LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksHe is full of deception. Look at his videos. He is a GW propagandist. He gave no specifics as to how the daily mail was wrong just general denial and saying it would be addressed later.Originally Posted by Poor Debater
Guru
He is full of deception. Look at his videos. He is a GW propagandist. He gave no specifics as to how the daily mail was wrong just general denial and saying it would be addressed later.
Commentator
You're wrong: clearly you didn't read his latest, which I have already linked to. He gave a full quote from Dr. Lu:
What about that isn't specific enough for you?It is unfortunate that my research, “An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula,” recently published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, has been misrepresented by a number of media outlets.
Several of these media articles assert that our study claims the entire Earth heated up during medieval times without human CO2 emissions. We clearly state in our paper that we studied one site at the Antarctic Peninsula. The results should not be extrapolated to make assumptions about climate conditions across the entire globe. Other statements, such as the study “throws doubt on orthodoxies around global warming,” completely misrepresent our conclusions. Our study does not question the well-established anthropogenic warming trend.
Last edited by Poor Debater; Mar 30 2012 at 09:52 PM.
The Top 5 Tactics of climate denial:
1. Cherry Picking 2. Fake Experts 3. Impossible Expectations 4. Misrepresenting the Science & Logical Fallacies 5. Conspiracy Theories
Diethelm & Mckee 2009
Honesty is not on the list.
Guru
What is misrepresented? This is more generalization to avoid admitting the reporters are right
So you show more propaganda from Sinclair who is not credible.
Last edited by ptif219; Mar 30 2012 at 10:31 PM.
Banned
Guru
Are you taking the (*)(*)(*)(*)?
How many times have to been shown the scientists exact words?
His report was misrepresented.
His report showed warming at one site on the Antarctic Peninsula
We clearly state in our paper that we studied one site at the Antarctic Peninsula.
The Daily Mail claimed this applied to the whole planet:
The results should not be extrapolated to make assumptions about climate conditions across the entire globe
the Daily Mail said his conclusions "throw doubt on orthodoxies around global warming"
Other statements, such as the study “throws doubt on orthodoxies around global warming,” completely misrepresent our conclusions. Our study does not question the well-established anthropogenic warming trend.
How long do you intend to keep this nonsense up?
Guru
His report shows AGW has been wrong and now the GW community want to spin it to say it should be not seen for what it is.
Truth is warming occurred then as it is now. warming is natural.
GW propagandists are being seen for the eliteists arrogant hacks they are.
now anyone that denies AGW is a mental case. More proof GW is a scam
http://www.infowars.com/climate-chan...ays-professor/
Commentator
Since you apparently can't read, I'll spell it out for you. Sound out the letters one at a time:
1. The Daily Mail said, "The whole of the Earth heated up in medieval times". Dr. Lu's paper only looked at a single site in Antarctica, not the whole Earth. MISREPRESENTATION!
2. The Daily Mail said, "Current theories of the causes and impact of global warming have been thrown into question" by Lu's research. Dr. Lu says such statements "completely misrepresent our conclusions". GROSS MISREPRESENTATION!
3. The Daily Mail said, "At present the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) argues that the Medieval Warm Period was confined to Europe." The IPCC says nothing of the sort. In fact, IPCC AR4 says the MWP covers at least the entire northern hemisphere: "The evidence currently available indicates that NH mean temperatures during medieval times (950–1100) were indeed warm in a 2-kyr context". GROSS MISREPRESENTATION!
And you still have not shown a single instance of Sinclair misrepresenting anything.
As usual, deniers have ZERO evidence for ANYTHING they say. No wonder nobody believes you.
The Top 5 Tactics of climate denial:
1. Cherry Picking 2. Fake Experts 3. Impossible Expectations 4. Misrepresenting the Science & Logical Fallacies 5. Conspiracy Theories
Diethelm & Mckee 2009
Honesty is not on the list.
Guru
Yet Lu does not specify what is misrepresented. As always accusations but no specifics or corrections.
The report shows past data was wrong and warming was more wide spread. This is what the daily mail says so how is that a misrepresentation?
Commentator
YES HE DOES. Lu's research was confined to one specific site in Antarctica. The Daily Mail falsely said it covered the entire globe. How much more specific can you get?
Liar. It certainly does not. What past data was wrong? Citation, please, author, journal, article, for data shown to be wrong by Lu's research.
One of these days, I have hopes for simple honesty from the denier brigade. Not only do you guys lie through your teeth on a daily basis, you don't even care that you do. You have no regard for the truth whatsoever.
The Top 5 Tactics of climate denial:
1. Cherry Picking 2. Fake Experts 3. Impossible Expectations 4. Misrepresenting the Science & Logical Fallacies 5. Conspiracy Theories
Diethelm & Mckee 2009
Honesty is not on the list.
Guru
It clearly show wide spread if it happened in Antarctica. That is far from the GW community saying it was only Europe.
The GW community is once again caught in lies and trying to justify it.
Commentator
Liar. Who in the GW community says it was only Europe? Citation: journal, author, date.
Oh wait ... you didn't think the Daily Mail reported that accurately, did you?
Last edited by Poor Debater; Apr 01 2012 at 08:40 AM.
The Top 5 Tactics of climate denial:
1. Cherry Picking 2. Fake Experts 3. Impossible Expectations 4. Misrepresenting the Science & Logical Fallacies 5. Conspiracy Theories
Diethelm & Mckee 2009
Honesty is not on the list.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks