Buddhism is mysticism, and nutty. It is based on neolitic superstition. It has zero to little morality to it.

But you think everything is equal because your a moral equivalentist.

That "moral equivalent" phrase of yours really is a crutch.
Perhaps you should just quit with the whole charade of calling others "lazy thinkers" and just admit that you have a cast-in-stone view on things that overrides anything that comes from the outside world and a complete lack of any interest of seeing things from anyone else's point of view.
Believe me. I won't think any different of you.
It strikes me as ironic. A guy who absolutely hates empathy calling other people "lazy thinkers" AND thinks he has a monopoly on morality.

__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside

All morality is relative to Democrats, unless it supercedes their political power.

You're dodging again, you and your fascination wit Democrats and "moral relativism".
Do you even have a definition for this "equivalency" crap or does it just come up when you need it. It appears to me that your devotion to the term is just a form of "moral relativism".

__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside

You think you can critisize me, but I cannot critisize you. How autocratic. That in a nutshell is how Democrats think.

I'm not dodging anything. You can't say, "You are a moral equivalentist because you called me a moral equivalentist." Thats like, "I know you are but what am I."

No. That is your assertion. Apparently you believe you can criticize me but I cannot criticize your critique.
Another dodge.

__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside

What am I dodging?

I don't know much about Bhuddism, although I studied Eastern Art for a year once, in the East, because I was incredibly borred at the time. Their art reflects their religion, and their religion is nutty and smacks of neolitic beliefs, neolithic beliefs are pure mysticism with little or not morality tale to it. Pure superstition.

I'm not even sure anymore

I think I an actual definition of "moral equivalency".
Or perhaps some specifics on your baseless attack on Buddhism.

But more of your hate-filled empty comments would be a good substitute.

__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside

I hate moral equivalency.

Whats your definition of moral equivalency? Do you even have any criteria that meets a moral equivalency stance (other then bashing me personally)?