Who the hell cares whether Obama, or Palin, or anybody for that matter, uses a Teleprompter? I certainly don't. As far as I'm concerned, it's a non issue.

Will McCain be able to control his legendary temper?
In the event that his blood pressure does go up too much, will Palin be able to do more than parrot his foreign policy stances?

I could give a (*)(*)(*)(*) if Obama needs his staff to give him queues on policy. Part of understanding policy is knowing when you need to rely on experts rather than blind ideology.

__________________
That information is classified and to be given only on a need-to-know basis...

And I do not need to know.

The spin is beautiful but the beauty is just covering up an ugly truth. Obama has no inner virtue, he is just a walking talking liberal tool. He has to rely on what he has been taught or brainwashed, he has no experience to draw from and no wisdom, only memorized rhetoric.

See here for the ugliness seeping to the front of the beauty: Obama eloquently portrays his real views

He did pretty well with O'riely..

__________________
"True Freedom is the Freedom to oppress others"

Ideology: Self Preservation.

Wow, where did you get that load of manure from, today's RNC talking points?

O'Reilly kicked his ass.

Funny. An Obamabot accusing me of bringing talking points to the forum. I don't visit any RNC websites to program myself with what I should think.

I thought O'Reilly did a fine and fair job which is wierd, and Obama handled himself quiet nicely. As I said in the McCain bashing threads, both these man are great choices. I wished for once that the situation wouldnt come down to mud slinging but here we are fellow Americans basically calling each other traitors,racists,lairs, cheaters, whores what have you. There are real debates to be had about the issues, about ideology, about our problems, but enough with this childish BS already.

__________________
"True Freedom is the Freedom to oppress others"

Ideology: Self Preservation.

The reason ideology threads do not get any attention is because most people already have agreed to disagree on many issues and it doesn't take much effort to figure out which candidate stands on which issues. There really is no need for debates on which candidate stands for what except among truely ignorant individuals. So that leaves us all talking about who we think would be a better leader or who would have the better character to represent the country or who is more reputable or who has a record to match their rhetoric, etc.

The only way you can come to this conclusion is to completely ignore his writings and works that occurred prior to this election cycle.

__________________
That information is classified and to be given only on a need-to-know basis...

And I do not need to know.