Yes it does. You asked "does it?" and I showed you evidence that it does.
Any so-called "snake oil" therapy. Of all of them, why does Homeopathy seem to irk the skeptics the most?what are you including?
chinese herbal remedies?
ayurvedic?
flower threrapy?
*sigh* I have. No need to make they more complicated than it is.If you are talking about what scpetics believe, you need to be a bit more exact in what you are talking about.
I'm not convinced. Your evidence is circumstantial. It's not direct evidence that skeptics are more or less irked by homeopathy. How do you quantify levels of irk? Are the number of articles on blogs the only measure of irk?Yes it does. You asked "does it?" and I showed you evidence that it does.
Okay then. Skeptic + Homeopathy returns:
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&cp=17&g...w=1138&bih=503
865,000 results.
Skeptic + acupuncture returns
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&cp=11&g...w=1138&bih=503
811,000 results.
Skeptic + Naturopathic returns
http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-a...w=1138&bih=503
1,470,000 results
My equally valid study shows that skeptics are almost twice as irked by naturopathy as they are homeopathy, and almost equally irked by acupuncture.
Your question still begs the question, "are skeptics more irked by homeopathy?"
A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep
I don't think Googling for the number of results is a great indicator, but isn't comparing Homeopathy with Naturopathy like comparing apples and oranges? Homeopathy is a type of medicine where Naturopathy is like a natural MD who prescribes remedies that include things like Homeopathics.
Then your answer should be skeptics aren't more irked by Homeopathy compared to any other "snake oil" remedy.Your question still begs the question, "are skeptics more irked by homeopathy?"
Not sure why this is so difficult for the Homeopathy haters.
Bookmarks