I heavily disagree. The »Bosniacs« and »Kosovarians«/»Albanians« are in fact Turks that came to the Balkans as conquerors several hundred years ago. It were the Turks who used force, and the Serbians were and are only acting in self-defence - then and now. Something that is wrong does not become right just because you manage to perpetuate the wrong-doing for several hundred years.

I think `several hundred years` is a bit beyond the cut-off point for redress.

__________________
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
Marx (G.)

Not when strangers from another continent occupy your beloved fatherland.

All right, even if we accept this logic and allow you to "kick the muslim out" after several hundreds of years, would you please be so kind and explain why the Croats got whipped over it? <Watch out for ethnic accusations that all of these people on the balkan were in reality TURKS>.

And to the other person that claimed several thousand serbs being killed by Albanian militia in one night, I would like to see proof of it from a trusted source.

Further more, start tallying up the mass graves the Serbs filled with bodies and you will realize that they dished out way before they were on the receiving end. Very much like the Germans that got their butt kicked, the Serbs deserve and deserved every bit of what's coming to them.

For all I care, we should have built huge walls around that (*)(*)(*)(*)ed place Yugoslavia, given everyone enough weapons and let these idiots eradicate one another and simply come in and mop up what's left! Maybe it would have solved itself....

So you think that people who defend their fatherland from foreign intruders or try to free it from their grasp »deserve to get their butt kicked«? Now at last I understand why it was necessary for the Red Indians in northern America to get their butt kicked.

I can agree when you think that no outsiders should have interfered in Yugoslavia. But president Clinton saw it in a different way, I'm afraid.

Does New York belong to the Iroquois in your mind? Should Brittany be returned to Britain? Gibraltar given to Spain?

How can it be `beloved` if they haven`t had it for hundreds of years and so many generations?

Sounds like rhetoric and BS to me.

__________________
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
Marx (G.)

Well then let's start dividing up what is today Poland and let Germany demand back what was taken 62 years ago. Should Austria then be re-united with Hungary? Where would this take us???
How about oh... maybe Palestine? Who would own that? Who would own Iran/Iraq after all I am sure you will find a beduine who can lay claim to the land. Maybe we would have to return bigger parts of China to the Mongols. After all they conquered it in the 11th century...

They are part of your world. Accept it. You should also accept the fact that you can't always have back what you lost. Guess you have never quite gotten that lesson in Pre-K.

Clinton and every other statesman and human being saw what was being done on the Balkans for what it was. It was cold blooded murder, ethnic cleansing, you tried a pathetic version of the "Final Solution". You failed because you were to dumb to learn from history.
No matter what ethnic group or religion they belong to. If you think you must kill one another, we ought to facilitate death equally, quickly and fairly and finish it in a hurry so we can be home for dinner and not have to worry about some fool to wait a couple of decades, centuries or longer to start bringing it up again.

.