Thread: Obama Administration's War Against The Second Amendment...

Originally Posted by Wolverine

Nope. I'll report any more spam.

Like Anti-Zionist Bigotry spam ?

Originally Posted by onalandline

I am not aware of any firearm registration from that period.

Hell, some of them made their own (From Scratch)

It works well unfortunately and its a shame to see Americans so easily twisted away from the brilliance of individualism

When God created Eve, Adam lost 50% his individualism. Shame, really, he had to go and do that.

Originally Posted by Wolverine

Which is why the Founding Fathers registered firearms?

Please provide proof that they did.

Originally Posted by red states rule

Check it out. A big sign saying "I have many valuable, portable and easily pawnable items in my house! Please come in when I'm not home and steal my guns!".

You boys go right ahead and put those signs up. We liberals will thank you for making your own house the mark. Being intelligent, we prefer not to advertise about our guns. I mean, we don't have to make our house impregnable. We just have to make it less of a target than your house.

Originally Posted by mamooth

Check it out. A big sign saying "I have many valuable, portable and easily pawnable items in my house! Please come in when I'm not home and steal my guns!".

You boys go right ahead and put those signs up. We liberals will thank you for making your own house the mark. Being intelligent, we prefer not to advertise about our guns. I mean, we don't have to make our house impregnable. We just have to make it less of a target than your house.

Exactly my thoughts.

Originally Posted by Silverhair

Please provide proof that they did.

Gun Fight
[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Gunfight-Battle-over-Right-America/dp/0393077411"]Amazon.com: Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America (9780393077414): Adam Winkler: Books[/ame]

An excellent read.

Originally Posted by onalandline

All gun owners/Second Amendment supporters should have those signs.

Of course, we should all advertise valuables in our homes!

Makes total sense!

Originally Posted by onalandline

I am not aware of any firearm registration from that period.

[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Gunfight-Battle-over-Right-America/dp/0393077411/"]Amazon.com: Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America (9780393077414): Adam Winkler: Books[/ame]

Check it out if you interested in a point of view far removed from the ignorance of the Brady Campaign and the paranoid delusions of the NRA.

Originally Posted by onalandline

They both have anti-gun records

You already said that and I replied that your SAYING this does not automatically make it so.

Originally Posted by onalandline

and Sotomayor voted agaisnt over-turning the Chicago gun ban. Kagan would have if she were part of it.

The Opinion went far beyond a simple city ordinance, friend. The majority Opinion dealt with complicated legal issues that you clearly are not apprised of. The fact that she joined a dissenting Opinion does NOT mean that she is "anti-gun".
I can't even begin to address your silly assumption as to Kagan.

Originally Posted by onalandline

A scandal YOU refuse to know anything about.

I am fully aware of what I do not know. Do you?

Originally Posted by onalandline

Just the fact that the Obama Admin supports this is enough to see where he stands on guns.

The President supports addressing the illegal international small arms trafficking. What YOU have read into this is entirely your own slanted and agenda-driven ideology.

Originally Posted by onalandline

Not restrictive for you.

Hardly a restrictive regulation, friend. You could easily offset that regulation with his signing into law the lifting of restrictions on carrying guns in national parks. Even Steven.