From your list that haven't signed:
David H. Douglass
Benjamin D. Pearson
L. F. Khilyuk
John R. Christy
Kirill Ya. Kondratyev,
Eric S. Posmentier .
What they don't keep in contact with their professional associates?
IPCC contributors that haven't signed:

Andrew Staniforth
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction
and Research, Met Offi ce
UK

Ronald J. Stouffer
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Geophysical
Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
USA

Mark Tadross
Climate Systems Analysis Group,
University of Cape Town
South Africa

Chris Thorncroft
Department of Earth and Atmospheric
Science, University at Albany, SUNY
USA, UK
Surely if there are so many IPCC contributors that disagree with their conclusions, some would have taken the time to sign the petition. Even Landsea and Pielke have not signed it. Nor have McKitrick and McIntyre.

And FYI, Lindzen has never criticized the science in IPCC's Working Group I: The Science of Climate Change. What he is critical of is the "Summary for Policy Makers."

__________________
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?

On my previous postings I already gave you a list of only a portion of signers of the petition that had peer review publications, I am sorry you can't accept that, but you may feel free to go through all 19,000 if you like.

Below are the references used to make the statement that you claim is incorrect, which one or ones are you claiming are incorrect and please show the basis for your claim?


4) References to 95% contribution of water vapor:

a. S.M. Freidenreich and V. Ramaswamy, “Solar Radiation Absorption by Carbon Dioxide, Overlap with Water, and a Parameterization for General Circulation Models,” Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (1993):7255-7264

b. Global Deception: The Exaggeration of the Global Warming Threat
by Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, June 1998
Virginia State Climatologist and Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia

c. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Appendix D, Greenhouse Gas Spectral Overlaps and Their Significance
Energy Information Administration; Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government

d. Personal Communication-- Dr. Richard S. Lindzen
Alfred P. Slone Professor of Meteorology, MIT

e. The Geologic Record and Climate Change
by Dr. Tim Patterson, January 2005
Professor of Geology-- Carleton University
Ottawa, Canada
Listed as Peer Reviewed @ http://petesplace-peter.blogspot.com...te-change.html

f. EPA Seeks To Have Water Vapor Classified As A Pollutant
by the ecoEnquirer, 2006

g. Air and Water Issues
by Freedom 21.org, 2005
Citation: Bjorn Lomborg, p. 259. Also: Patrick Michaels and Robert Balling, Jr. The Satanic Gases, Clearing the Air About Global Warming (Washington, DC: CATO Institute, 2000), p. 25.

h. Does CO2 Really Drive Global Warming?
by Dr. Robert Essenhigh, May 2001

i. Solar Cycles, Not CO2, Determine Climate
by Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., 21st Century Science and Technology, Winter 2003-2004, pp. 52-65

Here is what a peer reviewer has to say about the process:

__________________
China uses more coal than the United States, the European Union and Japan combined.

This is very true, if you see most of the charts on Greenhouse Gases, you will notice in very small print at the bottom, "Excluding Water Vapor"

Here's another one...

And another...

And another...

And another problem is that EVERY ONE of the charts that show CO2 on the rise, relies on Mauna Loa Hawaii. Here's the thing, there's something over there called a VOLCANO. You know, those things that spew ash, molten lava and tons and tons of CO2! Now if you take a look at the chart, you'll notice that in 1998, we had the greatest growth in concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, ever. The following year, we had the lowest growth on record since 1992. In 2007, it was back down to supposedly growing at 2.14%. This doesn't fit with the fact that CO2 output has been going up exponentially EVERY year since 1998, due to the tremendous surge in output by the Chinese and Indians. Since that time, the U.S. hasn't reduced our Carbon Output AT ALL, instead we've increased our Carbon Output, AND the Chinese have actually overtaken us in Carbon Output by a fairly wide margin.
How is it possible, that the chart shows reducing growth in CO2 output since 1998, when the world has SO DRAMATICALLY increased it's total CO2 output? The reason is simple, Man made CO2 emissions only amount to 3.207% of all CO2! Just as the Ice Cores have shown us for the past Million years, when Temperatures rise, you have a rise in Carbon Output. Period. Nothing we do can change or affect that, we have too small of an impact on the planet to make much of a difference. This is why we don't see a massive spike in CO2 output on the data, because the only thing that is measuring is the fluctuations in the CO2 output of that very active volcano over there.

__________________
http://www.nosocialism.com
-----------------------------------------------
America is not a Socialist country, this is why the only democrats who ever win, are democrats who SOUND like Republicans (Hello Bill Clinton - Low taxes, Free Trade, Welfare Reform, Era of Big Government Over - Sounds Republican).

No, what's retarded is that anyone can expect to draw any conclusions from a petition that's confusing. What's retarded is that anyone can draw a conclusion without knowing the total numbers of petitions sent out. What's retarded is that you complain about the lack of qualifications on the IPCC contributions list but don't question the names on a list that you agree with. I could go on but the bottom line is that petition is pure propaganda.

__________________
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?

Again, here's a video with the LEAD AUTHOR of the IPCC report, basically refuting Anthropogenic Global Warming.

__________________
http://www.nosocialism.com
-----------------------------------------------
America is not a Socialist country, this is why the only democrats who ever win, are democrats who SOUND like Republicans (Hello Bill Clinton - Low taxes, Free Trade, Welfare Reform, Era of Big Government Over - Sounds Republican).

You do realize how Schwartz came to those conclusions. right. Let me give you a hint: It's a method you've been ranting about its inaccuracies.
Priceless
And there's already a rebuttal with 4 authors:We'll see how you're linked study holds up to further invesigation.

__________________
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?

Whats confusing about it? 19,000 scientists say don't sign the kyoto accord your making a mistake.

This petition was online in the age of information we live in ANYONE with a computer could have accessed it you can't draw conclusions of people who don't say anything there could be hundreds of reasons they don't besides that they don't agree with it.

Whats to question? The Oregon petition is AGAINST the idea of AGW and theres 19,000 of them it's the largest of it's kind and i'm not going to ignore it. I will laugh at the 2,100 that every global warming enthusiast loves to bring up so frequently! Since its not even a number agreeing with it its just a list of 'any experts in relevant fields' alot of which disagree but were ignored.

Oww the oregon petition is propaganda!?! typical!!

Thank you for proving my point about the inconclusiveness of the so called evidence.

Who are they and where can I find their peer reviewed publications?

__________________
China uses more coal than the United States, the European Union and Japan combined.

Even if it wasn't, I wouldn't try to fight it. I like hot.

__________________
I think America is finally ready for another president with polio.

Thanks for the video link, I watched the whole thing. Notice how many IPCC scientists tell it like it is!

__________________
China uses more coal than the United States, the European Union and Japan combined.