Thread: Rape

Originally Posted by Blasphemer

I think it is normal. Note that I am talking about sexual pleasure only (which is mostly beyond conscious control)...

Man... I really don't think you are correct about that. Something you're assuming just seems "off" to me.

In time, I'll have to research this more so I'll know better.

Here I go again with a sitting on the fence response. Earlier in the thread it was mentioned that the domination thesis sits alongside the sexual one. That makes sense to me. What doesn't make sense to me is the idea that rape is only about domination and power. The old common law definition of rape used to be shortened to a vulgar but useful set of dot points:

f'ing by force, fear or fraud

A quick think about that crude definition reveals that there are elements of violent domination and power but also a bit of sneakiness by some horney bastard. The fraud bit is seen in cases where the rapist misrepresents the act or his identity.

Originally Posted by Slyhunter

Something stuck out sharply in a story I just read.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...,4487634.story
How does this stop gay rape?
This is an argument to not allow gay's to be Prison Guards. And if they can't be prison guards why is it ok for them to be in the military?
Because a guy being searched by a gay will not help prevent rape at all!

Much less showering with him.

Right.

How many gay guards rape inmates?