Your limited intellectual capacity seems to preclude you from being able to understand that the magnitude and timing of temperatures vary between regions. Sad.
Originally Posted by Windigo
That would be wrong too. They can go back at for several thousand years
While their data hasn't been released I'm going to assume that like most Australian coral samples they only go back about 400 or so years and show a strong little ice age and their reliance beyond that point to the ever critical midieval warm period is entirely based on tree rings.
That would be a red herring and strawman fallacy. You are claiming that NZ temperature back to 1000 must have been much warmer than its 1100 estimate, because Greenland was. That is fallacious to begin with, as they are entirely different regiions. It's also highly naive given that Greenland and NZ data show a very different MWP from 1100 to the late 1300s.
Brake your tooth on the bumper yet. I'm not talking about ice cores in greenland. Just the historical prespective on what is considred teh midiveal warm period. You however are engaging in Loki's wager. Since we cant percicly define when the midieval warm period is we cannot discuss it. This isn't a logical fallacy for no reason. It is one of the most classic.
What is "my game" and if it's transparent, what is it?
I'm not a dwarf. I'm not going to play a stupid Loki's wager with you. You aren't that smart and your games are absolutely transparent.
Calculate averages for these 11 sets of 3 numbers. Don't be a coward.
"To the average American who’s struggling, we’re in some other stratosphere. We’re the party of Big Business and Big Oil and the rich." - Sen. Olympia Snowe (R)
Budget surplus inherited by Bush: $236 billion (CBO, 2000)
Budget deficit inherited by Obama: $1,667 billion (CBO projection, 3/2009)