Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry
Now, I really dislike it. Although spoken words could be described as vibrations in the air, they do contain a meaning and a feeling for those who understand the language.
Themeaning of swear words is usually a coarse way of describing things (some of which are beautiful e.g. making love). They usually have some sort of ugly connotations, even violent and intentionally shocking.
|
We can use other words that have the exact same meaning as a swear word and it's still acceptable. It has to be just the sound the word produces that offends us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-D-P
Lets all remember one thing here.
Freedom of speech does not apply on this board or any message board that has a TOS. You agreed to the TOS, and in the TOS it states. "By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws."
It is up to the Mods and the Admin on how strictly they enforce these rules.
You gave up your freedom of speech the second you clicked on the box. "The owners of Political Forum reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason."
Now that being said. I believe that profanity is protected by the First Amendment. But fighting words are not.
|
Yeah, I'm not really trying to get them to change the rules. I probably should have posted this in the off topic section.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpankyTheWhale
In a debate, ideas should flourish and there should be absolute freedom in order to arrive at the Actual Truth. Profane words are, in the vast majority of cases, weak of ideas and tend to show a lack of restraint and focus in the utterer.
|
A word by itself contains no ideas or any explanation of an idea. It takes multiple words to explain an idea and if a profane word is used within the statement it does not make the argument any more weaker.