If the United Nations’ Rio+20 Summit had been a Broadway play it closed with scathing reviews from everybody except the actors who performed:
Here’s a small sampling of the plot:It was a real bust of non-binding declarations, theatrics of Greenpeace unfurling an “Arctic Scroll” signed by Paul McCartney, Robert Redford and other Hollywood types (it will be planted at the North Pole on the seabed), and small countries signing pledges.
Ecuador shaking the can for donations is nothing more than a standard United Nations hustle, but the rest of us are in deep do-do when Maldives and Granada join forces.Maldives will “ban damaging fishing practices.” Ecuador asked for donations in exchange for agreeing to protect its own Yasuni National Forest rather than exploit the oil underneath the rainforest. Grenada will only use clean-energy sources by 2030.
This next bit had me scratching my head:
Environmental Floundering at failed Rio+20 SummitStrengthen the societal leadership of academia
Academia can form university partnerships with NGOs, community organizers, and government agencies to transform “the dominant social paradigm globally by opening new options and incentives to change.” (p. 71)
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh Sunday, June 24, 2012
Who the hell has been leading the environmental scam if not UN-approved scientists in the academy? And isn’t the University of East Anglia considered academia? Academia gave the world the big lie. Environmental hustlers of every stripe picked it up and ran with it. When they saw that it wasn’t working they resorted to telling little lies over and over again in order to reinforce the big lie. Labeling every mention of the global warming fraud a conspiracy theory was the little lie told most often.
My repeated attempts to connect environmental lies to the United Nations and global government was the cardinal sin. Liberals became angry at every hint of an environmental con job, but they went absolutely bonkers when the well-organized, well-funded, cartel working to establish a global government was exposed. Connecting the UN’s environmental fraud to global government invoked sarcastic cries of “Conspiracy nut” and worse.
The conspiracy charge worked so well for environmental hustlers and easily-manipulated fools every word opposing any part of liberalism/socialism was labeled a conspiracy theory. Never forget that the conspiracy gambit began with exposing the motives driving environmental ripoffs.
The conspiracy technique used to trivialize non-believers made those of us who have been posting on message boards for years more aware of what was happening than are most Americans. If a thing does not happen to you it usually does not register —— global warming liars counted on it.
In 12 years I’ve posted hundreds of messages about the UN and its plan to claim ownership of the atmosphere and the oceans. Christopher Monckton’s summery of the United Nations’ Rio+20 Summit is so concise and comprehensive I feel like I never said a word or posted a message. Monckton is so good TV talking heads burdened by time constraints can learn how it’s done. Please pay extra attention to the parts about global government: