Thread: Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”

Originally Posted by The XL

They have more credibility than Fox, MSNBC, and CNN at this point, to be honest.

Well for sure, Infowars is run by normal people who know we are in a battle for our republic and our lives.
MSM, is run by special interests corps, like MSNBC owned by GE who makes money on wars, and all the smiling people who read to us off teleprompters aren't worried about our republic and lives, they are just worried about their jobs, they are just doing their jobs...just like TSA.

Originally Posted by Belus

There is absolutely nothing valid about infowars.com as a source. This thread should be moved.

No it should not.

I am sick of people like you demanding that threads be moved here, simply because you do not like the link or the narrative.

Get this...it is not your forum to make such demands, so rather than stamp your feet, why not address the content?

Would you prefer it it came from Fox?

Originally Posted by Margot

Well I cerainly agree that nationalism is dangerous.. Its always aggressive and the complete opposite of Patriotism.

Depends what you mean by 'nationalism', Margot.

In 2014, Scots will get to vote on whether or not they wish to leave the union.

We have Scottish Nationalists, indeed, Scottish Nationalists run our Parliment.

But all they want is for Scotland to self determine fully, and to promote Scottish interests in Scotland.

It is nationalism. But it has never and won't be violent, dangerous, or para militaristic.

Why is that?

Jack

I don't see any purpose for the elites of countries around the world to meet behind closed doors - unless the purpose is nefarious. If the purpose was to promote good will and prosperity, hold the (*)(*)(*)(*) meetings in front of the cameras.

Originally Posted by Jack Napier

Depends what you mean by 'nationalism', Margot.

In 2014, Scots will get to vote on whether or not they wish to leave the union.

We have Scottish Nationalists, indeed, Scottish Nationalists run our Parliment.

But all they want is for Scotland to self determine fully, and to promote Scottish interests in Scotland.

It is nationalism. But it has never and won't be violent, dangerous, or para militaristic.

Why is that?

Jack

So you are a Scot, I'm part MacKenzie

This whole thread is continuing to fill up with conspiracy theories. Time to report it and get it moved. Infowars.com is a laughable source. Period.

Originally Posted by The XL

They have more credibility than Fox, MSNBC, and CNN at this point, to be honest.

I think you are going to see a real rise in independent media again, and that is a good thing.

In 1980, over 50 companies covered and ran the US media. All indp of one another, and any other.

Now there are six.

And there narrative is much the same.

This has been on purpose, not all $ related, and entirely damaging.

People are so fed up, that they are turning to their own research and other media.

Good for them.

That is what they should do.

For too long we have been too lazy to do our own reading.

Anything that stimulates people to do that is good.

For too long people have contaminated their brain with a monologue from an owned media that has a bad agenda.

Anything that removes them from that is a good thing, and the media hate it when people do not pay attention to their version.

Viewing figures for much of MSM are down 30% in some cases.

The media have been put on trial.

Charged with lying all the time.

And dumbing people down.

The verdict is guilty - no doubt.

The sentence should be financial ruination.


Jack

Originally Posted by Belus

This whole thread is continuing to fill up with conspiracy theories. Time to report it and get it moved. Infowars.com is a laughable source. Period.

Why not stop moaning and acting like a control freak, and address the OP and the information?

How about THAT?

Originally Posted by Robodoon

So you are a Scot, I'm part MacKenzie

Hopefully the important part!

That looks about as genuine as the Bammer's Hawaiian birth certificate.