You (and your source) clearly misinterpreted their abstract. If you disagree, you can email Dr. Baker, co-author of the study. Considering you seem to have a consistently terrible time admitting you're wrong, I doubt you will.

http://www.atmos.washington.edu/baker.html

__________________
"You have shown what history teaches us - that at defining moments like this one, the change we need doesn't come from Washington. Change comes to Washington."

- President Barack Obama, 8/28/08

"To the average American who’s struggling, we’re in some other stratosphere. We’re the party of Big Business and Big Oil and the rich."

- Sen. Olympia Snowe (R)

Budget surplus inherited by Bush: $236 billion (CBO, 2000)

Budget deficit inherited by Obama: $1,667 billion (CBO projection, 3/2009)

Why don't you e-mail her? Again, you are the one who is so obviously and utterly misinterpreting not only what they are saying but adding more into it than what they are saying. Then you expect me to do your homework and prove myself wrong? What arrogance! Do your own home work pal, YOU E-MAIL HER!

__________________
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. -- Ann Coulter
"I am personally opposed to shooting abortionists, but I don't want to impose my moral values on others." -- Ann Coulter on Fox News 6/22/09
“I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born.” -- Ronald Reagan

__________________
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. -- Ann Coulter
"I am personally opposed to shooting abortionists, but I don't want to impose my moral values on others." -- Ann Coulter on Fox News 6/22/09
“I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born.” -- Ronald Reagan

I know I am correct...Why does that sound funny then?
These articles are intended to debunk AGW theory either as a whole or some aspect of the studies which support AGW. While some may prove only that the science behind supporters of AGW is faulty, others may seek to provide alternative explainations of why the Earth's climate is behaving as it has/is/will. Taken as a whole I would say that these articles put to shame the scientists and the politically correct garbage they are pushing on the governments and the people of the world. Don't worry, I'm sure there are many more article by AGW skeptics that I have not yet posted, as well as those yet to be wrritten.

__________________
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. -- Ann Coulter
"I am personally opposed to shooting abortionists, but I don't want to impose my moral values on others." -- Ann Coulter on Fox News 6/22/09
“I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born.” -- Ronald Reagan

You can forget about the graphs of European temperatures. Europe is not global.
And from the Loehle reconstruction :
"The mean series shows the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and Little Ice Age (LIA) quite clearly, with the MWP being approximately 0.3°C warmer than 20th century values at these eighteen sites."

Can you tell me what the equivalent of .3 C is in Fahrenheit? I'll give you a hint: it ain't 7 degrees.
I'm also curious which 18 sites?
I've commented on your graph; care to comment on mine or will you just ignore it?

__________________
"No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong." — Albert Einstein
"Science is the process that takes us from confusion to understanding..." — Brian Greene
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan

As I thought, you are too scared. You're making the erroneous claim that the study "debunks AGW" when in fact it hurts the denialist cause. You obviously haven't done your homework. Hint: stick with credible sources.

__________________
"You have shown what history teaches us - that at defining moments like this one, the change we need doesn't come from Washington. Change comes to Washington."

- President Barack Obama, 8/28/08

"To the average American who’s struggling, we’re in some other stratosphere. We’re the party of Big Business and Big Oil and the rich."

- Sen. Olympia Snowe (R)

Budget surplus inherited by Bush: $236 billion (CBO, 2000)

Budget deficit inherited by Obama: $1,667 billion (CBO projection, 3/2009)

Also an Energy and Environment publication:

1. It's a sub-standard journal, not even listed on ISI's Journal Citation Report

2. It's a journal set up for global warming skeptics, thus no credible balanced independent peer reviews

3. The editor has even admitted to following a political agenda.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_and_Environment

So it's about as useful as a self-published study. RC took the time to comment on it awhile back (a bit technical):

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...constructions/

Your curiosity regarding the 18 sites...

"What does this imply for Loehle's reconstruction? Unfortunately, the number of unsuitable series, errors in dating and transcription, combined with a mis-interpretation of what was being averaged, and a lack of validation, do not leave very much to discuss. Of the 18 original records, only 5 are potentially useful for comparing late 20th Century temperatures to medieval times, and they don't have enough coverage to say anything significant about global trends. It's not clear to me what impact fixing the various problems would be or what that would imply for the error bars, but as it stands, this reconstruction unfortunately does not add anything to the discussion."

__________________
"You have shown what history teaches us - that at defining moments like this one, the change we need doesn't come from Washington. Change comes to Washington."

- President Barack Obama, 8/28/08

"To the average American who’s struggling, we’re in some other stratosphere. We’re the party of Big Business and Big Oil and the rich."

- Sen. Olympia Snowe (R)

Budget surplus inherited by Bush: $236 billion (CBO, 2000)

Budget deficit inherited by Obama: $1,667 billion (CBO projection, 3/2009)

That makes this:even funnier.
so does 1)"debunk AGW theory as a whole"
2)"or some aspect of the studies which support AGW."
3)"prove only that the science behind supporters of AGW is faulty"
4)"provide alternative explainations of why the Earth's climate is behaving as it has/is/will."
5) none of the above

BTW, I choose #5.

__________________
"No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong." — Albert Einstein
"Science is the process that takes us from confusion to understanding..." — Brian Greene
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan

Thanks for the extra info.
I just realized that Loehle paper questions the tree ring proxies. But this page page shows that other proxies are in agreement. None of the proxies show the MWP as being 7 degrees F warmer.

__________________
"No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong." — Albert Einstein
"Science is the process that takes us from confusion to understanding..." — Brian Greene
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan

Explain Jan.2008.