Thread: Don't Like Gay Pedophilia? Change Your Summer Plans...Boycott California

Yes, it's a "giant leap" from indoctrinating kids to worship a gay pedophile to NAMBLA gaining a foothold.

Johnny, did you get a D-minus in logic in high school?

I explained to you in another thread that this is hardly the outrage you make it out to be. Milk was in a relationship that was fully legal in over half the states in the country at the time

But it wasn't legal in New York at the time, where the crimes began. And it wasn't legal age in California at the time. And most importantly, that age STILL isn't legal in California. Pay attention here: California is mandating that Harvey Milk be celebrated as "the embodiment of the GLBT movement". And yet he as that embodiment was sodomizing a minor. That's bad enough. But it gets worse. Also in California [the important state because remember, this is where the law exists in practice today to force kids to emulate Milk] it is illegal to have sex with someone who is intoxicated or mentally ill. The minor Harvey milk sodomized was a drug addict and mentally ill at the time the statutory rape was committed. So thats three felonies against a child committed by Milk...ACCORDING TO CALIFORNIA LAWS....where the emulation of that same felon, BY CHILDREN, is required by law.

So the solution to California's transgressions against children is to boycott vacationing there until they wake up and smell the indoctrinated pedophilia..

Originally Posted by Silhouette

...Johnny, did you get a D-minus in logic in high school?...

I have a request:

Stop seeking to vilify homosexual people.

Would you do that for me?

Thanks.

You aren't "homosexual people". You as an individual are deficient and cannot see the connection between promoting Harvey Milk in schools and the spread of the NAMBLA ideals. What you do in your bedroom is irrelevant to that observation.

So far 73% of responders are for boycotting California until they change their stance on indoctrinated pedophilia..apparently they can make the connection that you cannot Johnny.

Originally Posted by Silhouette

You aren't "homosexual people".

Yeah, I am. (I fit within that group.)

You as an individual are deficient and cannot see the connection between promoting Harvey Milk in schools and the spread of the NAMBLA ideals.

You assume that is what's happening. You are leaping to HUGE conclusions; it is simply laughable, and reflects an obsession on your part. You're just vilifying homosexual people, and reasonable person can see that.

What you do in your bedroom is irrelevant to that observation.

Harvey Milk presented as an historical figure, does not spread the ideals of NAMBLA; you are sensationalizing things for the purpose of promoting your own agenda. That is obvious.

So far 73% of responders are for boycotting California until they change their stance on indoctrinated pedophilia..apparently they can make the connection that you cannot Johnny.

Your poll represents the bigotry and homophobia you have been able to generate here in this forum; that is all that means.

Originally Posted by Silhouette

You aren't "homosexual people". You as an individual are deficient and cannot see the connection between promoting Harvey Milk in schools and the spread of the NAMBLA ideals. What you do in your bedroom is irrelevant to that observation.

Just a question for you: Did you support George W. Bush? Yes or no?

Absolutely not. And if you read any of my other posts on politics [see universal healthcare, Dick Cheney, BigOil, Bignuke etc.] you would know that already. Dubya and Cheney will go down as the Laurel and Hardy of evil in the history books. Singlehandedly [nearly, except for his puppets] Dick Cheney is probably the man most responsible for the Western collapse going on today. In a million subtle and not so subtle ways his influences have reached across the aisle to gain the cooperation of even the democrats. The man is so addicted to his own power that he would bring down the world just to feel that rush..

I'm a registered democrat and an environmental pragmatist if you must pigeonhole me. There it is. And yes, it's OK to be pragmatic and be against teaching gay sex with boys to kids. In fact, pragmatism and being against that go hand in hand..

Originally Posted by Silhouette

Yes, it's a "giant leap" from indoctrinating kids to worship a gay pedophile to NAMBLA gaining a foothold.

Johnny, did you get a D-minus in logic in high school?



But it wasn't legal in New York at the time, where the crimes began. And it wasn't legal age in California at the time. And most importantly, that age STILL isn't legal in California. Pay attention here: California is mandating that Harvey Milk be celebrated as "the embodiment of the GLBT movement". And yet he as that embodiment was sodomizing a minor. That's bad enough. But it gets worse. Also in California [the important state because remember, this is where the law exists in practice today to force kids to emulate Milk] it is illegal to have sex with someone who is intoxicated or mentally ill. The minor Harvey milk sodomized was a drug addict and mentally ill at the time the statutory rape was committed. So thats three felonies against a child committed by Milk...ACCORDING TO CALIFORNIA LAWS....where the emulation of that same felon, BY CHILDREN, is required by law.

So the solution to California's transgressions against children is to boycott vacationing there until they wake up and smell the indoctrinated pedophilia..

Originally Posted by Johnny-C

I have a request:

Stop seeking to vilify homosexual people.

Would you do that for me?

Thanks.

psssttt....hey, Silly? Can I call you Silly? I've got some news to report to you...See, Harvey Milk Day's come and passed. No new homo children were indoctrinated during those 24 hours. No diddles were diddled those 24 hours. Ok? Unwad the panties and pack them away for another year, alrighty now?

You either believe that asking kids to emulate a known and admitted gay pedophile as their hero is a foothold to NAMBLA or you don't. We apparently disagree on that point. I say it is. You're playing dumb pretending you can't see a connection. You're asking others to be just as willfully blind. I'm banking when it comes to their kids, they won't be. I'm banking that some of the people who say they're going to avoid California as a tourist destination will do just that until they feel the state is safe to bring children into.

You don't see this as freaking people out. I do. Maybe your hand-picked polls are telling you one thing but the word on the street is that gay is passe' and actually becoming quite alarming. It's like the demands keep getting weirder and more intense from the gays every week. And that's usually what one can predict with untreated mental illness...more and more bombastic unreflective behavior and delusions until the men with the tight white suit come to take you away to the padded cell.. ie: people know insanity when it smacks them upside the head.

Originally Posted by Silhouette

Absolutely not. And if you read any of my other posts on politics [see universal healthcare, Dick Cheney, BigOil, Bignuke etc.] you would know that already. Dubya and Cheney will go down as the Laurel and Hardy of evil in the history books. Singlehandedly [nearly, except for his puppets] Dick Cheney is probably the man most responsible for the Western collapse going on today. In a million subtle and not so subtle ways his influences have reached across the aisle to gain the cooperation of even the democrats. The man is so addicted to his own power that he would bring down the world just to feel that rush..

I'm a registered democrat and an environmental pragmatist if you must pigeonhole me. There it is. And yes, it's OK to be pragmatic and be against teaching gay sex with boys to kids. In fact, pragmatism and being against that go hand in hand..

I see. So, you voted for Clinton and Obama?

Yes, enthusiastically for Clinton and yes, un-enthusiastically for Obama.