Just another made-up excuse to raise taxes, impose even more onerous regulations and funnel money to Maurice Strong.
Just another made-up excuse to raise taxes, impose even more onerous regulations and funnel money to Maurice Strong.
ObamaTax Delendum Est
Look at 'em rave. How can they deny the problem, if we won't let them revise the language to match the official denialist PC lexicon? They seem to think that if they don't call it acidification, the problem magically vanishes.
Water runs from a pH of about 6.5 to 8.5. Below 7 it is said to be 'acidic' and above 7 it is said to be 'alkaline.' But it's still water, you can still drink it and grow plants in it etc. When water rises above 8.5 or below 6.5 it is no longer what we consider to be water.
Energy goes where intention flows.
For the past 20 years, I've been putting down sulfur to acidify my soil. Even though it's still alkaline soil, the term for adding sulfur is "soil acidification", because you're adding an acid. (Sort of. Sulfur isn't an acid, but bacteria turn it into sulfuric acid.) Nobody has ever called it "soil neutralization." Good of the denialists to inform me that the common term in use for the practice of adding acid has actually been a socialist plot started many decades ago.
When you get a chemical burn and you poor vinegar(an acid) on it is it called acidification or neutralization.Originally Posted by mamooth
(*)(*)(*)(*) them they aren't chemists. They have no more credibility applying terms for acid/basic chemistry than anyone else who has had CHEMII.Anyways, who to trust on this issue ... all of the world's oceanographers, or a couple denialist political cultists? Dang, that's a tough one.
Last edited by Windigo; Jul 14 2012 at 04:29 PM.
Mens Sana in Corpore Sano
Thanks for proving you don't know a thing about chemistry. CO2 is not an acid. There is a stage in the reaction where the CO2 and water for carbonic acid. But that is only one stage. Ultimately when ever a solution is neutralized you are left with a salt and water. That is why neutralization, acidification and basification are very specific and different terms because there is a different reaction going on.Originally Posted by politicalcenter
Last edited by Windigo; Jul 14 2012 at 04:42 PM.
Mens Sana in Corpore Sano
They just keep trying. You know, telling us that the common use of the language is wrong, because they so badly want that socialist conspiracy to exist. Apparently, this socialist conspiracy goes back many decades, because that's how long the term "acidification" has been used to describe adding an acid or acid-precursor.
Henry'sLaw indicates that:
1) The water only absorbs CO2 in proportion to partial pressure of CO2 in the air (very low)
2) Carbonic acid breaks down to CO2 and water to bring CO2 concentration into balance.
The tiny concentration of CO2 has little effect. Nitrogen forms nitric acid in water in proportion to its partial pressure (very high). Carbonic is trivial.
Go make up something more plausible.
ObamaTax Delendum Est
CO2 +H2O=H2CO3
When you add CO2 to water you get Carbonic acid.
You change the PH of the water.
And if you add the effect of suphur dioxide from burning coal...and acid rain.
Ph is determined by acid/base.
It could be sulfuric, carbonic, nitric, or any other acid.
Last edited by politicalcenter; Jul 15 2012 at 03:03 AM.
The truth is neither right or left...it is the truth.
Bookmarks