Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Environment & Conservation


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 06:32 PM
bugalugs bugalugs is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 808
australia au queensland
bugalugs is a jewel in the roughbugalugs is a jewel in the roughbugalugs is a jewel in the roughbugalugs is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 5,659
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5 View Post
Then there is this noted scientist and expert on weather and climate:

"I am of the opinion that this is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people, " says Bill Gray.

"BILL GRAY, professor emeritus. He is often called the World's Most Famous Hurricane Expert. He's the guy who, every year, predicts the number of hurricanes that will form during the coming tropical storm season. He works on a country road leading into the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains, in the atmospheric science department of Colorado State University. He's mentored dozens of scientists"

"Gray believes in the obs. The observations. Direct measurements. Numerical models can't be trusted. Equation pushers with fancy computers aren't the equals of scientists who fly into hurricanes.

"Few people know what I know. I've been in the tropics, I've flown in airplanes into storms. I've done studies of convection, cloud clusters and how the moist process works. I don't think anybody in the world understands how the atmosphere functions better than me."

In just three, five, maybe eight years, he says, the world will begin to cool again."


"Bill Gray has a favorite diagram, taken from a 1985 climate model, showing little nodules in the center with such labels as "thermal inertia" and "net energy balance" and "latent heat flux" and "subsurface heat storage" and "absorbed heat radiation" and so on, and they are emitting arrows that curve and loop in all directions, bumping into yet more jargon, like "soil moisture" and "surface roughness" and "vertical wind" and "mel(*)(*)(*)(*)er" and "volcanoes."

"It's a big can of worms!" Gray says. It's his favorite line.

The models can't even predict the weather in two weeks, much less 100 years, he says.

"They sit in this ivory tower, playing around, and they don't tell us if this is going to be a hot summer coming up. Why not? Because the models are no (*)(*)(*)(*) good!"

Gray says the recent rash of strong hurricanes is just part of a cycle. This is part of the broader skeptical message: Climate change is normal and natural. There was a Medieval Warm Period, for example, long before Exxon Mobil existed."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...301305_pf.html

Still lots of controvery and conflict among scientists. So, yes Raytri. I read all the pros and cons opinions on global warming. I've yet to see any hard and fast proven conclusions that what we're seeing now is NOT more a part of the natural phenomonon of climate.

And as far as consensus of scientists....look at where the funding is going for your answer. The funding is going to those who are trying hard to prove that global warming IS caused by man.
Where is Mr Grey's published research supporting his views? Or do you just get your science from media bites?

No - there is not "Still lots of controvery and conflict among scientists" as to whether globa warming is being caused by human activity.

If there is - show me the published dissenting papers
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 03:06 AM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBob View Post
This thread is not categorized properly. The Global Warming Myth is not an environmental issue, it is a political issue.
Actually, it is becoming a religious issue.......
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 04:13 AM
bugalugs bugalugs is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 808
australia au queensland
bugalugs is a jewel in the roughbugalugs is a jewel in the roughbugalugs is a jewel in the roughbugalugs is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 5,659
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5 View Post
Yeah....Chicken Little is hard at work.

There's NO PROOF that man is doing it.....or much of it anyway. So, EVEN IF it's happening, it's rather egotistical of humans to think they can do much...IF ANYTHING....about it.

And if we are really SCARED and SERIOUS here's the answer for now: NUCLEAR ENERGY. It's what they've got in countries like France. And it's clean and affordable.

So....question for the libs on here: WHY AREN'T WE DOING NUCLEAR ENERGY?? Why isn't Gore---the know-it-all ---pushing this option?
Nuclear energy isn't particularly clean or affordable. The nuclear fission process can be clean with proper management, certainly - but there is still an enormous amount of energy that must be expended to mine uranium ore and process this into a usable fuel. Not to mention just the standard environmental risks that are involved in any major heavy metal mining operation. And the major cost that is never accounted for when people try to find the real cost of nuclear energy is the rehabilitation costs of mined land and the decommissioning costs of obsolete reactors.

Thene there is the nuclear waste issue, the nuclear weapon issue, blah, blah blah.

I have nothing against nuclear energy as such - but it simply is not a solution to our future energy problems. It simply makes no sense to replace one finite, polluting energy source with another finite, polluting energy source. And uranium resources are very finite. There really is very little fuel grade uranium available.

Thorium reactors - now that may be the thing of the future. I don't know a lot about it, but what I have read sounds promising.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2008, 05:45 AM
Professor Peabody's Avatar
Professor Peabody Professor Peabody is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Age: 49
Posts: 928
usa us california
Professor Peabody has disabled reputation
Credits: 5,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5 View Post
Here's my best prediction of things to come: IF the Dems are lucky enough to get the presidency next time---(and they'll need to be very lucky)....I predict during his or her term as president we will hear NO MORE from the global warming alarmists about global warming. Just as the "homeless" suddenly disappear during a Democrat's presidency, so will the dire warnings of global warming.
History proves you right JP! Check out the spending on alternate energy during the Clinton's first stay in the White House.

According to a GAO report alternate energy research and development hit an all time low between 1993 and 2000, Bill Clinton's administration. The GAO's study ran from 1978 to 2008. How can we believe Hillary is serious about alternate energy sources with her track record in the 1990's when she was co-president?

http://www.gao.gov/highlights/d08556thigh.pdf
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden