Two men breaking into a woman's home with a knife reflecting intended harm to the woman is emperical evidence that is far more compelling than statistical analysis which always has a "margin of error" associated with it. There is no "margin of error" related to an actual forced entry with a knife. The threat is very real and is the best form of emperical evidence.
Originally Posted by Reiver
So please provide any argument as to why this woman would have been better off being unarmed so that she would be a victim of probable rape and murder. Argue against this "emperical evidence" related to an actual crime that was stopped with a firearm because the police were incapable of protecting the woman.
PoliticalForum.com functions as a public forum website open to all individuals of all political persuasions that is centered on the discussion of politics in general. All walks of life are welcome to join the discussions in the tradition of vigorous respectful debate.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. ~Evelyn Beatrice Hall