<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Political Forum - Health Care</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalforum.com</link>
		<description>Discuss the health care system(s) available in various countries.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:58:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Foreign Aid</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/146268-foreign-aid-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:32:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>From 2000-2007 The federal government spent $214 billion of our tax dollars on Foreign aid.
One third of this went to Egypt and Israel. 
Both of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>From 2000-2007 The federal government spent $214 billion of our tax dollars on Foreign aid.<br />
One third of this went to Egypt and Israel. <br />
Both of these countries have universal health care. <br />
Much of this money that we distribute to other nations is &quot;lost&quot; stolen or wasted. <br />
The largest percentage of this money goes to fund foreign militaries. <br />
There are many instances that large sums have ended up in the private bank accounts of these countries leadership.<br />
Is it to much to ask that what MY tax dollars fund be used to help citizens of the United States. <br />
We need to take care of our own before we take care of the rest of the world. <br />
<a href="Http://ourvoicesheard.com" target="_blank">Http://ourvoicesheard.com</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/">Health Care</category>
			<dc:creator>ourvoicesheard.com</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/146268-foreign-aid.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Health Care Law 60% Favor Repeal of Health Care Law, 50% Say Repeal Would Benefit Ec</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/145828-health-care-law-60-favor-repeal-health-care-law-50-say-repeal-would-benefit-ec-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:08:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[This is down a little bit from the 68% just after passage.  I do not believe Obamacare will ever see the light of day in 2014 when it is sup[posed to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This is down a little bit from the 68&#37; just after passage.  I do not believe Obamacare will ever see the light of day in 2014 when it is sup[posed to be up and running.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Monday, August 16, 2010<br />
                                   <br />
                 <br />
  Support for repeal of the health care reform bill is at its highest  level in over a month, while the number of voters who believe repeal  will be good for the economy has reached a new high. <br />
               The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Voters  shows that 60% at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care reform  law, while 36% oppose repeal. <br />
               Those numbers include 50% who Strongly Favor repeal and 26% who Strongly Oppose it. <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/platinum_service_description" target="_blank">Platinum Members</a> can see <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/platinum/state_response_tables/arizona_immigration_law_state_by_state" target="_blank">state-by-state results</a> from across the country. <br />
               The number that favors repeal is up five points from <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2010/55_favor_repeal_of_health_care_law" target="_blank">last week</a>  and is the highest level measured since July 1. The number that  Strongly Favors repeal also ties the highest level ever - first measured  in mid-April. <br />
               Overall support for repeal has ranged from 52% to 63% since the law was passed by Congress in March. <br />
               Fifty percent (50%) of voters now say repeal of the bill will be good  for the economy. That's up six points from the end of July and is the  highest result found since the question was first posed in April.  Twenty-six percent (26%) say repeal of the bill would be bad for the  economy, while another 15% say it will have no impact. <br />
               The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on August 13-14, 2010 by  Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage  points with a 95%level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen  Reports surveys is conducted by <a href="http://www.pulseopinionresearch.com/" target="_blank">Pulse Opinion Research, LLC</a>. See <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/about_us/methodology" target="_blank">methodology</a>. <br />
               But voters are not as convinced that repeal would lead to the creation  of more jobs. While 33% say a repeal of the bill would lead to more job  creation, 30% disagree. Thirty-seven percent (37%) more are not sure.  Still, the number of voters who believe the law's repeal would lead to  increased job creation is also the highest level measured yet. <br />
               Thirty-nine percent (39%) of voters believe it is at least somewhat  likely the bill will be repealed, showing no change from July. Forty-six  percent (46%) say the law is not likely to be repealed. This includes  15% who say repeal is Very Likely and eight percent 98%) who say it is  Not At All Likely to happen. <br />
               Fifty percent (50%) believe the health care reform plan will be bad for  the economy, down slightly from results found over the past several  weeks. Thirty-nine percent (39%) say the law will be good for the  economy, the highest result found since mid-July. <br />
               Republicans continue to strongly favor repeal of the health care bill,  while a majority of Democrats oppose repeal. Most voters not affiliated  with either major political party also favor the bill's repeal. <br />
               Nearly three-out-of-four voters in the <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/ideology/62_hold_populist_or_mainstream_views" target="_blank">Political Class</a> oppose repeal of the bill, while a strong majority of Mainstream voters favor repeal. <br />
               Separate polling shows that <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2010/54_oppose_health_insurance_requirement_in_new_health_law" target="_blank">54%  of U.S. voters oppose the requirement in the new federal health care  bill that every American must buy or obtain health insurance</a>.  Forty-three percent (43%) favor the requirement, which was on the losing  end of a vote in Missouri last Tuesday and is being challenged in court  by a number of states. <br />
               Please sign up for the Rasmussen Reports <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/daily_updates" target="_blank">daily e-mail update </a>(it's free) or follow us on <a href="http://twitter.com/RasmussenPoll" target="_blank">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Asbury-Park-NJ/Rasmussen-Reports/86959124863?ref=nf" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. Let us keep you up to date with the latest public opinion news. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law" target="_blank">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...ealth_care_law</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/">Health Care</category>
			<dc:creator>NaturalBorn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/145828-health-care-law-60-favor-repeal-health-care-law-50-say-repeal-would-benefit-ec.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medical Consequences Of What Homosexuals Do</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/144676-medical-consequences-what-homosexuals-do-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*MEDICAL  CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT HOMOSEXUALS DO*

 *By  Paul Cameron, Ph.D.*

 *Dr. Cameron* is  Chariman of the Family  Research Institute...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><font color="#660033">MEDICAL  CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT HOMOSEXUALS DO</font></font></b><br />
<br />
 <b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><font color="#000000">By  Paul Cameron, Ph.D.</font></font></b><br />
<br />
 <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><font size="-1"><b>Dr. Cameron</b> is  Chariman of the <a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/index.html" target="_blank">Family  Research Institute</a> of Colorado Springs, Colorado USA. <a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#info" target="_blank">Click here</a>  for more information about this organization. You may contact him at: Family  Research Institute, PO Box 62640, Colorado Springs, CO 80962 USA. Phone number:  (303) 681-3113. </font></font> <br />
   <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Throughout history, the major civilizations major  religions condemned homosexuality.<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">1</a>  Until 1961 homosexual acts were illegal throughout America.</font><br />
 <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Gays claim that the &quot;prevailing  attitude toward homosexuals in the U.S. and many other countries is revulsion  and hostility....for acts and desires not harmful to anyone.&quot;<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">3</a>  The American Psychological Association and the American Public Health  Association assured the U.S. Supreme Court in 1986 that &quot;no significant data  show that engaging in...oral and anal sex, results in mental or physical  dysfunction.&quot;<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">4</a></font><br />
 <b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">What Homosexuals  Do</font></b><br />
<br />
 <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The major surveys on homosexual  behavior are summarized below. Two things stand out 1) homosexuals behave  similarly world-over, and 2) as Harvard Medical Professor, Dr. William  Haseltine,<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">33</a>  noted in 1993, the &quot;changes in sexual behavior that have been reported to have  occurred in some groups have proved, for the most part, to be transient. For  example, bath houses and sex clubs in many cities have either reopened or were  never closed.&quot;</font><br />
 <b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Homosexual Activities (in  %)</font></b><br />
<br />
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">        <font face="Courier New, Courier, mono">US</font></font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"><font size="+1"><a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">16</a></font></font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"> US</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"><font size="+1"><a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">13</a></font></font> <font face="Courier New, Courier, mono">US    US</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"><font size="+1"><a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">18</a></font></font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"> Denmark</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"><a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">20</a></font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"> US</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"><font size="+1"><a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">19</a></font></font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono">  London</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"><font size="+1"><a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">27</a></font></font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono">   Sydney/London</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono"><font size="+1"><a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">26</a></font></font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono">                                                            Canada</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono">25</font><font face="Courier New, Courier, mono">                                                      <br />
          1940s1977 83/84  1983  1984   1983    1985       1991                       <br />
          ever ever  ever in yr in yr  in mo   in mo   last 6mo                                                                                  <br />
oral/penile       83   99  100/99  99    86             67                 <br />
anal/penile       68   91   93/98  95    92     95     100                 <br />
oral/anal         59   83   92/92  63           69      89       55/65       <br />
urine sex         10   23    29/                                              <br />
fisting/toys      22   41/47 34                                       <br />
fecal sex-eating        4     8                                                       <br />
enemas                   11    11                                               <br />
torture sex       22   37    37                                              <br />
public/orgy sex   61   76    88                                               <br />
sex with minors   37   23    24/   </font> <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b><font size="+1"><br />
ORAL SEX  </font></b>Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest  semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the  blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human  blood, with all its medical risks. Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and  often will have been in unsanitary places such as a rectum), individuals so  involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and  hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated  that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">17,27</a>),  and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1105 different partners/year, the  potential for infection is considerable.</font><br />
 <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b><font size="+1">RECTAL  SEX</font></b> Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal  intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of  daily sexual diaries,<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">3</a>  gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.</font><br />
 <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Rectal sex is dangerous. During  rectal intercourse the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs  and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient's own feces, 3) whatever germs,  infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the  inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell  thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is  very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access  to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot  penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present),<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">7</a>  rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread  hepatitis B, HIV syphilis and a host of other blood-borne diseases.</font><br />
 <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Tearing or ripping of the anal wall  is especially likely with &quot;fisting,&quot; where the hand and arm is inserted into the  rectum. It is also common when &quot;toys&quot; are employed (homosexual lingo for objects  which are inserted into the rectum--bottles, carrots, even gerbils<a href="http://familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html#references" target="_blank">8</a>).  The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such  &quot;sport&quot; is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey's time that he  didn't think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to  doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do  so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life.</font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/">Health Care</category>
			<dc:creator>NaturalBorn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/health-care/144676-medical-consequences-what-homosexuals-do.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
