<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Political Forum - Warfare / Military</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/</link>
		<description>For anything related to combat, peace efforts, etc. Post here or choose a subcategory.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:51:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>30</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Had the US lost at the Battle of Midway</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/303284-had-us-lost-battle-midway-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:15:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Any thoughts of what effect it would have had? I imagine the Pacfic war would have been more defensive and utilizing submarines and land based...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Any thoughts of what effect it would have had? I imagine the Pacfic war would have been more defensive and utilizing submarines and land based aircraft to hold the Japanese to the west of Hawaii.<br />
<br />
Thoughts?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/">Warfare / Military</category>
			<dc:creator>LivingNDixie</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/303284-had-us-lost-battle-midway.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Play Cold War game for free for one day</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/303210-play-cold-war-game-free-one-day-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>www.thecoldwarera.com 
 
You can participate in contest to play this game for free for one day - https://www.facebook.com/GrandStrategy</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.thecoldwarera.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">www.thecoldwarera.com</a><br />
<br />
You can participate in contest to play this game for free for one day - <a href="https://www.facebook.com/GrandStrategy" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/GrandStrategy</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/">Warfare / Military</category>
			<dc:creator>MaxRiga</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/303210-play-cold-war-game-free-one-day.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>70th Anniversary of the Dambusters Raid</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/303020-70th-anniversary-dambusters-raid-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Today (May 16th) is the seventieth anniversary of the raid by 617 squadron of the Royal Air Force ("The Dambusters") on the great dams of the Ruhr...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Today (May 16th) is the seventieth anniversary of the raid by 617 squadron of the Royal Air Force (&quot;The Dambusters&quot;) on the great dams of the Ruhr Valley in Germany.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-22214869" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-22214869</a><br />
<br />
19 Avro Lancaster aircraft of 617 squadron of Bomber Command set off from their base at Scampton in Lincolnshire to fly to the Ruhr Valley and attack three major dams - the Mohne, the Eder and the Sorpe.  They were carrying a revolutionary weapon, the &quot;bouncing bomb&quot;.<br />
<br />
Only 10 of the aircraft returned to base.  9 aircraft were shot down or crashed with the loss of 53 Bomber Command aircrew.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/">Warfare / Military</category>
			<dc:creator>Socialism Works</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/303020-70th-anniversary-dambusters-raid.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Soviet military vs U.S.</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302772-soviet-military-vs-u-s-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 01:54:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm just wanting some opinions on which country had a better military overall during the cold war.  My opinion is that if the cold war went hot and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm just wanting some opinions on which country had a better military overall during the cold war.  My opinion is that if the cold war went hot and most fighting was in Europe, the Soviet Union would have won at any point in time during the cold war.  The Soviet Union had both very good technology and huge numbers for its land forces.  For example, in terms of tanks, the Soviet Union was usually 10 years ahead of the U.S. technologically and produced huge numbers of these tanks.  The Soviet Union had a slightly weaker air force than the U.S., but it had by far the best air defenses of any country.  Overall, the air war would have been fairly even.  The U.S. always has had a far better navy than the Soviet Union, so the U.S. can project force anywhere in the world while the Soviets could only project force in Europe and Asia, though in the Soviet's case, there is no need to project force anywhere else.  If it came to it, I think the Soviet Union was more prepared for a nuclear or chemical war as well.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/">Warfare / Military</category>
			<dc:creator>oldjar07</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302772-soviet-military-vs-u-s.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nuclear powered escorts.</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302644-nuclear-powered-escorts-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:04:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>For a while the US Navy had nuclear powered cruiser and destroyers, which seems like a good idea to have all nuclear powered ships, rather than just...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>For a while the US Navy had nuclear powered cruiser and destroyers, which seems like a good idea to have all nuclear powered ships, rather than just the submarines and aircraft carriers. So why did the US Navy do away with the idea of nuclear powered escorts?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/">Warfare / Military</category>
			<dc:creator>william walker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302644-nuclear-powered-escorts.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pick your group of attack helicopters.....</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302377-pick-your-group-attack-helicopters-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 01:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>As per... 
 
Three groups, each with three models.  Consider all aspects, and you can select what you think the strongest overall group is. 
 
Group...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As per...<br />
<br />
Three groups, each with three models.  Consider all aspects, and you can select what you think the strongest overall group is.<br />
<br />
Group A -  AH-64D Apache Long Bow, A-129/T-129 ,AH-1W Super Cobra <br />
<br />
Group B - Kamov KA-50/KA-52, AH-1Z Viper, AH-2 Rooivalk <br />
<br />
Group C -  MI-28H Havoc , Eurocopter Tiger ,MI-24 Hind<br />
<br />
<font color="silver">- - - Updated - - -</font><br />
<br />
I'd go A.<br />
<br />
:thumbsup:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/">Warfare / Military</category>
			<dc:creator>Jack Napier</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302377-pick-your-group-attack-helicopters.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Three rapes happen every hour in US military</title>
			<link>http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302338-three-rapes-happen-every-hour-us-military-new-post.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 17:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20130509/amin20130509172905997.jpg  
 
A new report by the US Defense Department, Pentagon, says almost three...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20130509/amin20130509172905997.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
A new report by the US Defense Department, Pentagon, says almost three rapes occur every hour in the US military, raising serious concern about the soaring rate of sexual assault among US servicemen.<br />
<br />
According to the Pentagon, sexual assaults in the military have increased to the alarming level of 70 per day or three every hour, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
The report added that 26,000 service members were sexually assaulted in 2012, a 35-percent increase since 2010 when 19,000 such cases were reported.<br />
<br />
However, the overall rate of sexual assault in the US military may be higher, as many victims fail to report out of fear of vengeance or lack of justice under the military’s system of prosecution, the report added.<br />
<br />
“The more closed and hierarchical an institution is, the more the victim is stigmatized and the rapist gets away with it,” said Susan Brooks, pastor and volunteer rape crisis counselor.<br />
<br />
Brooks went on to condemn the US military for maintaining a culture of gender and power relations, which she says produces the rape culture among service members.<br />
<br />
Many high-ranking US military commanders have recently been convicted and relieved of duties for multiple sexual offenses and corruption over the years.<br />
<br />
On May 6, authorities said Lieutenant Colonel Jeff Krusinski, director of the sexual assault prevention program for the US Air Force, has himself been detained for sexually assaulting a woman not far from the military headquarters in Arlington, Virginia.<br />
<br />
In 2012, over 30 male Air Force boot camp trainers were cited for sexually harassing, abusing and raping at least 59 military recruits at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/09/302658/3-rapes-occur-every-hour-in-us-military/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05...n-us-military/</a><br />
<br />
and this is not like the invasions where they say &quot;What happens in, stays in..&quot; It is even in their own army.. So sad..</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/">Warfare / Military</category>
			<dc:creator>AliJ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.politicalforum.com/warfare-military/302338-three-rapes-happen-every-hour-us-military.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
