Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Gun Control


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2009, 09:06 PM
.daniel .daniel is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,644
usa
.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute.daniel has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 10,649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teamosil View Post
For gun owners to pose a credible threat of revolution against the US military would mean they would need stealth bombers, nuclear missles, surface to air missle, a massive command and control structure complete with radar and all that... Unless you want to make it legal for people to buy all those things, the revolution angle doesn't really make any sense. And I'm going to guess that folks that seem to have complaints about trigger locks and whatnot wouldn't handle a nuclear arsenal so wisely...
Because the US Military, in all of its might, certainly hasn't had trouble clearing out the insurgency in Iraq or anything....or Afghanistan...or Vietnam...
__________________
"I believe that my next 100 days will be so successful, I will be able to complete them in 72 days. And on the 73rd day I will rest." -President Obama


"There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other." - John Adams

Do you want equality AND small government? Join the Democratic Freedom Caucus!

http://www.democraticfreedomcaucus.org/
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #222 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2009, 09:27 PM
Bowerbird's Avatar
Bowerbird Bowerbird is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 4,783
australia au queensland
Bowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 19,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBasicsAbout View Post
you are joking - right? (especially the part I darkened)
  1. Do you actually think that Military (Americans) would hit other Americans that hard>
  2. You think something like a nation wide riot would NOT put a massive stop to the Federal machine?

Yeah , I can see Obama approving a nuclear strike on American soil!
NOW we see what you think the government is capable of! .... Nice!!
Trouble is - this sort of thing escalates - next you have far too many civilian casualties
__________________
Greenhouse gases: Any gas that, by an accident of chemistry, happens to absorb radiation of a type that the Earth, by an accident of history, would like to lose. …

There is only one constant law: The perversity of the universe tends to a maximum
Reply With Quote
  #223 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009, 04:03 AM
TheBasicsAbout's Avatar
TheBasicsAbout TheBasicsAbout is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seeking Prosperity in NC
Posts: 1,296
usa us new york
TheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud of
Credits: 7,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowerbird View Post
Trouble is - this sort of thing escalates - next you have far too many civilian casualties
you mean like the casualties in urban neighborhoods which has as of yet been corrected?

of course - a civil war would escalate - that would be the point of a war.

What disturbs me are who on the other side would be fighting against me (a conservative)

Over 50% of all liberals fit in one of 2 groups
  1. anti gun people
  2. possessors of stolen guns (mainly urban youth).
__________________
Part of the first videoed speech by any President was by President Calvin Coolidge said:
I want the people of America to be able to work less for the government and more for themselves.
Can you tell he was a Republican!

For those who want something to care about:
Want To Do Good? Help This Organization Moyer Foundation's Camp Erin started by Phillies Pitcher
Reply With Quote
  #224 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 03:52 AM
Skinny.'s Avatar
Skinny. Skinny. is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A Yellow Submarine
Posts: 3,812
australia au new south wales
Skinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 7,615
Send a message via MSN to Skinny.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teamosil View Post
For gun owners to pose a credible threat of revolution against the US military would mean they would need stealth bombers, nuclear missles, surface to air missle, a massive command and control structure complete with radar and all that...
Though the main argument here is for them to be used against local governments (see:Battle of Athens, I already posted the story on page 20), or non government factions that pose a threat (if for whatever reason, the government can't stop them, which I wouldn't rule out), it is possible civil war would break out. In which case, it wouldn't be ''this half of the country vs. that half'' as we have seen in the past, it would likely be people from all over going against the current government. In which case, nuclear missles and the like wouldn't be necessary, as the government couldn't get away with blowing up entire cities on their own soil.
__________________
Baby's got a place in the sun, selling people shade
Reply With Quote
  #225 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 04:02 AM
Skinny.'s Avatar
Skinny. Skinny. is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A Yellow Submarine
Posts: 3,812
australia au new south wales
Skinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond reputeSkinny. has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 7,615
Send a message via MSN to Skinny.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowerbird View Post
I am not advocating I am asking how you will use your gun to defend yourself from the government or to preserve your rights - nobody seems able to answer that,
Armed action is only ever really necessary against a government, law enforcement agenc that is already using violence, by shooting people THEMSELVES if we peacfully demand they leave. If the majority of people want them out, yet they stay, they need to be removed by force. Yes, I know the people who the government will send out (soldiers, police) are relatively innocent, but that's just too bad. If we applied this argument to all war, all war would be considered unjust. Should we have used Ghandis tactics against Hitler, after willfully allowing him to invade Britain? Should we have used Ghandis tactics against the Japanese after willfully allowing them to invade the USA and Australia? We should, according to you, given it's not the Japanese and German soldiers' fault that their leaders are out of control.
__________________
Baby's got a place in the sun, selling people shade
Reply With Quote
  #226 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 05:09 AM
TheBasicsAbout's Avatar
TheBasicsAbout TheBasicsAbout is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seeking Prosperity in NC
Posts: 1,296
usa us new york
TheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud of
Credits: 7,392
Default THIS is why we must keep the Right To Bare Arms

Quote:
NRA to settle suit over Katrina gun seizures
Posted by Michael Kunzelman/Associated Press October 08, 2008 12:24PM
NEW ORLEANS (AP) _ City officials have agreed to return hundreds of firearms that police officers confiscated in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, part of a deal to resolve a lawsuit filed by gun lobbying groups.

The settlement agreement filed Tuesday in federal court calls for the National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation to drop their case if the city follows a plan for returning guns to owners who had them seized by police after the Aug. 29, 2005, hurricane.

Both sides also are asking U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier to sign off on the pact and issue a permanent injunction barring the city from seizing lawfully possessed firearms. Barbier didn't immediately rule on the agreement, which doesn't involve a monetary award.

Police department spokesman Bob Young said it has stored 552 guns that were confiscated after Katrina, through Dec. 31, 2005. Police have said they only took guns that were stolen or found in abandoned homes.
The video above was a gun in an abandoned home ... can you tell?
__________________
Part of the first videoed speech by any President was by President Calvin Coolidge said:
I want the people of America to be able to work less for the government and more for themselves.
Can you tell he was a Republican!

For those who want something to care about:
Want To Do Good? Help This Organization Moyer Foundation's Camp Erin started by Phillies Pitcher
Reply With Quote
  #227 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 05:29 AM
Bowerbird's Avatar
Bowerbird Bowerbird is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 4,783
australia au queensland
Bowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 19,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny. View Post
Armed action is only ever really necessary against a government, law enforcement agenc that is already using violence, by shooting people THEMSELVES if we peacfully demand they leave. If the majority of people want them out, yet they stay, they need to be removed by force. Yes, I know the people who the government will send out (soldiers, police) are relatively innocent, but that's just too bad. If we applied this argument to all war, all war would be considered unjust. Should we have used Ghandis tactics against Hitler, after willfully allowing him to invade Britain? Should we have used Ghandis tactics against the Japanese after willfully allowing them to invade the USA and Australia? We should, according to you, given it's not the Japanese and German soldiers' fault that their leaders are out of control.
No but Hitler was invading another country - Gandhi's tactics DID work, and worked very well against the British Empire, who were not exactly nice people at that time.

But there have been many, many other examples of peaceful revolution since Gandhi - Philippines comes to mind
__________________
Greenhouse gases: Any gas that, by an accident of chemistry, happens to absorb radiation of a type that the Earth, by an accident of history, would like to lose. …

There is only one constant law: The perversity of the universe tends to a maximum
Reply With Quote
  #228 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 05:34 AM
Bowerbird's Avatar
Bowerbird Bowerbird is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 4,783
australia au queensland
Bowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond reputeBowerbird has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 19,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBasicsAbout View Post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4
The video above was a gun in an abandoned home ... can you tell?
If I were you I would NOT use Katrina as a good example of gun use - you have NO idea how poorly you looked in the eyes of the rest of the world when we heard of rescuers being shot at.

It sickened many here.

We have had some pretty impressive disasters here ourselves and we would NEVER shoot at each other. IF you caught someone looting you would take him out the back and kick his arse so hard his bum would wrap around his head.

Disasters are a time to work together not to shoot at each other.
__________________
Greenhouse gases: Any gas that, by an accident of chemistry, happens to absorb radiation of a type that the Earth, by an accident of history, would like to lose. …

There is only one constant law: The perversity of the universe tends to a maximum
Reply With Quote
  #229 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 06:13 AM
TheBasicsAbout's Avatar
TheBasicsAbout TheBasicsAbout is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seeking Prosperity in NC
Posts: 1,296
usa us new york
TheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud ofTheBasicsAbout has much to be proud of
Credits: 7,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowerbird View Post
If I were you I would NOT use Katrina as a good example of gun use - you have NO idea how poorly you looked in the eyes of the rest of the world when we heard of rescuers being shot at.

It sickened many here.
... and if you saw the little old lady in that video who got body slammed by the cop - how do you compare that to those who she needed the gun to protect herself?

THINK ABOUT IT LIKE THIS:

Auto accidents have caused MANY horrendous deaths of children - why not BAN them?

It's not the tool - it is the moron using it the wrong way who is the problem.

You mentioned the rescuers being shot at? What if they were armed? you think those self centered thugs would have shot at them? They were predator's - they only attack what they think they can beat ... EASILY ... as a MOB!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowerbird View Post
We have had some pretty impressive disasters here ourselves and we would NEVER shoot at each other.
... but what the media fails to clarify about those morons is they are a major part of what OUR liberal government has created by giving them the power to think they are entitled to more than they can do for themselves.

If you ever spent time in New Orleans you would find several things to be true...
  1. it is called the "BIG EASY" for a reason.
  2. many of the poor people there (and else where throughout the world) tend to be more predatory.
  3. They think it is right to take from those who have what they won't get for themselves.
  4. They have lost the sense of dignity that comes from earning what you have - thanks to socialized government give away programs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowerbird View Post
IF you caught someone looting you would take him out the back and kick his arse so hard his bum would wrap around his head.
ABSOLUTELY!! ... but without a gun ... how close would you get to them to stop them? You can trust this ... I am an armed person ... and to me it is my duty as a citizen to do what it takes to aid in the defense of my neighbors and others around me. I also understand that the police at times are too busy to get there fast enough to prevent an issue - which makes me the first line of prevention and defense until they can get there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowerbird View Post
Disasters are a time to work together not to shoot at each other.
Personally - I have traveled nearly 1,500 miles (about 2,500k) to help in a disaster (when there were mud slides in Bountiful, Utah and I was in Buffalo, N.Y.) - someone even wrote a news story about my traveling that far to help (a waist of print!)
__________________
Part of the first videoed speech by any President was by President Calvin Coolidge said:
I want the people of America to be able to work less for the government and more for themselves.
Can you tell he was a Republican!

For those who want something to care about:
Want To Do Good? Help This Organization Moyer Foundation's Camp Erin started by Phillies Pitcher
Reply With Quote
  #230 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2009, 10:11 AM
pneutin pneutin is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 239
usa us california
pneutin is a splendid one to beholdpneutin is a splendid one to beholdpneutin is a splendid one to beholdpneutin is a splendid one to beholdpneutin is a splendid one to beholdpneutin is a splendid one to beholdpneutin is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 1,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowerbird View Post
No but Hitler was invading another country - Gandhi's tactics DID work, and worked very well against the British Empire, who were not exactly nice people at that time.

But there have been many, many other examples of peaceful revolution since Gandhi - Philippines comes to mind
Here's what Gandhi had to say about the British:

Quote:
Gandhi wrote in Chapter XXVII, "The Recruiting Campaign," in his autobiography, My Experiments with Truth:

'Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.'
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do Dogs Look Like Their Owners? Jiyuu-Freedom Off-Topic Chat 3 04-07-2009 02:08 PM
And this is an attempt to reassure gun owners? Texas gun owners? ArmedBlog Political Blogs 0 10-29-2008 11:40 AM
Pets that look like their owners B L Zeebub Off-Topic Chat 3 04-29-2008 09:27 PM
New Hope for Gun Owners? DiscerningBlog Political Blogs 0 03-18-2008 05:20 PM
A huge victory for gun owners BroncoBilly Gun Control 81 04-20-2007 07:53 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden