Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Other Political Issues > Health Care


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2009, 10:05 PM
HB Surfer's Avatar
HB Surfer HB Surfer is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,611
usa us california
HB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond reputeHB Surfer has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 12,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shpraralain View Post
And purposely so, Senax. Consider the following debate, please.


“I do believe the American people are rightfully entitled to [know] what exactly we are doing, what we are legislating,” Snowe said. “Words matter, and so do the numbers. ... Time is our ally, not our enemy. People are rightfully concerned in this country [whether] we will get this right.”

Democrats pushed back, saying it was simply a delaying tactic, since Democratic congressional leaders are trying to adhere to a tight timetable to get a reform bill passed by November.

“I would like to remind our colleagues the effect of this amendment will be this: After we complete action, we will have to wait another two to three weeks before we can vote on it,” Baucus said, citing testimony Tuesday from CBO Director Doug Elmendorf that it would take that long to provide an analysis of the bill.

“We have never, ever, ever, ever done that in this committee,” Baucus said.

The bill isn’t even the version that will go to the Senate floor, noted Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), because it will be merged with legislation approved by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

“Let’s be honest about it,” said Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.). “Most people don’t read the legislative language.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz0VYzkbKao

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27506.html
Incredibly good post. The Democrats seem to want a bill so convoluted and cumbersome that knowing what it will do once passed seems impossible. This is not the type of legislation they promised when they requested and received power from the American people last November.
__________________
"...more bureaucratic government "jobs" that are nothing but a drain on an already sick economy." - Pollycy

"When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both." - James Dale Davidson
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 12:50 AM
Professor Peabody's Avatar
Professor Peabody Professor Peabody is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Age: 51
Posts: 10,102
usa us california
Professor Peabody has disabled reputation
Credits: 49,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HB Surfer View Post
Incredibly good post. The Democrats seem to want a bill so convoluted and cumbersome that knowing what it will do once passed seems impossible. This is not the type of legislation they promised when they requested and received power from the American people last November.
That's why they will a gigantic chunk of that Power 1 year and again 4 years from now.
__________________

Pushing back the frontiers of ignorance.
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 03:26 AM
shpraralain's Avatar
shpraralain shpraralain is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: God's greatest Country
Posts: 4,063
usa
shpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 17,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HB Surfer View Post
Incredibly good post. The Democrats seem to want a bill so convoluted and cumbersome that knowing what it will do once passed seems impossible. This is not the type of legislation they promised when they requested and received power from the American people last November.
And it is certainly not the transparency they promised either.
__________________
Don’t waste your breath on fools, for they will despise the wisest advice.
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 03:36 AM
jackdog's Avatar
jackdog jackdog is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,706
jackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond reputejackdog has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 16,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HB Surfer View Post
Incredibly good post. The Democrats seem to want a bill so convoluted and cumbersome that knowing what it will do once passed seems impossible. This is not the type of legislation they promised when they requested and received power from the American people last November.
Not meaning to derail but not sure if this is a current event yet so I decided against making a new topic but i am curious to see the plan the GOP is planning on introducing this week

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125711811707721639.html

Quote:
It would, among other things, propose new limits on medical malpractice lawsuits and make it easier for individuals and small businesses to pool resources to purchase insurance.

Mr. Boehner said the Republican bill would also propose grants for states that use "innovative" solutions to expand coverage. He pointed to states that have created special "high-risk pools" to provide insurance to individuals with pre-existing conditions.

He said the bill wouldn't raise taxes, nor mandate that individuals and businesses purchase insurance, as the Democratic legislation does.
__________________
Global warming alarmists are watermelons - green on the outside, red (socialist) on the inside

global warming , is there anything it cannot do ? http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm

peer reviewed studies and graphs of the Medieval Warming periods can be found at http://www.co2science.org/

Last edited by jackdog; 11-02-2009 at 03:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 04:52 AM
shpraralain's Avatar
shpraralain shpraralain is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: God's greatest Country
Posts: 4,063
usa
shpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 17,306
Default BHO to tax pacemakers and heart valves....?

We will see how our leftist friends will like it when the time comes for them to have one of those implants.......

The more fiscal details of the health care bills emerge, the more appalling they seem. The Senate Finance Committee bill includes a broad provision taxing all manner of medical devices. This tax includes such frivolous luxuries as pacemakers, stents, artificial heart valves, defibrillators, automated wheelchairs, mechanized artificial limbs, replacement hips and knees, surgical gurneys, laparoscopic equipment, and the like.

President Obama is planning to reduce the cost of medical care by taxing it!

The most recent Gallup Poll reflected that 49% of respondents said they believed that the Obamacare plan will increase their health care costs. Only about 20% said it would lower them. It is taxes like these that substantiate this kind of concern.

The origins of this new medical device tax are troubling as well.

The medical device industry had its day at the White House as did the insurance industry, the drug makers, the nurses, and the doctors. In turn, each group heard the White House request that they come up with voluntary cuts in their health care costs and support Obama’s proposed changes in return for assurances that Congress would not impose deeper cuts (or, in the case of the doctors, that it would actually rescind cuts already scheduled under current statutes).

But, unlike all these other groups, the medical device industry refused the deal. This posture enraged the tyrants in the White House who vowed to punish the industry with cuts imposed by Congress. The result was a decision by the revenue-hungry Senate Finance Committee to extract billions in funds from the industry.

The legislation does not work like a sales or excise tax. Rather it follows the model of the punitive tobacco settlement imposed on cigarette companies in the 90s. It assesses an industry-wide payment which firms must make in proportion to their market share. It bars the them from passing along the cost of the assessment by charging more for certain basic products, but allows them to raise the price of others to raise the funds for the fee.

So, the result will be that virtually every piece of advanced surgical equipment will be subject to a price increase to meet the levy from Washington. No matter that these devices often make the difference between life and death and that, in effect, taxing them raises the cost of vital treatments. The vengeful White House will have its pound of flesh from the medical device industry for daring to be independent and to refuse to knuckle down to Administration pressure!

This tax, imposed in a spirit of haughty arrogance, falls on totally inappropriate objects. Valves, prosthetic limbs, pacemakers, hearing aids, and such are essential therapies that make life longer, better, and less painful. To tax them makes no sense. Except in the world of sharp elbows and interest group politics that grips this take-no-prisoners and show-no-mercy White House.
SOURCE
__________________
Don’t waste your breath on fools, for they will despise the wisest advice.
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 09:58 AM
Never Left's Avatar
Never Left Never Left is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 52
Posts: 5,840
usa us oregon
Never Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 24,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imrahil1 View Post
The problem occurs when you lie about what's in the bill. There are legitimate reasons to oppose the bill or change it, but when you make up stuff, use easily disprovable scare tactics, post near-constant hyperbole, & depend upon slippery slope arguments, you turn more people against you than against the bill.
The problem is that the language used to write this kind of thing upon first reading sounds ambiguous and benigne. Look at what it says boldened in red:

(c) LIMITATIONON INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE
COVERAGE.—
(1) INGENERAL.—Individual health insurance
coverage that is not grandfathered health insurance
coverage under subsection (a) may only be offered
on or after the first day of Y1 as an Exchange-par-
ticipating health benefits plan.


This seems to say that unless it is grandfathered in it will not be available, Ask yourself, who will decide if it is or is not to be grandfathered?, and further in connection to other provisions of the bill or provisions of other bills, how will it be taxed, because this bill seems to suggest that unless you have the government option, your health care benefits will be taxed as income.

So you may sling accusations about if you wish, thats fine, but I am thinking about what I read, combined with the sure knowledge that these leftists do not have my best interest at heart, I will error on the side of extreme caution. While pretending to say other wise, Chairman Obama and his merry band of leftists want to do you in the ass, and you will not know until it is too late.
__________________
The post turtle.

http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/e...postturtle.jpg

Global warming "real science"

http://www.oism.org/pproject/GWReview_OISM150.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:07 AM
Never Left's Avatar
Never Left Never Left is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 52
Posts: 5,840
usa us oregon
Never Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond reputeNever Left has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 24,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taxpayer View Post
Considering how badly I feel my trust has been abused by my previous and current health care carriers... no. In fact, as much as I dislike government oversight, I think the current health care situation is such a mess I welcome a not-for-profit third party taking a look at the situation and requiring insurers to meet some basic standards. Some checks and balances have to be added to the system, supply and demand can't cut it when the demand is for life itself.



Respectfully, as I read this string it seems the first two points of this post have been shown to be misleading or false. After that, I'd assume the remainder of the post is on just as shaky ground.
That is precisly the apathy and uncommited thinking that the leftist losers are counting on to get this thging through. The language is the intent, and that it is so large and intimidateing and filled with legalese and it references other already existing legislation that creates a confusing and muddied conversation because we do not know for sure what this monstrosity really means. So to say that the first two points are ambiguous and unclear is just the response that these leftists want you to have, while all the while the ruination of you life because you are forced to abandon all choices to a government breaucracy and are at the mercy of these assclowns.
__________________
The post turtle.

http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/e...postturtle.jpg

Global warming "real science"

http://www.oism.org/pproject/GWReview_OISM150.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:08 AM
drpepper drpepper is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,320
drpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 4,387
Default so

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenaxFlatulus View Post
[color=Blue]I've heard and read all the hyperbole about what is supposed to be in the bill, and what some say isn't in the bill. I thought I'd look it up for everyone and post the link here for future reference.
So, all the nuts who claimed to have read the bill 2 months ago at the staged "town hall" meetings were liars?

You even have "Fake tan" Boehner admitting this is the first bill yesterday.

__________________
Cash for clunkers worked: It took all the McCain/Palin bumper stickers off the highway.
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:10 AM
shpraralain's Avatar
shpraralain shpraralain is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: God's greatest Country
Posts: 4,063
usa
shpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond reputeshpraralain has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 17,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drpepper View Post
So, all the nuts who claimed to have read the bill 2 months ago at the staged "town hall" meetings were liars?

You even have "Fake tan" Boehner admitting this is the first bill yesterday.

No substance but personal attacks. Good one.
__________________
Don’t waste your breath on fools, for they will despise the wisest advice.
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:18 AM
drpepper drpepper is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,320
drpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond reputedrpepper has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 4,387
Default answer the question

Quote:
Originally Posted by shpraralain View Post
No substance but personal attacks. Good one.
If this IS the Bill, then were the tea baggers lying when they said hey read it 2 months ago?
__________________
Cash for clunkers worked: It took all the McCain/Palin bumper stickers off the highway.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Historic: House unveils their health care bill SeminalBlog Political Blogs 0 10-29-2009 10:40 AM
House Health Care Bill Unveiled LeonCoDem Health Care 0 10-29-2009 07:10 AM
Dems Go After Each Other Over Health care Reform bill JP5 Health Care 0 10-17-2009 04:09 PM
Rename health care bill for Kennedy OverDrive Health Care 72 08-30-2009 07:54 AM
The reason why the Health Care Bill will not be passed... armor99 Political Opinions & Beliefs 2 07-26-2009 12:44 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden