Reiver I have posted government study's and I consider them as or more credible that what you fail to post. I am not saying that your studies are or are not false because I can not see them. You spout gibberish and produce nothing concrete and I suspect it is because your sources would be trumped by mine.
Now Bugger OFF Old Chap.
When we can see a better future for our nations children we can focus on the non issue; issues.
Don't fib now. You've posted government information and used that to splutter and splatter spurious relationship. You haven't referred to a single source that has undertaken the required hypothesis testing methodology. Indeed, in terms of the gun control debate, you haven't even introduced yourself with anything credible.
When we can see a better future for our nations children we can focus on the non issue; issues.
The title of this thread should read "Human Related Deaths". I'll be (*)(*)(*)(*)ed the last time I saw a gun jump up all by itself and kill someone.
How about Baseball Bat related deaths
Knife related deaths
Chemical related deaths
Wood chipper related deaths..........and lets not forget.........
Stupidity related deaths
Dude check out some of my posts. Gun related deaths are down where they have banned guns as are the homicide rate in general but the violent crime rates have almost doubled in some places that banned guns. It seemed an attack so I went on the defensive and the FBI lab shows US crime rates going down.
When we can see a better future for our nations children we can focus on the non issue; issues.
Data is available to all. Its useless on its own. It has to be used within an empirical methodology capable of testing a gun hypothesis. You should be asking for the references of the studies. Of course you're already been provided with examples and choosing to ignore them. Same ole, same ole
Bookmarks