![]() |
|
|
|||
|
I don't deny the second amendment, but I think we'd all be a lot better off without guns. Yes even if a few bad guys still have them. Here's why:
Enough! Is what He said. Have we no trust in His might? Did we really think bearing arms was a God given right? Turn the other cheek for vengeance is God’s right. Only then can we celebrate a truly special Saturday Night. It may be lawful, and it may indeed be just, But we can live in confidence, when in God we truly trust. Only the weak and fearful, or those with thieving hearts of lust. The power to kill your brother – Is this such a must? No! For God gives us a spirit confident and strong Which proceeds not from a metal barrel short or long But from the God Eternal to whom we all belong. So let us not continue to idolize that which is wrong. If it can keep a Colt or Beretta out of a killers hands. Why not limit access to these deadly brands. Let us despise the gun all across our lands. Waiting? Tracking? Forsake them altogether as Jesus Christ commands! No one is an island, separate and insolated from the main So send not to know who was the victim, Let me explain: When a killer shoots our neighbor we all feel the pain Listen to all the gunshots - they toll for thee again. Hand guns are made for killing, they aren’t good for anything else And if you like your whiskey you might even shoot yourself. So why don’t we dump them all in the sea – off the continental shelf Before some fool comes and finds us, and shoots both of us and himself.* *Last Verse Modified from Ronnie VanZant’s and Ed King’s ‘Saturday Night Special “Its a saturday night special - Got a barrel that’s blue and cold Ain’t no good for nothin’ - But put a man six feet in a hole” |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is a distinction between defending your life from criminal attack and submitting to persecution for your faith. Christ wanted His disciples to be empowered to defend themselves but also to understand, that in His case, His death was fulfilling prophecy. Only a few hours later, Christ rebukes Peter who used his sword to cut off the ear of Malchus, a servant of the high priest in the company of a detachment of troops. Let us read what Christ said to Peter in Matthew 26:52-54:
While Christ told Peter to "put your sword in its place" He clearly did not say dispose of it forever. That would have contradicted what He had told the disciples only hours before. He again states that his persecution and death are above the mortal plane and Peter’s normal response when threatened (drawing his weapon) was unnecessary to defend Christ. The rebuke of taking the sword refers to Peter’s offensive, not defensive use of the weapon against a servant, not a soldier and his exposure to the wrath of the magistrate's sword of justice. Peter's sword was to protect his own mortal life from danger. His sword was not needed to protect the Creator of the universe and the King of kings. Even more instructive of the mindset is the description of this incident in the book of Luke:
Jesus said, "Permit even this." He had to tell the Apostles to restrain what was their normal impulse of defense, "striking with the sword." Years after Pentecost, Paul wrote in a letter to Timothy,
This passage applies to our subject because it would be absurd to buy a house, furnish it with food and facilities for one's family, and then refuse to protect himself, his family and the property as allowed in Exodus 22:2-3.
A related, and even broader concept is found in the parable of the Good Samaritan. It was the Good Samaritan who took care of the mugging victim after others walked by and ignored the victim's plight. They were not acting as neighbors to him. We all know the parable and its lesson. But, what if the Samaritan walked by earlier? Can anyone say it would be neighborly, that if he came upon the attack in progress, the “Samaritan” then meekly hid and waited for the assault to end and the mugger left, before he rendered assistance? The Bible speaks of no such right. It does speak of faltering before the wicked though. And it speaks of our responsibilities in the face of an attack -- as individuals made by God, as householders or as neighbors, protecting our own and our neighbor’s sacred life. Living your life abdicating the responsibility for personal protection because "God will protect you" is mocking God and challenging him. Your life is sacred, there is no right or duty to surrender it to the wicked. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|