![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Sleepy wrote
Quote:
The rights to survivorship rights to pensions of gay partners will further drive up the costs of hiring workers. Military and veterans benefits will escalate if that event becomes legal. The impact to our society in economic terms is potentially frightening. You want see Social security collapse just legalize "Same sex marriage, ". Yes Sleepy has got this exactly right on target the cost of "Same sex marriage" may not be affordable but neither party has the "testicular fortitude" to talk about it. |
|
|||
|
As long as they don't consummate on my front lawn, why would I give a crap? Seriously, and the insurance companies will always find some way to make a buck. They probably had the possibility of such legislation calculated already into their actuarial analysis and therefore into your premiums...if they didn't then oooopsss one bad year, awwww....
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
_____________________ Marriage Penalty Myth |
|
||||
|
piniped wrote
Quote:
The harmful effects of HIV/AIDS/GAY MARRIAGE upon our health care system and and health care financing has/will exceed the effects of tort un-reform. The republicans are fixated on the lawsuits for this year as causing cost increases because of Edwards. As I said earlier nieghter the Reps nor the Dems have "intestinal fortitude" to admit that HIV/AIDS and domestic partners , and "gay marfriage " coverage has and will cause havoc to the health cost spiral and to pension and disability costs.. And like piniped I don't want anyone consummating their unions on my lawn; GAY, straight, bi-cross dressers, cross-eyed transvestites, whatever |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think you win the award for the most ridiculous argument against gay marriage. Congratulations!
__________________
"George W. Bush surrounds himself with smart people the way a hole surrounds itself with a donut." —Dennis Miller |
|
||||
|
I am not referring to legitimate gay marriages, I am talking about the potential for abuse by those who would abuse the system because they can.
What would stop a woman marrying another woman with seven kids to receive benefits until the right guy comes along? Stop and think of all the possible scenario? The programs meant to protect would become chaos. Employers could end up paying millions for those who would take advantage. Or do you believe that such situations are unthinkable? I guess its one way to solve the health care problem while breaking the bank. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|