![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Now, can you tell me what makes this neutered version of a military gun more dangerous than another gun? Is it the caliber? The military heritage? What would you consider a "safe" gun? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
How do you define "military assault rifle"? An assault rifle that is currently in use by American military, or any military? Or any assault rifle ever used by any military? How do you define "semi-automatic version of"? By what specification--cosmetic similarities, functional operation, manufacturer, etc? How many of these characteristics must a semi-automatic rifle share with a "military assault rifle" to be deemed a "semi-automatic version of"? Last edited by pneutin; 11-07-2009 at 02:44 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/forms/pdf/awguide.pdf Page 71 Generic Characteristics Defining Assault Weapons: 12276.1 (a) Notwithstanding Penal Code section 12276, “assault weapon” shall also mean the following: Rifles (1) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following: (A) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon. (B) A thumbhole stock. (C) A folding or telescoping stock. (D) A grenade launcher or flare launcher. (E) A flash suppressor. (F) A forward pistol grip. (2) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. (3) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches. Note: Bayonets and bayonet lugs are not assault weapon characteristics under California law. And notice the last sentence. Until fairly recently, a bayonet lug would identify a rifle as an "Assault Rifle". And the phrase "centerfire" is also new, the original law did not have this qualifier. And yes, I got caught under this law. I had a Ruger 10-22. This is a rimfire .22 caliber rifle, and I used it for target practice. I did a few conversions, including mounting it in an M-16 style stock (to more closely simulate my professional weapon), and added a flash supressor (so when I fired in the prone position, I did not kick up dirt into my face). But the thing is, every item listed on the abocve list is cosmetic. Not a single "modification" makes a rifle more deadly, more accurate, or able to fire faster. Some are already patently illegal under Federal laws (grenade launchers!). And others make no sense, like flash supressors and thumbhole stocks. The attempt of these laws is to target the appearance of a weapon. Under the law, a WWII era M-1 is an "Assault Rifle", because it has a flash supressor. And your case earlier of Carail Weeks is a red herring. The man was trying to murder 2 drug dealers when he shot the girl. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's so the elites can implement communism.
__________________
From each according to his ability, to each according to his lack thereof. 109:8! |
|
||||
|
You mean assault weapon thing.
__________________
"Property is the fruit of labor...property is desirable...is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built." |
|
||||
|
You are preaching to the choir here brother.
__________________
"Property is the fruit of labor...property is desirable...is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built." |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do Dogs Look Like Their Owners? | Jiyuu-Freedom | Off-Topic Chat | 3 | 04-07-2009 02:08 PM |
| And this is an attempt to reassure gun owners? Texas gun owners? | ArmedBlog | Political Blogs | 0 | 10-29-2008 11:40 AM |
| Pets that look like their owners | B L Zeebub | Off-Topic Chat | 3 | 04-29-2008 09:27 PM |
| New Hope for Gun Owners? | DiscerningBlog | Political Blogs | 0 | 03-18-2008 05:20 PM |
| A huge victory for gun owners | BroncoBilly | Gun Control | 81 | 04-20-2007 07:53 PM |
| Sponsored Links |
|