|
|
05-13-2008, 02:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
We can't accurately predict whether it's going to rain or not a week from now. We can't accurately predict what the weather will look like next year (Remember that in 2005, they were predicting we'd be hammered with non-stop hurricanes in 2006 because of global warming. It didn't happen). Since that's the case, how can we possibly have any confidence in predictions of what the weather will be like in 50-100 years? If there is no confidence in the predictions can we justify spending billions on them?
__________________
Barack Obama's Executive Flop If Obama couldn't lead such a small organization as the Chicago Annenberg Challenge to success, how can any one bellieve he can lead this country to it? 
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
05-13-2008, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environ...le-440116.html Yes I see your logic, you filter out anything you don't want to hear. ... What was that, "lalalalalalalalalala" Yeah right, take your hands off your ears, and listen.
__________________
Have you ever stood toe to toe with someone that was intent on kicking your arse? C-D-P Last edited by bugalugs; 05-13-2008 at 05:19 PM.
|
|
05-13-2008, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Who is predicting what the weather will be like in 50-100 years? Do you know the difference between "climate" and "weather"?
__________________
Have you ever stood toe to toe with someone that was intent on kicking your arse? C-D-P
|
|
05-13-2008, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
First - Mt. Pinatubo did not spew billions on tons of CFC's into the atmosphere. CFCs are man-made. Mt Pinatubo spewed billions of tonnes of sulfate aerosols, which reacted with CFCs in the ozone layer to casue ozone depletion Second - Yes, of course solar radiation creates ozone. CFCs and other chemicals break it down. Since the Montreal Protocol and subsequent ban on production of CFCs - the ozone hole has been slowly repairing. The point of mentioning CFCs was to highlight the silliness of Prof Peabody's ideas that CO2 is harmeless because it is in small concentrations. CFCs occur in extremely small concentrations in the atmostphere - yet the damage that have caused (and still continue to cause) has been clearly demonstrated.
__________________
Have you ever stood toe to toe with someone that was intent on kicking your arse? C-D-P
|
|
05-13-2008, 09:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
All CFCs are Haloalkanes, but not all Haloalkanes are CFCs. Mt. Pinatubo (or any other volcano) did not spew billions on tons of CFC's into the atmosphere. The atmospheric CFCs responsible for th ebreakdown of the ozone layer are man made.
__________________
Have you ever stood toe to toe with someone that was intent on kicking your arse? C-D-P
|
|
05-13-2008, 09:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. -- Ann Coulter
|
|
05-13-2008, 10:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Barack Obama's Executive Flop If Obama couldn't lead such a small organization as the Chicago Annenberg Challenge to success, how can any one bellieve he can lead this country to it?
|
|
05-13-2008, 10:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If greenhouse gases produced by mankind are behind the roughly one degree increase in temperature over the last century, then why did the global temperature go down from roughly 1940 to 1975 even though mankind's production of greenhouse gases was skyrocketing during that same time period?
__________________
Barack Obama's Executive Flop If Obama couldn't lead such a small organization as the Chicago Annenberg Challenge to success, how can any one bellieve he can lead this country to it?
|
|
05-14-2008, 03:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Someone hijacked my sig again.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
Linear Mode
