Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”

  1. Thumbs up Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”



    Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”
    Infowars exclusively obtains Senator’s notes, minutes, agenda from 1966 confab

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Infowars.com
    Wednesday, June 6, 2012

    Editor’s Note: We have obtained hundreds of documents from the 1966 meeting. This is a Wikileaks-sized data dump and we will be writing several more articles over the next few days to cover the myriad of different issues at hand.

    Leaked documents from the 1966 Bilderberg Group conference exclusively obtained by Infowars betray how even as far back as five decades ago U.S. Senators were being indoctrinated with the belief that “nationalism is dangerous” by Bilderberg elitists, in addition to top union heads scheming behind their members’ backs with titans of capitalism and industry.



    Previously leaked documents from meetings have illustrated how the Bilderberg Group, contrary to the media-generated myth that the confab represents a harmless talking shop, sets the consensus for policy decisions sometimes decades in advance.

    A clear example is the 1955 Bilderberg meeting held in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, West Germany. Documents read by the BBC and later released by Wikileaks divulge how Bilderberg members were discussing the creation of the euro single currency nearly 40 years before it was officially introduced in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

    Continued


    Comment: Good Find Infowars, this is going to be interesting. Spilling all the evil beans of the elites plans against us in 1966, and they are still doing it!
    Last edited by Robodoon; Jun 06 2012 at 12:50 PM.

  2. Likes Anders Hoveland liked this post

  3. #2

    Default

    Well I cerainly agree that nationalism is dangerous.. Its always aggressive and the complete opposite of Patriotism.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robodoon View Post


    Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”
    Infowars exclusively obtains Senator’s notes, minutes, agenda from 1966 confab

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Infowars.com
    Wednesday, June 6, 2012

    Editor’s Note: We have obtained hundreds of documents from the 1966 meeting. This is a Wikileaks-sized data dump and we will be writing several more articles over the next few days to cover the myriad of different issues at hand.

    Leaked documents from the 1966 Bilderberg Group conference exclusively obtained by Infowars betray how even as far back as five decades ago U.S. Senators were being indoctrinated with the belief that “nationalism is dangerous” by Bilderberg elitists, in addition to top union heads scheming behind their members’ backs with titans of capitalism and industry.



    Previously leaked documents from meetings have illustrated how the Bilderberg Group, contrary to the media-generated myth that the confab represents a harmless talking shop, sets the consensus for policy decisions sometimes decades in advance.

    A clear example is the 1955 Bilderberg meeting held in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, West Germany. Documents read by the BBC and later released by Wikileaks divulge how Bilderberg members were discussing the creation of the euro single currency nearly 40 years before it was officially introduced in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

    Continued


    Comment: Good Find Infowars, this is going to be interesting. Spilling all the evil beans of the elites plans against us in 1966, and they are still doing it!

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Margot View Post
    Well I cerainly agree that nationalism is dangerous.. Its always aggressive and the complete opposite of Patriotism.
    But they want and end of the USA, and a world government run by them and their buddies. And most people dead.

    Do you agree with that?

  5. #4
    usa
    Location: America
    Posts: 662

    Default

    Any thread that has infowars.com as a source should be in the conspiracy section. For all we know Alex Jones had those made up.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Belus View Post
    Any thread that has infowars.com as a source should be in the conspiracy section. For all we know Alex Jones had those made up.
    You should be more worried about Special interest Corporate News...Thats where the problem is, like Foxnews owner said "we tell you the news we want you to know"

    "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
    David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
    Bilderberg

  7. #6
    usa
    Location: America
    Posts: 662

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robodoon View Post
    You should be more worried about Special interest Corporate News...Thats where the problem is, like Foxnews owner said "we tell you the news we want you to know"



    David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
    Bilderberg
    There is absolutely nothing valid about infowars.com as a source. This thread should be moved.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Belus View Post
    There is absolutely nothing valid about infowars.com as a source. This thread should be moved.
    Yes there is, they aren't special interest corporate MSM news. Don't you understand how the MSM is used against the people and not for us? Infowars does a great job at exposing what the establishment hides from the people they are screwing, which would be "we the people"

  9. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Belus View Post
    Any thread that has infowars.com as a source should be in the conspiracy section. For all we know Alex Jones had those made up.
    No offense, but that's ridiculous. Infowars is like Wikipedia.

    Would you believe it if one of the big companies reported it?

  10. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Belus View Post
    There is absolutely nothing valid about infowars.com as a source. This thread should be moved.
    Way to ignore his post.

  11. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Belus View Post
    Any thread that has infowars.com as a source should be in the conspiracy section. For all we know Alex Jones had those made up.
    They have more credibility than Fox, MSNBC, and CNN at this point, to be honest.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 31 2012, 08:49 AM
  2. Vatileaks Pedofile Pope in Rome slams leaked documents
    By Abu Sina in forum Latest US & World News
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: May 26 2012, 11:42 PM
  3. Russia: Kremlin's Dangerous Flirtation with Fascism & Nationalism:
    By janpor in forum Russia & Eastern Europe
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Dec 07 2011, 12:58 PM
  4. An example of the dangers of Interventionism, Nation Building, and Regime Changing
    By leftlegmoderate in forum Political Opinions & Beliefs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Nov 16 2011, 08:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks