I see that you are still unable to have an adult conversation. Good to go.

But just one thing. If the model was wrong for the US, and 1998 was not the hottest year. Does that not make you doubt the other data from around the world? Especially seeing as the U.S. is credited for having the most accurate measurements.

If you can not respond as an adult then please do not respond.

__________________
ACHIEVEMENT
“Doing a good job in this place is kind of like peeing your pants while wearing a dark suit. You get a warm feeling, but no one notices..”


Http://www.nationalgunforum.com

What "model" was wrong. What are you talking about?
Where is "the U.S. is credited for having the most accurate measurements"
As usual - you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Just like when you said there were "thousands" of scientific papers from peer-reviewed journals yet that debunk global warming theory?

Just like when you said that the word "Islamofascist" was coined in the 1930's

Your post is just another string of misinterpreted facts and made-up jibberish. Hope that is "adult" enough for you. At least I am "adult" enough not to make things up and tell lies, as I have caught you doing so frequently.

__________________
Have you ever stood toe to toe with someone that was intent on kicking your arse? C-D-P

What was the temperature difference between 1938 and 1998?

__________________
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?

Hold on, let me get it. I just want you to know I haven't abandoned this thread.

__________________
I think America is finally ready for another president with polio.

The differences were very minor. And thank you for asking me that question. You know why I thank you? Because it shows that the highest temps were not that different even though global warming is supposed to have played a major factor over the years. If that were the case then you would think that the differences would be great.

Tut, I have not forgotten about you. I will be back later.

__________________
ACHIEVEMENT
“Doing a good job in this place is kind of like peeing your pants while wearing a dark suit. You get a warm feeling, but no one notices..”


Http://www.nationalgunforum.com

Question for C-D-P, SpankyTheWhale, Professor Peabody, PatriotNews and anyone else: Do you accept that the global temperature is increasing but deny humans are responsible or do you not even deny that the global temperature is increasing?

__________________
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?

The truth shall set you free
http://www.liberallyconservative.com/?cat=25
Although the site is bias the articule about globalwarming is not.
As for the whole idea of global warming you must first consider what does someone gain by convincing million of people that the world is shifting and it may harm them. They gain money by presenting a problem and offering to solve but of course they need money to do it and they cant find the money themselves they need yours.

I, speaking only for myself, even though I suspect that the others would largely agree with me, deny that it matters negatively even if it did exist in the full form that Al Gore wants it to be portrayed as. I literally don't care. I'm not even against it in the rebellious "I'm going to throw even MORE trash on the ground" kind of way. I just don't care one way or the other. Sometimes picking up trash makes me feel good, so I do it, but sometimes I decide that in the grand scheme of things I picked up that piece of trash just because Captain Planet told me to back when I was in second grade. I also think that a lot of things that global warming nuts tell me to do are just basic common sense that I would probably agree with doing even if I was assured that the world will continue in perfect perpetuity for one million billion years. However, I also think that a lot of things that global warming nuts do, say, want me to do, and want me to say are ridiculous and I would be better served trying to play the stock market buying on margin instead of worrying about a carbon footprint that is based on sci-fi gypsy fortune teller crap. The global temperature might even be increasing, but I don't think that you can convince me that there is anything wrong with this unless you concoct some sort of climatological "normal temperature." I probably wouldn't even fully accept that scenario because there is no way that you can account for literally a planet+atmosphere's-worth of variables in a way that could reflect an objectively (or even a subjectively) bad direction of climate.

__________________
I think America is finally ready for another president with polio.

Bug.

http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/A...gger_from_data

I will not engage you further until you can have an adult conversation.

Mannie.

It is not that the temp is or is not rising. It is how the whole thing is done.

We have not been studying the global climate long enough to say anything.

The models and data are fouled, the percentages of what we actually produce do not meet with the claims. The GW guys do not seem to be looking at alternative causes. There is just too much junk science.

Could GW be happening? Maybe. Could we be the cause? Maybe. But why spend so much money finding out if we are the cause? We all know that pollution is bad (maybe not for the environment, maybe it is. But it is bad for us). Why not divert all this wasted money elsewhere? Hell we may never know what or who is really to blame.

I tried bringing this up earlier in the thread, but was attacked. Can anyone give me an answer in an adult manner? If not then please do us all a favor and hit the back button.

I am tired of talking about who is wrong, and who is right. That is all this forum is. Why not talk about solutions and how to deal with stuff?

This is fricking idiotic.

__________________
ACHIEVEMENT
“Doing a good job in this place is kind of like peeing your pants while wearing a dark suit. You get a warm feeling, but no one notices..”


Http://www.nationalgunforum.com

It's hard to tell since 9500 temperature monitoring stations were shut down, many of them in the cold climate Soviet Union. Monitoring the earth's temperature with one third of the monitoring stations is bound to give flawed results.