Except that there are plenty of examples of homosexuality in nature.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals

And in ants, for example, 99.99999% of the population is sterile and can't reproduce. Yet ants do just fine.

And there are plenty of heterosexual sexual practices that cannot lead to pregnancy, either.

__________________
Man up.

True yet in ants the queen is the one having all the babies.

True. And in humans the 90% of nonhomosexuals have the babies. That doesn't make homosexuality unnatural.

__________________
Man up.

Just curious, how do you reconcile that in the LDS faith?

__________________
"I know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution." March 4, 1869, Grant's First Inaugural Address

Sorry I don't understand the question.

Those are genetic defects, malfunctions, homosexuality has no biological purpose and nature does not purposely produce things without a function.

__________________
In times of universal deceit the love of truth becomes the most radical of all ideologies.

Still a Caveman? - Your Mind is Controlled - The Brainwashing of the West - Your thoughts are not your own

Veritax Vox Liberabit

I mean some people seem to enjoy sex with dead bodies, animals, children, and whatever. Those are obviously all genetic malfunctions, something went wrong with the sexual orientation in such cases.

__________________
In times of universal deceit the love of truth becomes the most radical of all ideologies.

Still a Caveman? - Your Mind is Controlled - The Brainwashing of the West - Your thoughts are not your own

Veritax Vox Liberabit

Wow. You should publish a scientific paper if you can prove that. You'd be famous.

Actually, nature produces plenty of things without function -- like male nipples.

But even if homosexuality doesn't have a purpose, it doesn't follow that homosexuals should be discriminated against.

That said, there are plenty of theories as to what the function of homosexuality might be:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB403.html

Note the last one in particular: families with a history of homosexuality tend to be more fertile.

__________________
Man up.

And some people like to be spanked during sex. There are plenty of sexual practices that are not practiced by the majority of people. Why do they necessarily have to be the result of a "malfunction"?

More to the point, if the practice involves consenting adults, why do such people need to be discriminated against?

__________________
Man up.

Because I accept the premise that homosexuals did not choose to be homosexual (just like I know full well I never chose to be heterosexual), that makes homosexuality totally natural. Nature made them that way for whatever reason. And no, I don't care what the reason is.

__________________
Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?