![]() |
|
|
|||
|
there is one reason in particular (other than the pre-mature strike on the soviet union)
Malta! Erwin Rommel would have won North Africa if supplies would have been able to get to him. Hitler would not attack the small island held by the british, thus cutting off the supply lines to the Afrika Korps. and causing the blitzkrieg to fail. If Rommel would have won in Africa he would have been able to move through the Middle East and flank Russia. The sad part is, is if the Nazis would have attacked Moscow instead of Stalingrad and Leningrad, the Germans would have won anyway. It is my opinion, that if Hitler would have attacked Moscow he would have won on TWO fronts anyway. |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
1. Hitler insisted on making all strategy decisions himself, but he was an inept tactician. 2. The Allies succeeded in cutting Germany off from most sources of raw materials and destroying most of their war-related productions facilities. while the US was able to produce massive quantities of weapons and equipment.
__________________
I feel sorry for people who can only see black and white in a full color world. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| germany, lost, malta, soviet, wwii |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What WWII would have been.. | DuH2 | Off-Topic Chat | 1 | 10-02-2007 11:00 AM |
| The PISSS countries of WWII | Jake | History & Past Politicians | 40 | 04-08-2007 04:47 PM |
| Best American President Since WWII? | Force-of-the-Truth | History & Past Politicians | 52 | 01-14-2007 11:44 AM |
| Good WWII article | Printer2 | History & Past Politicians | 17 | 05-25-2005 02:07 PM |
| Perspectives on WWII | trot | History & Past Politicians | 27 | 07-19-2004 09:06 AM |
| Sponsored Links |
|