Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2004, 12:55 AM
livefree livefree is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 921
livefree is on a distinguished road
Credits: 22,432
Default Do you think Bush might invade Iran to win our election?

As his election chances decline, there has been some speculation that Bush might try to pull some sort of "October Surprise", like perhaps "capturing" Bin Laden in the nick of time just before the election, in order to sway the voters his way. I came across this article which raises the even greater fear that the neo/cons might even try to actually start another war in order to manipulate the democratic process in America. If they did end up cynically spending the lives of our young soldiers for their own temporary personal political gain, they would indeed be guilty of high treason. I don't know for sure how accurate this reporter's information is, but what with the way the Bush Administration has been banging the war drums over Iran for some time now, I really wouldn't put something like this beyond the neo/cons, especially if they get desperate and feel that their power is at stake. I think this is worth keeping an eye on, especially for the next few weeks.
No More Bush Wars


A Bush pre-election strike on Iran 'imminent'
White House insider report "October Surprise" imminent
By Wayne Madsen

10/20/04 "Lebanon Wire" -- According to White House and Washington Beltway insiders, the Bush administration, worried that it could lose the presidential election to Senator John F. Kerry, has initiated plans to launch a military strike on Iran's top Islamic leadership, its nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, and key nuclear targets throughout the country, including the main underground research site at Natanz in central Iran and another in Isfahan. Targets of the planned U.S. attack reportedly include mosques in Tehran, Qom, and Isfahan known by the U.S. to headquarter Iran's top mullahs.

The Iran attack plan was reportedly drawn up after internal polling indicated that if the Bush administration launched a so-called anti-terrorist attack on Iran some two weeks before the election, Bush would be assured of a landslide win against Kerry. Reports of a pre-emptive strike on Iran come amid concerns by a number of political observers that the Bush administration would concoct an "October Surprise" to influence the outcome of the presidential election.

According to White House sources, the USS John F. Kennedy was deployed to the Arabian Sea to coordinate the attack on Iran. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld discussed the Kennedy's role in the planned attack on Iran when he visited the ship in the Arabian Sea on October 9. Rumsfeld and defense ministers of U.S. coalition partners, including those of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Iraq, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Mongolia, Poland, Qatar, Romania, and Ukraine briefly discussed a very "top level" view of potential dual-track military operations in Iran and Iraq in a special "war room" set up on board the aircraft carrier. America's primary ally in Iraq, the United Kingdom, did not attend the planning session because it reportedly disagrees with a military strike on Iran. London also suspects the U.S. wants to move British troops from Basra in southern Iraq to the Baghdad area to help put down an expected surge in Sh'ia violence in Sadr City and other Sh'ia areas in central Iraq when the U.S. attacks Iran as well as clear the way for a U.S. military strike across the Iraqi-Iranian border aimed at securing the huge Iranian oil installations in Abadan. U.S. allies South Korea, Australia, Kuwait, Jordan, Italy, Netherlands, and Japan were also left out of the USS John F. Kennedy planning discussions because of their reported opposition to any strike on Iran.

In addition, Israel has been supplied by the United States with 500 "bunker buster" bombs. According to White House sources, the Israeli Air Force will attack Iran's nuclear facility at Bushehr with the U.S. bunker busters.The joint U.S.-Israeli pre-emptive military move against Iran reportedly was crafted by the same neo-conservative grouping in the Pentagon and Vice President Dick Cheney's office that engineered the invasion of Iraq.

Morale aboard the USS John F. Kennedy is at an all-time low, something that must be attributable to the knowledge that the ship will be involved in an extension of U.S. military actions in the Persian Gulf region. The Commanding Officer of an F-14 Tomcat squadron was relieved of command for a reported shore leave "indiscretion" in Dubai and two months ago the Kennedy's commanding officer was relieved for cause.

The White House leak about the planned attack on Iran was hastened by concerns that Russian technicians present at Bushehr could be killed in an attack, thus resulting in a wider nuclear confrontation between Washington and Moscow. International Atomic Energy Agency representatives are also present at the Bushehr facility. In addition, an immediate Iranian Shahab ballistic missile attack against Israel would also further destabilize the Middle East. The White House leaks about the pre-emptive strike may have been prompted by warnings from the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency that an attack on Iran will escalate out of control. Intelligence circles report that both intelligence agencies are in open revolt against the Bush White House.

White House sources also claimed they are "terrified" that Bush wants to start a dangerous war with Iran prior to the election and fear that such a move will trigger dire consequences for the entire world.


Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and columnist. He served in the National Security Council (NSA) during the Reagan Administration and wrote the introduction to Forbidden Truth. He is the co-author, with john Stanton of "America's Nightmare: The Presidency of George Bush II." His forthcoming book is titled: "jaded Tasks: Big Oil, Black Ops, and Brass Plates." Madsen can be reached at Wmadsen777@aol.com

Copyright©1999-2004 Lebanonwire®.com http://www.lebanonwire.com/0410/04102002LW.asp

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)
__________________
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it. " --Noam Chomsky
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2004, 01:04 AM
LoSconosciuto's Avatar
LoSconosciuto LoSconosciuto is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,399
usa us virginia
LoSconosciuto is a glorious beacon of lightLoSconosciuto is a glorious beacon of lightLoSconosciuto is a glorious beacon of lightLoSconosciuto is a glorious beacon of lightLoSconosciuto is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 16,553
Default Maybe Bush mistook Ariel Sharon's voice

for that of God. He's hearing voices and getting orders from somewhere... we're just not sure from where.

There are reports that Israel is considering a strike against Iran's nukyuler facilities, but I doubt El Jorge would try it just now. Who would he send to invade? He's down to a couple of buses filled with Eagle Scouts now.

Besides, I doubt even a neo-con, who still has all of his wool, would be dopey enough to fall for that scheme.
__________________
"Tweeter was a Boyscout before she went to Vietnam and found out the hard way... nobody gives a d@mn."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2004, 12:35 PM
f100supersabr's Avatar
f100supersabr f100supersabr is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Konnektikutska Narodna Respublika
Posts: 9,441
usa us connecticut
f100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond reputef100supersabr has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 44,856
Default Do you think Bush might invade Iran to win our election?

Livefree if ever, it would be after the "lections".

and you know that may not be a bad idea. I would support that as mush as I oppose Iraq invasion to " spread democracy" all over the Middle East and to get rid of " bad men".

Iran has a greater potential to do evil as "evil doers" go.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden