Quote:
Originally Posted by hankdane";p="
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahTex";p="
"Roosevelt " didn't "create" a Recession.
|
He didn't create the original recession. His policies almost certainly resulted in the 1937 recession.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahTex";p="
And your comparison of the Great Depression with those previous ones is simplistic. The Great Depression was World Wide. The causes and effects were many and varied, and they were NOT restricted to only the United States.
|
Yes, the Great Depression was worldwide, helped in part by the misguided Smoot-Hayley bill. Nevertheless, there is every reason to believe the US would have fared much better under sounder policies. Already by then, the American economy was huge and resilient, both by international and historical standards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahTex";p="
Roosevelt's policies did not END the Depression. But they did accomplish 2 HUGE objectives. He (his charisma and Father Figure Image) created HOPE! His programs managed to, 1) Keep people from starving. 2) Bequeath our society with some magnificent, and Unmatched in this modern day, Architectural beauty! Look at ANY public works building built during the Depression and you will see intricate and amazing hand carvings in the building's decor. Those fantastic Gargoyles looking down over city streets from Post Offices and Federal Buildings. Roosevelt's Employment Programs produced amazing Environmental results in national forests through the CCC.
|
It's unclear how amazing handcarvings and fantastic Gargoyles aided the economic situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahTex";p="
The federal works programs were, of course, not perfect. And they DID NOT end the Depression. WWII did that. But FDR's programs gave a whole generation a reason to look to the future with Hope.
|
I'm sure FDR himself inspired hope.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahTex";p="
I voted for FDR because he was a psuedo Father to the whole generation, and then followed that with leading us through MOST of World War II. I can't imagine a worse pair of decades for a President than the 30's & 40's.
And he did it from a wheelchair, suffering the effects of POLIO!!!
|
Impressive, perhaps, but still unrelated to his economics performance.
FDR was a political genious. He managed to get reelected until his death, while making life in America manifestly worse. He is leading in this very poll. He obviously had some outstanding qualities. Among those, sadly missing was the ability to fix whatever was wrong with the economy.
|
While I voted for Lincoln, for obvious reasons, I have to defend FDR here, as best I can.
First of all, my logic is, you cannot create a recession when there already is one. By definition, and in this particular context, a recession is 'An extended decline in general business activity, typically three consecutive quarters of falling real gross national product' So for there to be another recession, one would have to assume the original has stopped. Anyways, just my logic.
Also, it wasn't just a recession. It was the greatest economic downfall in US history. Yes, already by then, the US had a huge and resilient economy. But that was threatened by the fact that there were so many poor, they erected Hoovervilles to house the dispossessed and destitute.
And, IMO, you missed the point that UtahTex was trying to make. FDR's policies didn't end the depression. FDR came into the Presidency, and sure, he didn't fix anything right away. But what he did do was say 'hey, we're going to find a cure', and that inspired the nation to work together to get through the hard times. He inspired America, directly, himself, to fight and win WWII. The US was strategically trying to help the war without taking direct damage, but Pearl Harbor changed that. FDR may not have dealt with the economy that well, but he provided hope, and that's what America needed most during WWII, and WWII ended the depression. FDR just provided hope and inspiration for the citizens of this great nation, so that Uncle Sam could roll up his sleeves and kick some Axis butt.
And on to your last paragraph. He made life in America manifestly worse? There's no one in the history of humanity that could have made life better. Not during WWII. Over 400,000 Americans died to preserve freedom for the world. (this next part is decidedly sarcastic, do not get overly offended by it) Or are you suggesting that life would have been better under the Master Plan economic policy?