Thread: The global revolutionary events (Earth Hour, Earth Day, Kony)

Over the last couple of years, if you are aware, you notice an increase in global revolutionary events. That are Earth Hour, Earth Day and Kony.
These events cause the same thing, trying to let people world wide do the same thing. They let people believe in these events. Earth Hour does not help to make the air cleaner by switching off the lights for one hour, Earth Day is to appriciate the ecosystem, but nobody can change the fuel/gas consumption that polutes, elites/govs keep their system from chaning to a cleaner/greener one, get rid of oil/nuclear (to an advanced sustainable real enviromental friendly system, and surpress the real green energies, keep propagating the people with solar and wind, while tidal and geothermical are inexhaustable do not need recyling or stop producing energy if there is no wind), and Kony does again do the same thing, try to make the world aware of one criminal on the run, what they try to do is if there is a criminal on the run one day they can put the whole world in motion to find that criminal, and bring him/her to justice (sounds good, but acts against free humanity, it is a way to create one world that is acting in the same way, all the same (this is a utopic idea, artificial), all the same behaviour, this is what you still see in North Korea today, and saw in Germany last century. Masses of people that act in the same way. They try to create one world with mindless the same acting people.
This globally organizing works in the same way as the movie, Invasion of the bodysnatchers, in the end everybody has become the same (even the last uninfected soul), also looks like e.g the movie Equalibrium, a nazi type system with all the same acting people, if you act different, if you make a thought mistake you are in big trouble (an insane situation, they try to do this globally by adding more of these global revolutionary events, they push for it)
This kind of stuff is increasing (always using red and black as main colours, mind war part) It works like a virus in the mind, you don't notice that you are infected by it. They try to let more and more people join them to do the same thing globally (by e.g putting propaganda for these events on Google in a nice way) They try to cause a global revolution.
Over the past decade they have tried to cause revolution in the streets of America, via 9/11 (ae911truth), via Wearechange, other truth organisations, via OWS, via the RP revolution as well, and now we see these global revolutionary things happening more and more.

Uncle Ferd says "Yea, who's in charge?...

The ‘real’ world crisis lays in a global deficit of leadership
Wed, Jun 27, 2012 - Leaders today have to ask their people to share burdens, not just benefits. That requires extraordinary leadership that has to start with telling people the truth

Traveling in Europe last week, it seemed as if every other conversation ended with some form of this question: Why does it feel like so few leaders are capable of inspiring their people to meet the challenges of our day? There are many explanations for this global leadership deficit, but I would focus on two: one generational, one technological.

Let’s start with the technological. In 1965, Gordon Moore, the Intel co-founder, posited Moore’s Law, which stipulated that the processing power that could be placed on a single microchip would double every 18 months to 24 months. It has held up quite well since then. Watching European, Arab and US leaders grappling with their respective crises, I am wondering if there is not a political corollary to Moore’s Law: The quality of political leadership declines with every 100 million new users of Facebook and Twitter.

The wiring of the world through social media and Web-enabled cellphones is changing the nature of conversations between leaders and the led everywhere. We are going from largely one-way conversations — top-down — to overwhelmingly two-way conversations — bottom-up and top-down. This has many upsides: more participation, more innovation and more transparency. However, can there be such a thing as too much participation — leaders listening to so many voices all the time and tracking the trends that they become prisoners of them?

This sentence jumped out from a Politico piece on Wednesday last week: “The Obama and Romney campaigns spend all day strafing each other on Twitter, all while decrying the campaign’s lack of serious ideas for a serious time. Yet at most junctures when they’ve had the opportunity to go big, they’ve chosen to go small.” Indeed, I heard a new word in London last week: “Popularism.” It is the uber ideology of our day. Read the polls, track the blogs, tally the Twitter feeds and Facebook postings and go precisely where the people are, not where you think they need to go. If everyone is “following,” who is leading?

More http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit.../27/2003536347

See also:

Iran accuses world powers of dragging feet in nuke talks
Wed, Jul 04, 2012 - Iran accused world powers yesterday of dragging their feet in negotiations over its nuclear activities, as both sides were about to hold a new, downgraded round of talks in Istanbul, Turkey.

Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast told a weekly briefing that, if the powers ignored Iran’s nuclear “rights” and failed to bargain on equal terms, the negotiations could lead to an “impasse.” “All that can reinforce the idea that there is a desire to drag out the negotiations or prevent their success,” he said. Iran and the P5+1 group comprising the five UN Security Council permanent members (Britain, China, France, Russia and the US) plus Germany were to hold an experts-level meeting in Istanbul to discuss efforts to curb Tehran’s atomic activities.

The talks were to take place between technical experts after three previous rounds earlier this year, at a more senior political level, failed to bridge the vast gap dividing the two sides. Iran is insisting it has a “right” to uranium enrichment under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and that that be recognized by the P5+1. It also wants Western sanctions punishing its economy to be eased.

The P5+1 instead is pushing for an immediate end to Iran enriching uranium to 20 percent purity — just a technical step short of the 90 percent needed to make nuclear bombs — and to ship out its existing 20 percent stock and close a fortified underground enrichment facility in Fordo.

Mehmanparast said the P5+1’s negotiating position and the Western sanctions suggested that maybe the world powers did not want to see the talks bear fruit. “Many people are starting to conclude that maybe there are specific goals in dragging out the talks and preventing their success. One option is that perhaps there is a link with the US [presidential] election” in November, he said. He said the “illegal and illegitimate” sanctions contradicted the West’s affirmation that it wants to resolve the standoff diplomatically.

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/worl.../04/2003536947