Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Elections & Campaigns


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2004, 05:12 AM
maze51 maze51 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 419
maze51 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,983
Default Kerry's opaque voting record...

Why has flipflopping become the hallmark of John Kerry’s political career? It is not too hard to figure out. If you change your position at will, you never have to take a stand. It is called the path of least resistance, the coward’s survival strategy. How can we trust a candidate who will say anything to get elected?

Fact:

Kerry Voted For Authorization To Use Force In Iraq.
5/4/03

In First Dem Debate, Kerry Strongly Supported President’s Action In Iraq. KERRY: “George, I said at the time I would have preferred if we had given diplomacy a greater opportunity, but I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the President made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him.” (ABC News, Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Columbia, SC, 5/4/03)
9/2/03

Kerry Later Claimed He Voted “To Threaten” Use Of Force In Iraq. “I voted to threaten the use of force to make Saddam Hussein comply with the resolutions of the United Nations.” (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Announcement Of Presidential Candidacy, Mount Pleasant, SC, 9/2/03)


The Last We Heard...
Now, Kerry Says He Is Anti-War Candidate. CHRIS MATTHEWS: “Do you think you belong to that category of candidates who more or less are unhappy with this war, the way it’s been fought, along with General Clark, along with Howard Dean and not necessarily in companionship politically on the issue of the war with people like Lieberman, Edwards and Gephardt? Are you one of the anti-war candidates?” KERRY: “I am -- Yes, in the sense that I don’t believe the president took us to war as he should have, yes, absolutely.” (MSNBC’s “Hardball,” 1/6/04)

Fact:

Kerry Flip-Flopped On Eliminating Marriage Penalty For Middle Class
10/23/03

Kerry Said He Will Fight To Keep Tax Relief For Married Couples. “Howard Dean and Gephardt are going to put the marriage penalty back in place. So if you get married in America, we’re going to charge you more taxes. I do not want to do that.” (Fox News’ “Special Report,” 10/23/03)
7/31/03

Said Democrats Fought To End Marriage Penalty Tax. “We fought hard to get rid of the marriage penalty.” (MSNBC’s “News Live,” 7/31/03)


The Last We Heard...
But, In 1998, Kerry Voted Against Eliminating Marriage Penalty Relief For Married Taxpayers With Combined Incomes Less Than $50,000 Per Year, Saving Taxpayers $46 Billion Over 10 Years. (S. 1415, CQ Vote #154: Rejected 48-50: R 5-49; D 43-1, 6/10/98, Kerry Voted Yea)

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Patriot Act
10/25/01

Kerry Voted For Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was passed nearly unanimously by the Senate 98-1, and 357-66 in the House. (H.R. 3162, CQ Vote #313: Passed 98-1: R 49-0; D 48-1; I 1-0, 10/25/01, Kerry Voted Yea)
8/6/03

Kerry Used To Defend His Vote. “Most of [The Patriot Act] has to do with improving the transfer of information between CIA and FBI, and it has to do with things that really were quite necessary in the wake of what happened on September 11th.” (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Town Hall Meeting, Manchester, NH, 8/6/03)


The Last We Heard...
Now, Kerry Attacks Patriot Act. “We are a nation of laws and liberties, not of a knock in the night. So it is time to end the era of John Ashcroft. That starts with replacing the Patriot Act with a new law that protects our people and our liberties at the same time. I’ve been a District Attorney and I know that what law enforcement needs are real tools not restrictions on American’s basic rights.” (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Iowa State University, Iowa City, IA, 12/1/03)

Fact:

Kerry Took BOTH Sides In First Gulf War In Separate Letters To Same Constituent.
1/22/91

‘Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition ... to the early use of military force by the US against Iraq. I share your concerns. On January 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work and against a resolution giving the president the immediate authority to go to war.’ --letter from Senator John Kerry to Wallace Carter of Newton Centre, Massachusetts, dated January 22 [1991]
1/31/91

Thank you very much for contacting me to express your support for the actions of President Bush in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and unequivocally supported President Bush’s response to the crisis and the policy goals he has established with our military deployment in the Persian Gulf.’ --Senator Kerry to Wallace Carter, January 31 [1991]”


The Last We Heard...
He has not written to this constituent since 1991.

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Gay Marriage Amendment
7/12/02

In 2002, Kerry Signed Letter “Urging” MA Legislature To Reject Constitutional Amendment Banning Gay Marriage. “We rarely comment on issues that are wholly within the jurisdiction of the General Court, but there are occasions when matters pending before you are of such significance to all residents of the Commonwealth that we think it appropriate for us to express our opinion. One such matter is the proposed Constitutional amendment that would prohibit or seriously inhibit any legal recognition whatsoever of same-sex relationships. We believe it would be a grave error for Massachusetts to enshrine in our Constitution a provision which would have such a negative effect on so many of our fellow residents. … We are therefore united in urging you to reject this Constitutional amendment and avoid stigmatizing so many of our fellow citizens who do not deserve to be treated in such a manner.” (Sen. John Kerry, et al, Letter To Members Of The Massachusetts Legislature, 7/12/02)
2/6/04

Now, In 2004, Kerry Won’t Rule Out Supporting Similar Amendment. “Asked if he would support a state constitutional amendment barring gay and lesbian marriages, Kerry didn’t rule out the possibility. ‘I’ll have to see what language there is,’ he said.” (Susan Milligan, “Kerry Says GOP May Target Him On ‘Wedge Issue,’” The Boston Globe, 2/6/04)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry will not speak out on this subject in the presence of the media.

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Attacking President During Time Of War
3/11/03

In March 2003, Kerry Promised Not To Attack President When War Began. “Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts … said he will cease his complaints once the shooting starts. ‘It’s what you owe the troops,’ said a statement from Kerry, a Navy veteran of the Vietnam War. ‘I remember being one of those guys and reading news reports from home. If America is at war, I won’t speak a word without measuring how it’ll sound to the guys doing the fighting when they’re listening to their radios in the desert.’” (Glen Johnson, “Democrats On The Stump Plot Their War Rhetoric,” The Boston Globe, 3/11/03)
4/3/03

But Weeks Later, With Troops Just Miles From Baghdad, Kerry Broke His Pledge. “‘What we need now is not just a regime change in Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but we need a regime change in the United States,’ Kerry said in a speech at the Peterborough Town Library. Despite pledging two weeks ago to cool his criticism of the administration once war began, Kerry unleashed a barrage of criticism as US troops fought within 25 miles of Baghdad.” (Glen Johnson, “Kerry Says Us Needs Its Own ‘Regime Change,’” The Boston Globe, 4/3/03)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry called the president and his party the "the most crooked, you know, lying group I have ever seen".

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Death Penalty For Terrorists
9/16/96

In 1996, Kerry Attacked Governor Bill Weld For Supporting Death Penalty For Terrorists. KERRY: “Your policy would amount to a terrorist protection policy. Mine would put them in jail.” (1996 Massachusetts Senate Debate, 9/16/96)
7/3/96

In 1996, Kerry Said, “You Can Change Your Mind On Things, But Not On Life-And-Death Issues.” (Timothy J. Connolly, “The ‘Snoozer’ Had Some Life,” [Worcester, MA] Telegram & Gazette, 7/3/96)


The Last We Heard...
But, In 2002, Kerry Said He Supported Death Penalty For Terrorists. KERRY: “The law of the land is the law of the land, but I have also said that I am for the death penalty for terrorists because terrorists have declared war on your country.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 12/1/02)

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On No Child Left Behind
12/18/01

Kerry Voted For No Child Left Behind Act. (H.R. 1, CQ Vote #371: Adopted 87-10: R 44-3; D 43-6; I 0-1, 12/18/01, Kerry Voted Yea)
4/22/03

But Now Kerry Is Attacking No Child Left Behind As “Mockery.” “Between now and the time I’m sworn in January 2005, I’m going to use every day to make this president accountable for making a mockery of the words ‘No Child Left Behind.’” (Holly Ramer, “Kerry Wants To Make ‘Environmental Justice’ A Priority,” The Associated Press, 4/22/03)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry Trashed NCLB As ‘Unfunded Mandate’ With ‘Laudable’ Goals. “Kerry referred to [No Child Left Behind] as an ‘unfunded mandate’ with ‘laudable’ goals. ‘Without the resources, education reform is a sham,’ Kerry said. ‘I can’t wait to crisscross this country and hold this president accountable for making a mockery of the words “no child left behind.”‘” (Matt Leon, “Sen. Kerry In Tune With Educators,” The [Quincy, MA] Patriot Ledger, 7/11/03)

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Affirmative Action
4/8/92

In 1992, Kerry Called Affirmative Action “Inherently Limited And Divisive.” “[W]hile praising affirmative action as ‘one kind of progress’ that grew out of civil rights court battles, Kerry said the focus on a rights-based agenda has ‘inadvertently driven most of our focus in this country not to the issue of what is happening to the kids who do not get touched by affirmative action, but … toward an inherently limited and divisive program which is called affirmative action.’ That agenda is limited, he said, because it benefits segments of black and minority populations, but not all. And it is divisive because it creates a ‘perception and a reality of reverse discrimination that has actually engendered racism.’” (Lynne Duke, “Senators Seek Serious Dialogue On Race,” The Washington Post, 4/8/92)
1/30/04

In 2004, Kerry Denied Ever Having Called Affirmative Action “Divisive.” CNN’s KELLY WALLACE: “We caught up with the Senator, who said he never called affirmative action divisive, and accused Clark of playing politics.” SEN. KERRY: “That’s not what I said. I said there are people who believe that. And I said mend it, don’t end it. He’s trying to change what I said, but you can go read the quote. I said very clearly I have always voted for it. I’ve always supported it. I’ve never, ever condemned it. I did what Jim Clyburn did and what Bill Clinton did, which is mend it. And Jim Clyburn wouldn’t be supporting it if it were otherwise. So let’s not have any politics here. Let’s keep the truth.” (CNN’s “Inside Politics,” 1/30/04)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry Trashed NCLB As ‘Unfunded Mandate’ With ‘Laudable’ Goals. “Kerry referred to [No Child Left Behind] as an ‘unfunded mandate’ with ‘laudable’ goals. ‘Without the resources, education reform is a sham,’ Kerry said. ‘I can’t wait to crisscross this country and hold this president accountable for making a mockery of the words “no child left behind.”‘” (Matt Leon, “Sen. Kerry In Tune With Educators,” The [Quincy, MA] Patriot Ledger, 7/11/03)

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Ethanol
3/24/93

Kerry Twice Voted Against Tax Breaks For Ethanol. (S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #44: Rejected 48-52: R 11-32; D 37-20, 3/23/93, Kerry Voted Nay; S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #68: Motion Agreed To 55-43: R 2-40; D 53-3, 3/24/93, Kerry Voted Yea)
8/3/94

Kerry Voted Against Ethanol Mandates. (H.R. 4624, CQ Vote #255: Motion Agreed To 51-50: R 19-25; D 31-25, 8/3/94, Kerry Voted Nay) Kerry Voted Twice To Increase Liability On Ethanol, Making It Equal To Regular Gasoline. (S. 517, CQ Vote #87: Motion Agreed To 57-42: R 38-10; D 18-32; I 1-0, 4/25/02 Kerry Voted Nay; S. 14, CQ Vote #208: Rejected 38-57: R 9-40; D 28-17; I 1-0, 6/5/03, Kerry Voted Yea)


The Last We Heard...
On The Campaign Trail, Though, Kerry Is For Ethanol. KERRY: “I’m for ethanol, and I think it’s a very important partial ingredient of the overall mix of alternative and renewable fuels we ought to commit to.” (MSNBC/DNC, Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Des Moines, IA, 11/24/03)

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Cuba Sanctions
6/20/00

Senator Kerry Has Long Voted Against Stronger Cuba Sanctions. (H.R. 927, CQ Vote #489, Motion Rejected 59-36: R 50-2; D 9-34, 10/17/95, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 955, CQ Vote #183: Rejected 38-61: R 5-49; D 33-12, 7/17/97, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1234, CQ Vote #189, Motion Agreed To 55-43: R 43-10; D 12-33, 6/30/99, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 2549, CQ Vote #137: Motion Agreed To 59-41: R 52-3; D 7-38, 6/20/00, Kerry Voted Nay)
8/31/03

Now Kerry Panders To Cuban Vote, Saying He Would Not Lift Embargo Against Cuba. TIM RUSSERT: “Would you consider lifting sanctions, lifting the embargo against Cuba?” SEN. KERRY: “Not unilaterally, not now, no.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 8/31/03)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry Does Not Support “Opening Up The Embargo Wily Nilly.” “Kerry said he believes in ‘engagement’ with the communist island nation but that does not mean, ‘Open up the dialogue.’ He believes it ‘means travel and perhaps even remittances or cultural exchanges’ but he does not support ‘opening up the embargo wily nilly.’” (Daniel A. Ricker, “Kerry Says Bush Did Not Build A ‘Legitimate Coalition’ In Iraq,” The Miami Herald, 11/25/03)

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On NAFTA
11/20/93

Kerry Voted For NAFTA. (H.R. 3450, CQ Vote #395: Passed 61-38: R 34-10; D 27-28, 11/20/93, Kerry Voted Yea)
8/6/03

Now, Kerry Expresses Doubt About NAFTA. “Kerry, who voted for NAFTA in 1993, expressed some doubt about the strength of free-trade agreements. ‘If it were before me today, I would vote against it because it doesn’t have environmental or labor standards in it,’ he said.” (David Lightman, “Democrats Battle For Labor’s Backing,” Hartford Courant, 8/6/03)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry Does Not Support “Opening Up The Embargo Wily Nilly.” “Kerry said he believes in ‘engagement’ with the communist island nation but that does not mean, ‘Open up the dialogue.’ He believes it ‘means travel and perhaps even remittances or cultural exchanges’ but he does not support ‘opening up the embargo wily nilly.’” (Daniel A. Ricker, “Kerry Says Bush Did Not Build A ‘Legitimate Coalition’ In Iraq,” The Miami Herald, 11/25/03)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2004, 01:36 PM
ThereseM ThereseM is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,569
ThereseM is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,377
Default Maybe

Kerry running for election will save him from flip flopping until November since he hasn't done hardly any voting since he started his campaign. Which of course denies the wonderful citizens he represents a voice in the congress which by the way he is still being paid full salary for even though he's not doing his job! Which, with all his wife's millions, he should give up to help the less fortunate he says he is so worried about! What a joke he is!
__________________
Those who think they know everything, usually know the least.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2004, 06:24 PM
JustJoe JustJoe is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 320
JustJoe is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,957
Default So has Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by maze51";p=&quot View Post
Why has flipflopping become the hallmark of John Kerry’s political career? It is not too hard to figure out. If you change your position at will, you never have to take a stand. It is called the path of least resistance, the coward’s survival strategy. How can we trust a candidate who will say anything to get elected?
Given all Kerrys years in politics this isnt a large number, Bush has flip flopped on just as much including much more important issues in a much smaller amount of time. From saying during his canidacy about tough environmental solutions and doing the opposite, to the no child left behind issue and leaving 8 million behind, and the roadmap to a peace plan he went back on. Bush just gives the illusion that we know where he stands.

Fact:

Kerry Voted For Authorization To Use Force In Iraq.
5/4/03

In First Dem Debate, Kerry Strongly Supported President’s Action In Iraq. KERRY: “George, I said at the time I would have preferred if we had given diplomacy a greater opportunity, but I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the President made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him.” (ABC News, Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Columbia, SC, 5/4/03)
9/2/03

Kerry Later Claimed He Voted “To Threaten” Use Of Force In Iraq. “I voted to threaten the use of force to make Saddam Hussein comply with the resolutions of the United Nations.” (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Announcement Of Presidential Candidacy, Mount Pleasant, SC, 9/2/03)


The Last We Heard...
Now, Kerry Says He Is Anti-War Candidate. CHRIS MATTHEWS: “Do you think you belong to that category of candidates who more or less are unhappy with this war, the way it’s been fought, along with General Clark, along with Howard Dean and not necessarily in companionship politically on the issue of the war with people like Lieberman, Edwards and Gephardt? Are you one of the anti-war candidates?” KERRY: “I am -- Yes, in the sense that I don’t believe the president took us to war as he should have, yes, absolutely.” (MSNBC’s “Hardball,” 1/6/04)

Whats wrong with this statement? How is it a flipflop? Almost everyone was duped with the phoney initial bogus intelligence they forcefed us and after 9/11 we wanted to be better safe than sorry. But like Kerry said, yes its a good thing to get rid of Saddam but the way Bush did it, or allowed Rumsfield and Wolfowitz and other in the loop did it was down right stupid.

Fact:

Kerry Flip-Flopped On Eliminating Marriage Penalty For Middle Class
10/23/03

Kerry Said He Will Fight To Keep Tax Relief For Married Couples. “Howard Dean and Gephardt are going to put the marriage penalty back in place. So if you get married in America, we’re going to charge you more taxes. I do not want to do that.” (Fox News’ “Special Report,” 10/23/03)
7/31/03

Said Democrats Fought To End Marriage Penalty Tax. “We fought hard to get rid of the marriage penalty.” (MSNBC’s “News Live,” 7/31/03)


The Last We Heard...
But, In 1998, Kerry Voted Against Eliminating Marriage Penalty Relief For Married Taxpayers With Combined Incomes Less Than $50,000 Per Year, Saving Taxpayers $46 Billion Over 10 Years. (S. 1415, CQ Vote #154: Rejected 48-50: R 5-49; D 43-1, 6/10/98, Kerry Voted Yea)

Do we know the specifics on the bill here in question? Obviously all the other democrats seemed to have seen something wrong there to.

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Patriot Act
10/25/01

Kerry Voted For Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was passed nearly unanimously by the Senate 98-1, and 357-66 in the House. (H.R. 3162, CQ Vote #313: Passed 98-1: R 49-0; D 48-1; I 1-0, 10/25/01, Kerry Voted Yea)
8/6/03

Kerry Used To Defend His Vote. “Most of [The Patriot Act] has to do with improving the transfer of information between CIA and FBI, and it has to do with things that really were quite necessary in the wake of what happened on September 11th.” (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Town Hall Meeting, Manchester, NH, 8/6/03)


The Last We Heard...
Now, Kerry Attacks Patriot Act. “We are a nation of laws and liberties, not of a knock in the night. So it is time to end the era of John Ashcroft. That starts with replacing the Patriot Act with a new law that protects our people and our liberties at the same time. I’ve been a District Attorney and I know that what law enforcement needs are real tools not restrictions on American’s basic rights.” (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Iowa State University, Iowa City, IA, 12/1/03)

Just like the invasion of Iraq, maybe it seemed like a good idea at the time untill it got screwed up. When they abuse the Patriot Act to spy on democratic groups and they want to expand it further to take even more advantage of our freedoms. It was probably a good idea at the time in light of 9/11, but it needs to be replaced.


Fact:

Kerry Took BOTH Sides In First Gulf War In Separate Letters To Same Constituent.
1/22/91

‘Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition ... to the early use of military force by the US against Iraq. I share your concerns. On January 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work and against a resolution giving the president the immediate authority to go to war.’ --letter from Senator John Kerry to Wallace Carter of Newton Centre, Massachusetts, dated January 22 [1991]
1/31/91

Thank you very much for contacting me to express your support for the actions of President Bush in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and unequivocally supported President Bush’s response to the crisis and the policy goals he has established with our military deployment in the Persian Gulf.’ --Senator Kerry to Wallace Carter, January 31 [1991]”


The Last We Heard...
He has not written to this constituent since 1991.

Hmmmm, no big deal here, he wanted stronger sanctions but strongly agreed with how well Bush, or Schwarzkopf I should say, handled the deployment of the troops.
Fact:

Flip-Flopped On *beep* Marriage Amendment
7/12/02

In 2002, Kerry Signed Letter “Urging” MA Legislature To Reject Constitutional Amendment Banning *beep* Marriage. “We rarely comment on issues that are wholly within the jurisdiction of the General Court, but there are occasions when matters pending before you are of such significance to all residents of the Commonwealth that we think it appropriate for us to express our opinion. One such matter is the proposed Constitutional amendment that would prohibit or seriously inhibit any legal recognition whatsoever of same-sex relationships. We believe it would be a grave error for Massachusetts to enshrine in our Constitution a provision which would have such a negative effect on so many of our fellow residents. … We are therefore united in urging you to reject this Constitutional amendment and avoid stigmatizing so many of our fellow citizens who do not deserve to be treated in such a manner.” (Sen. John Kerry, et al, Letter To Members Of The Massachusetts Legislature, 7/12/02)
2/6/04

Now, In 2004, Kerry Won’t Rule Out Supporting Similar Amendment. “Asked if he would support a state constitutional amendment barring *beep* and *beep* marriages, Kerry didn’t rule out the possibility. ‘I’ll have to see what language there is,’ he said.” (Susan Milligan, “Kerry Says GOP May Target Him On ‘Wedge Issue,’” The Boston Globe, 2/6/04)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry will not speak out on this subject in the presence of the media.

Because the media favors Bush, he cant come out and say he may be a liberal because right wingers like Anne Coulter made it a dirty word that equals a traitor, and he cant talk abot "*beep*" marriage because he is in campaign mode and its too controversial of a subject. Youll note Bush too has backed off the subject as well once he found out there is a such thing as gay republicans.
Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Attacking President During Time Of War
3/11/03

In March 2003, Kerry Promised Not To Attack President When War Began. “Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts … said he will cease his complaints once the shooting starts. ‘It’s what you owe the troops,’ said a statement from Kerry, a Navy veteran of the Vietnam War. ‘I remember being one of those guys and reading news reports from home. If America is at war, I won’t speak a word without measuring how it’ll sound to the guys doing the fighting when they’re listening to their radios in the desert.’” (Glen Johnson, “Democrats On The Stump Plot Their War Rhetoric,” The Boston Globe, 3/11/03)
4/3/03

But Weeks Later, With Troops Just Miles From Baghdad, Kerry Broke His Pledge. “‘What we need now is not just a regime change in Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but we need a regime change in the United States,’ Kerry said in a speech at the Peterborough Town Library. Despite pledging two weeks ago to cool his criticism of the administration once war began, Kerry unleashed a barrage of criticism as US troops fought within 25 miles of Baghdad.” (Glen Johnson, “Kerry Says Us Needs Its Own ‘Regime Change,’” The Boston Globe, 4/3/03)

So he measured how it would sound to the guys doing the fighting when they’re listening to their radios in the desert, so whats the fuss?

The Last We Heard...
Kerry called the president and his party the "the most crooked, you know, lying group I have ever seen".
Fact

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Death Penalty For Terrorists
9/16/96

In 1996, Kerry Attacked Governor Bill Weld For Supporting Death Penalty For Terrorists. KERRY: “Your policy would amount to a terrorist protection policy. Mine would put them in jail.” (1996 Massachusetts Senate Debate, 9/16/96)
7/3/96

In 1996, Kerry Said, “You Can Change Your Mind On Things, But Not On Life-And-Death Issues.” (Timothy J. Connolly, “The ‘Snoozer’ Had Some Life,” [Worcester, MA] Telegram & Gazette, 7/3/96)


The Last We Heard...
But, In 2002, Kerry Said He Supported Death Penalty For Terrorists. KERRY: “The law of the land is the law of the land, but I have also said that I am for the death penalty for terrorists because terrorists have declared war on your country.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 12/1/02)

Im sure a lot of people probably may have changed their stance on the death penalty post 9/11. Not a biggie.
Fact:

Flip-Flopped On No Child Left Behind
12/18/01

Kerry Voted For No Child Left Behind Act. (H.R. 1, CQ Vote #371: Adopted 87-10: R 44-3; D 43-6; I 0-1, 12/18/01, Kerry Voted Yea)
4/22/03

But Now Kerry Is Attacking No Child Left Behind As “Mockery.” “Between now and the time I’m sworn in January 2005, I’m going to use every day to make this president accountable for making a mockery of the words ‘No Child Left Behind.’” (Holly Ramer, “Kerry Wants To Make ‘Environmental Justice’ A Priority,” The Associated Press, 4/22/03)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry Trashed NCLB As ‘Unfunded Mandate’ With ‘Laudable’ Goals. “Kerry referred to [No Child Left Behind] as an ‘unfunded mandate’ with ‘laudable’ goals. ‘Without the resources, education reform is a sham,’ Kerry said. ‘I can’t wait to crisscross this country and hold this president accountable for making a mockery of the words “no child left behind.”‘” (Matt Leon, “Sen. Kerry In Tune With Educators,” The [Quincy, MA] Patriot Ledger, 7/11/03)

How is this a flipflop? He agreed with the issue but Bush refused to properly fund it and it is now a sham. This is not a flipflop, if anything its a flipflop for Bush.

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Affirmative Action
4/8/92

In 1992, Kerry Called Affirmative Action “Inherently Limited And Divisive.” “[W]hile praising affirmative action as ‘one kind of progress’ that grew out of civil rights court battles, Kerry said the focus on a rights-based agenda has ‘inadvertently driven most of our focus in this country not to the issue of what is happening to the kids who do not get touched by affirmative action, but … toward an inherently limited and divisive program which is called affirmative action.’ That agenda is limited, he said, because it benefits segments of black and minority populations, but not all. And it is divisive because it creates a ‘perception and a reality of reverse discrimination that has actually engendered racism.’” (Lynne Duke, “Senators Seek Serious Dialogue On Race,” The Washington Post, 4/8/92)
1/30/04

In 2004, Kerry Denied Ever Having Called Affirmative Action “Divisive.” CNN’s KELLY WALLACE: “We caught up with the Senator, who said he never called affirmative action divisive, and accused Clark of playing politics.” SEN. KERRY: “That’s not what I said. I said there are people who believe that. And I said mend it, don’t end it. He’s trying to change what I said, but you can go read the quote. I said very clearly I have always voted for it. I’ve always supported it. I’ve never, ever condemned it. I did what Jim Clyburn did and what Bill Clinton did, which is mend it. And Jim Clyburn wouldn’t be supporting it if it were otherwise. So let’s not have any politics here. Let’s keep the truth.” (CNN’s “Inside Politics,” 1/30/04)

Dont say a reporter may have missuoted someone....gasp.

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Ethanol
3/24/93

Kerry Twice Voted Against Tax Breaks For Ethanol. (S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #44: Rejected 48-52: R 11-32; D 37-20, 3/23/93, Kerry Voted Nay; S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #68: Motion Agreed To 55-43: R 2-40; D 53-3, 3/24/93, Kerry Voted Yea)
8/3/94

Kerry Voted Against Ethanol Mandates. (H.R. 4624, CQ Vote #255: Motion Agreed To 51-50: R 19-25; D 31-25, 8/3/94, Kerry Voted Nay) Kerry Voted Twice To Increase Liability On Ethanol, Making It Equal To Regular Gasoline. (S. 517, CQ Vote #87: Motion Agreed To 57-42: R 38-10; D 18-32; I 1-0, 4/25/02 Kerry Voted Nay; S. 14, CQ Vote #208: Rejected 38-57: R 9-40; D 28-17; I 1-0, 6/5/03, Kerry Voted Yea)


The Last We Heard...
On The Campaign Trail, Though, Kerry Is For Ethanol. KERRY: “I’m for ethanol, and I think it’s a very important partial ingredient of the overall mix of alternative and renewable fuels we ought to commit to.” (MSNBC/DNC, Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Des Moines, IA, 11/24/03)

Its hard to say there is a flipflop on any issue when you just look at the surface. Sometimes there could be a bill you strongly agree with and have for years, but the republicans put it in front of democrats in a way or in such wording where they are forced to oppose it.

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On Cuba Sanctions
6/20/00

Senator Kerry Has Long Voted Against Stronger Cuba Sanctions. (H.R. 927, CQ Vote #489, Motion Rejected 59-36: R 50-2; D 9-34, 10/17/95, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 955, CQ Vote #183: Rejected 38-61: R 5-49; D 33-12, 7/17/97, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1234, CQ Vote #189, Motion Agreed To 55-43: R 43-10; D 12-33, 6/30/99, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 2549, CQ Vote #137: Motion Agreed To 59-41: R 52-3; D 7-38, 6/20/00, Kerry Voted Nay)
8/31/03

Now Kerry Panders To Cuban Vote, Saying He Would Not Lift Embargo Against Cuba. TIM RUSSERT: “Would you consider lifting sanctions, lifting the embargo against Cuba?” SEN. KERRY: “Not unilaterally, not now, no.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 8/31/03)


The Last We Heard...
Kerry Does Not Support “Opening Up The Embargo Wily Nilly.” “Kerry said he believes in ‘engagement’ with the communist island nation but that does not mean, ‘Open up the dialogue.’ He believes it ‘means travel and perhaps even remittances or cultural exchanges’ but he does not support ‘opening up the embargo wily nilly.’” (Daniel A. Ricker, “Kerry Says Bush Did Not Build A ‘Legitimate Coalition’ In Iraq,” The Miami Herald, 11/25/03)

Not a flipflop, he said he wouldnt lift the embargo unilaterally, opening dialogue is a far cry from a flipflop.

Fact:

Flip-Flopped On NAFTA
11/20/93

Kerry Voted For NAFTA. (H.R. 3450, CQ Vote #395: Passed 61-38: R 34-10; D 27-28, 11/20/93, Kerry Voted Yea)
8/6/03

Now, Kerry Expresses Doubt About NAFTA. “Kerry, who voted for NAFTA in 1993, expressed some doubt about the strength of free-trade agreements. ‘If it were before me today, I would vote against it because it doesn’t have environmental or labor standards in it,’ he said.” (David Lightman, “Democrats Battle For Labor’s Backing,” Hartford Courant, 8/6/03)

10 years later he realized NAFTA may have been a bad idea, so?
__________________
JJ
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2004, 06:31 PM
JustJoe JustJoe is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 320
JustJoe is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,957
Default Another

Another flipflop of Bush....

During his run to be president he made the claim that the plotters and attackers of the USS Cole should be sought and taken out, yet when he got to office and it became clear who it was, he did nothing, nada, zip, zilch, zero, except think of ways to invade Iraq and push his tax breaks for the rich.
__________________
JJ
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2004, 06:47 PM
maze51 maze51 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 419
maze51 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,983
Default Hey Joe, what ya do'n with that gun in yo hand?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJoe";p=&quot View Post
Another flipflop of Bush....

During his run to be president he made the claim that the plotters and attackers of the USS Cole should be sought and taken out, yet when he got to office and it became clear who it was, he did nothing, nada, zip, zilch, zero, except think of ways to invade Iraq and push his tax breaks for the rich.
Hello? Hello? Hello? Joe welcome to earth. I think the answer you seek oh wise one is al Qaeda, we're there, we liberated, soldiers still searching. I will soon be starting a remedial forum in case you are interested.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2004, 07:01 PM
oddlycalm oddlycalm is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mildew Manor
Posts: 484
oddlycalm is on a distinguished road
Credits: 4,485
Default Either you don't understand the legislative process, or you

...assume that others don't.

Anyone that has even a cursory understanding of our legislature grasps that votes are rarely simple as yea or nea on a simple question. Most bills are huge conglomerations of dozens of major and minor provisions, with all manner of unrelated provisions tacked on in back room deals simply to get the bill reported out of committee and to the floor. Then, more items are tacked on or deleted to reconcile the House an Senate versions before the legislation goes to the Whitehouse to be signed. Senators and congressmen vote for and against bills for reasons that are not evident unless the entirety of the bill is examined and understood.

This is why legislators are rarely elected to the presidency. It's easy for the opposition to sit back and real off all manner of information on their voting record month after month. You know, like you did on this thread. Doesn't mean anything, but a few stupid peckerheads might get fooled.

It's also why the fight to get the line item veto has been a long one. Legislators don't want the president to be able to cut out their little tag along pork barrel provisions, and presidents hate signing legislation they want when it comes with a hundred items they don't want attached.

This is also why presidents sometimes veto bills that were part of their own legislative agenda. If Bush gets his defense bill passed, but it has a provision that mandates free late term abortions on all military bases without spousal consultation, then he would veto the bill. Next thing you know, somebody like maze51 comes along and says he's weak on defense, and an Al Qaeda sympathizer to boot...

oc
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2004, 07:26 PM
maze51 maze51 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 419
maze51 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,983
Default Yes I do get it, but it is still the vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by oddlycalm";p=&quot View Post
...assume that others don't.

Anyone that has even a cursory understanding of our legislature grasps that votes are rarely simple as yea or nea on a simple question. Most bills are huge conglomerations of dozens of major and minor provisions, with all manner of unrelated provisions tacked on in back room deals simply to get the bill reported out of committee and to the floor. Then, more items are tacked on or deleted to reconcile the House an Senate versions before the legislation goes to the Whitehouse to be signed. Senators and congressmen vote for and against bills for reasons that are not evident unless the entirety of the bill is examined and understood.

This is why legislators are rarely elected to the presidency. It's easy for the opposition to sit back and real off all manner of information on their voting record month after month. You know, like you did on this thread. Doesn't mean anything, but a few stupid peckerheads might get fooled.

It's also why the fight to get the line item veto has been a long one. Legislators don't want the president to be able to cut out their little tag along pork barrel provisions, and presidents hate signing legislation they want when it comes with a hundred items they don't want attached.

This is also why presidents sometimes veto bills that were part of their own legislative agenda. If Bush gets his defense bill passed, but it has a provision that mandates free late term abortions on all military bases without spousal consultation, then he would veto the bill. Next thing you know, somebody like maze51 comes along and says he's weak on defense, and an Al Qaeda sympathizer to boot...

oc
I understand completely, his record is still open to scrutiny
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2004, 12:35 AM
Tedminator's Avatar
Tedminator Tedminator is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 8,706
usa us florida
Tedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond reputeTedminator has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 37,952
Default The way to make W look good is by tearing everyone else down

Quote:
You hate him, but at least you know where 'W'stands
Yes, we all know where dubya stands on nation building. I especially like that conservative stance on keeping the federal govt small while keeping spending down, and lets not forget the brilliant way he brought people together. He is a true conservative.
__________________
.




"When I'm in command, every mission is a suicide mission!" -Capt. Zapp Branigan
The United Church of the Latter Day Tangential Tarts
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2004, 09:58 AM
Nathan Nathan is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,043
Nathan is on a distinguished road
Credits: 7,349
Default re:

I remember back in 2000 i didn't really like gore, but today i like him a lot better. That shows what all that negative campaigning will do to the public and media's impression of a person.

and honestly, if i had someone recording everything i said and wrote for my whole career, i'm sure they could make me, or anyone, look like an idiot.

Another thing, bills in congress are a bundle of comprimises. Just because you voted against something + 10 other things doesn't mean you oppose that something.

Kerry's flip-flop on the war in iraq probably has something to do with the fact that bush was WRONG about iraqi WMDs. He said he voted to disarm iraq, but there was nothing to disarm.

And yes, Kerry isn't perfect. I supported clark in the primary.

But compare him to bush for a minute.


Bush, the man who preaches fiscal conservatism, while raising the national debt to record level.

Bush, who preaches education, while forcing the states to cut funding for it.

Bush, who preaches homeland security, while forcing the states to cut funding for firefighers and police officers.

Bush, who preaches fiscal conservatism, and while in the heap of a deficit, launches a new policy of welfare for the rich, and a medicare bill that even the democrats don't support.

Yes, kerry isn't perfect, he's a polititian for god sakes, but at least he's not a sell out like bush.
__________________
"The belief that nothing exists outside your own mind--surely there must be some way of demonstrating that it was false" - 1984
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2004, 01:30 PM
oddlycalm oddlycalm is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mildew Manor
Posts: 484
oddlycalm is on a distinguished road
Credits: 4,485
Default It's a simply choice really

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan";p=&quot View Post
Yes, kerry isn't perfect, he's a polititian for god sakes, but at least he's not a sell out like bush.
In the end it's all about the man, not a tally on a piece of paper. Kerry has years of foreign policy experience and also has more than two functioning neurons, both in stark contrast to George Bush. He also had the guts to speak out about a war that was wrong when there was nothing in it for him.

After the 2000 election everybody with any common sense crossed their fingers and hoped that Bush would not be tested by difficult international challenges, because it was widely reckognized that he would be out of his depth. Well he was, and he has made a dismal showing. Kerry would not have been my first pick, but McCain is not on the ballot.

oc
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden