Not quite a million in Florida--last count was 879,000 or so. Now, if you count other groups like Private investigators, you do get a little more than a million.
http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/sta...es_By_Type.pdf
Not quite a million in Florida--last count was 879,000 or so. Now, if you count other groups like Private investigators, you do get a little more than a million.
http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/sta...es_By_Type.pdf
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
--C. S. Lewis, God in the Dock, p. 292.
There are many times more CC carriers than police yet they still misuse their weapons less often than do the police. Are you trying to say the police have more opportunities to misuse their weapon? That might be right but I have not read any studies that rely on this to explain why the police screw up with their weapons so often.
“The only difference between death and taxes is that death doesn't get worse every time Congress meets.” – Will Rogers
Without pointing to a cause, your point is irrelevant.
Police officers carry their weapons all day. Police officers are more likely to draw their weapons. They are exposed to the possession and use of their weapons more than CCW holders. How often do CCW holders carry? How often do CCW holders draw their weapons?
Your argument is completely irrelevant. You are comparing CCW holders to police officers, I do not care about police officers. I care about incompetent shooters carrying loaded weapons in public, your only rebuttal is how through mysterious means training means nothing.
A red herring.
Just because I find your religion silly does not mean I am an atheist.
Save us both the time and refrain from clicking Reply if you are going to address me as a such.
There is no love in Fear.
Ayuh,... I can't speak for All ccw holders, but this 1 carries All day, Everyday....
And,...
I dare say the majority of CCW holders, NEVER draw their gun....
I've been carrying since the early 80s, 'n only had to point my gun at 1 fellow, who fortunately understood the lesson I'd just taught him...
His attack on me ended, 'n I went on my way, 'n he was also able to walk away...
..... that only serves to strengthen my argument.
Just because I find your religion silly does not mean I am an atheist.
Save us both the time and refrain from clicking Reply if you are going to address me as a such.
There is no love in Fear.
True, which is why with all their "mandated" training they should be the most competent, but sadly they are not.
How often do CCW carriers shoot innocent by standards?
Again, so is yours.
.
Of course you don't, they (police) are trained under a government mandate and still prove to be incompetent with their firearm, it is easier for you to reject this reality and focus on a fairy tale of CCW carrier's being a threat to the populous.
Just because he can't shoot accurately doesn't mean he shouldn't be allowed to conceal carry. <3 my rights.
Just because I find your religion silly does not mean I am an atheist.
Save us both the time and refrain from clicking Reply if you are going to address me as a such.
There is no love in Fear.
I don't care about police officers. They carry their firearms more often, they draw their firearms more often, and they fire their weapons more often in instances that occur more frequently than what a CCW holder will experience. Your argument is irrelevant.
So either training is beneficial (my position), or maybe we can argue about how useless training is and how it is completely unnecessary for decent pistolmanship? Your position contradicts every class I have attended and every tactical pistol book I have reviewed.
Irrelevant.How often do CCW carriers shoot innocent by standards?
Just because I find your religion silly does not mean I am an atheist.
Save us both the time and refrain from clicking Reply if you are going to address me as a such.
There is no love in Fear.
I'm late to this party but I'll chime in.
I'm definitely a conservative and a CWP carrier. I happen to agree with the atheist OP.
Although I consider myself a pretty damm good marksman and was fortunate enough to have a very, very good instructor when I first applied, I agree that many classes are somewhat of a joke.
For instance, the gun show at the fairgrounds always offers courses and I sat nearby and watched once or twice. About the only thing taught was where you can't carry. Each student then went out to a semi trailer and fired two shots with a .22, got their fingerprints and went home to await their permit.
My good friend recently took a different course from a local individual ex-cop who teaches. Not only did he not get to focus on aiming or using his gun, the teacher taught him some really dumb things like "any delivery person is allowed to carry in to a government building", he also taught him the untrue "3 moves rule" when carrying in a vehicle. My friend fired his weapon twice and was carrying it two weeks later. (as an aside, this same friend accidentally shot his mattress while showing his pistol to his brother)
I'm all for citizens being able to arm themselves but I would feel better knowing they were responsible and knew how to handle their weapons.
I'm confident that I could clearly assess a threatening situation before firing my weapon and I'm confident I can hit my mark if I did have to fire. I'm not so confident about my friend or most of the people who took the gun show classes.
Recent lib quotes on PF:
"Gun makers do not put in design features to enable users to break the law." ~ Speeders R Murderers
"..more education, and greater access to free contraception, together with a shift in social attitudes would drive (abortion) numbers down. " ~ Jack Napier
Obama 2012 - Seeya!
Bookmarks