections supervisors DID NOT FOLLOW THE LAW, and some people (WHITE AND BLACK) were denied the opportunity to vote.

If this was an attempt to suppress the black vote, it was certainly the lamest attempt at a secret conspiracy EVER.

I don't like Jeb! much, but he's not that stupid. If he had a plot, it would be carried off better than this.

Catz
__________________
Ich bin ein lesbian.

************************************************** ***
Bugalugs: "
people join the military because they are stupid and gullible."
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 08:59 AM
JP5's Avatar
JP5 JP5 is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 22,121
us texas
JP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond reputeJP5 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 145,603
Default Nobody gets disenfranchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by catzmeow";p=&quot View Post
First, insinuating that FDLE acted inappropriately in interviewing elderly black voters in a voter fraud issue involving the Buddy Dyer campaign in Orlando (they didn't). This issue was covered by a series of very irresponsible and fact-light pieces by Bob Herbert in the NYT.
Pieces, that by the way, ignored the fact that the original complaints that sparked the investigation were made by black voters, and that the mainly white Firefighters Union was also under investigation for vote buying.

Secondly, insinuating that blacks were "harassed" by red light patrols in intersections in Tallahassee, a heavily DEMOCRATIC county with a Democrat as sheriff.

For the record, there were TWO speed traps in MY LARGELY WHITE NEIGHBORHOOD the day of the election.

Perhaps the Dems were attempting to suppress the WHITE vote.

Catz
I don't know about all other states, but in Texas, one gets to vote no matter what. In other words, if someone comes in, doesn't appear to be registered or whatever......WE STILL LET THEM VOTE. I know, because I worked the 2002 election in my precinct. There was a short form they had to fill out and sign....and their ballots were placed in a separate box to be investigated later by county officials. This only happened about 3 times, but they were allowed to vote anyway.
__________________
"This is a time for a national imperative not to fail in Iraq." Condoleeza Rice, January 11, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 09:09 AM
britogal britogal is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 349
britogal is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,276
Default Waaaaaaaaaa....cry me a river

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJO34";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimholcomb";p=&quot View Post
If you are talking about cops pulling over people on the way to the polls in democratic areas where the local government is democratic they need to talk to their own folks about that.

If you are talking about people to (*)(*)(*)(*) stupid to figure a ballot out - then they don't need to be voting in the first place - or even driving for that matter.

There was never any suppression of voting.
I was actually referring to the so-called scrub lists. Whether the "problems" with the ballots and scrub lists and recounts, etc. were voter fraud or simply incompetence by a state government is anyone's guess, but the stench of impropriety was strong and I have often wondered if Bush's brother wasn't governor and if Scalia wasn't such a close friend to Cheney, would Gore have won Florida? I don't know and indeed no one does. What I do know is that a LOT of people were wrongfully denied their vote and that isn't, shall we say, the American way.

Well I live in California and my vote won't count...I am caucasion and I am a minority here...Kerry will win this state and my Bush vote won't matter...I am going to vote anyways but you won't hear me whining and moaning about it....it's the way it is...why do people complain so much, good grief!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 09:22 AM
Sinanju Sinanju is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,075
Sinanju is on a distinguished road
Credits: 21,549
Default like i said last time...

This year, when those liberal activists head to the homeless shelter and retirement homes to truck voters to the election, tell those activists to not inform their carpool buddies to vote for Kerry... tell em to hit the third button of punch the third hole....

remember many of those homeless people are barely literate and/or to inebriated to read... and those old people have bad eyesight and shaky hands.... you may want to go into the booths with them this time!

**edit**
forgot something... this year if you vote in your home state of New York... don't vote again in Florida... those (*)(*)(*)(*) Bushies decided to actually start checking on you guys...
__________________
I was banned from godlike productions... and loved it.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 01:32 PM
PJO34's Avatar
PJO34 PJO34 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: N.Y.C.
Posts: 5,022
usa us new york
PJO34 will become famous soon enough
Credits: 34,865
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5";p=&quot View Post
Where are "all these people?" Even the Civil Rights organization couldn't find any for their testimony at their hearings. Just because there was a list that had some incorrect information on it, doesn't mean those people on the list even tried to vote. There's no proof of it. And where are you getting information about "blacks?" Are you saying all felons are black and therefore if the list had some names that didn't belong on it, that they had to be black?" HAD there been people...black or white....that were denied a vote, the Civil Rights organization would have had no problems finding them. You cannot make such an accusation with no proof.
During the recount in 2000, I remember watching CNN interview people who had been denied their right to vote. What you mean by no civil rights organization being able to find these people makes no sense. CNN found these people. The people didn't, shall we say, suffer in silence.

Quote:
I'm talking about the early call for Gore BEFORE the polls and voting was even done. No telling how many people standing in line heard that and just decided to go home. Funny that you think that is an acceptable "excuse" and not done on purpose...and yet don't give the benefit of the doubt when it's the other way.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear the news speculate about who people were voting for based on exit polls, but with no access to the election results, I doubt that CNN or anyone else would announce a winner. And, even if they did, a person would have to be STUPID to believe them. Are you sure that what you are talking about isn't exit polls? Because if it was exit polls, that is pretty common. If not, would you link to a story about CNN calling the election for Bush while the polls were still open?

Quote:
IF you can claim that a list of felons that had some erroneous information on it (not because of anything the officials of Florida did) resulted in disenfranchisement with no proof.....
Every mistake was not just some "erroneous information." Every mistake was a person who was disenfranchised. Stop trying to make it sound as if the only problem was that the names were misspelled.

Quote:
Actually what he did was to look for "technicalities" to try and deny the military overseas votes. Something that Florida had ALWAYS allowed in the past, Gore decided should be denied for THIS election. Again.....trying to change the practice and rules in the middle of an electin for his benefit.
Oh my God...he wanted to follow the law. How dirty of him.

Quote:
I can prove to you that they are setting up challenges already. They continually complain about the new machines.....even though they had 4 years to get what they wanted and tons of money has been spent on the state-of-the-art voting methods.
If you are referring to the touch screen ballots, then we should all be concerned. It has been proven that they are easily hackable and with no paper receipts, no recount will be possible.
__________________
"George W. Bush surrounds himself with smart people the way a hole surrounds itself with a donut." —Dennis Miller
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2004, 02:57 PM
Buckley's Avatar
Buckley Buckley is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 83
Buckley is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,975
Default READ THE REPORT!

Stop arguing and read the report. All the answers are right there. That means you JP5....

http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps1...3588/exsum.htm

Read it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden