Liberals, explain your gross ideological inconsistency
You want to level the playing field socioeconomically, but you scream in horror at the thought of leveling the playing field in the area of personal defense. The thought of some people having significanlty less money-making aptitude than others horrifies you, yet some people being a lot faster, more skilled, stronger, and/or younger than others and thus able to more easily defeat them in hand-to-hand conflict not only doesn't bother any of you, but many of you seem to think that it's pretty cool that some people get beaten to death. Many of you express the attitude that it's simply tough excrement if you get assaulted and die as a result, because afterall, you weren't worthy of life for not being as good of a fighter, and therefore you fight tooth-and-nail against the rememdy, legal private firearm ownership, for this problem. On the other hand, you throw hissy fits over socioeconomic equality that arises from differences in ability, and stomp your feet and demand remedies, such as socialist policies, to socioeconomic inequality. Explain yourselves.
"I'm inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa ... all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours –whereas all the testing says not really."
James Watson, Nobel Prize winner