You and Alexa should jump off your high horse for just a second and consider this rationally. The quote is there for you to see and put in the contexts by which I have explained I stand by it. What you have done - both of you - is read that statement and interpreted it as “These acts are intrinsic to Islam.” or “These acts are all that defines Islam.” or “Islam is inherently violent and oppressive.” And then you have addressed me accordingly from what I can tell. Alexa especially has launched straight into lecture mode and proceeding to provide a list of links highlighting prejudices against Muslims and had sought to align me - again from what I can tell - with the likes of the perpetrators. Which is, profoundly much more than annoying. But it’s a forum and I’m more than happy to explain myself, that’s the good thing about the written word, you can take the time to state your case. And people can’t change the words to fit. So the acts are “linked” to Islam, yes they are, it doesn’t mean they are unique to Islam, it doesn’t mean they started with Islam, it means that purportedly strict practitioners and followers of Islam practice these things all the time. It’s not me being a right wing Islamophobe, or even being ambiguous, I have tried to be very succinct, but it seems you have to write essays just to justify linking these acts to the faith, question is why? Why is it such a terrible act to link them? They are problems within Islam, are you going to refute that? So the fact that similar things happen outside of Islam doesn’t change things.
Mr Truth, why should I start with this? Of course, I can start a thread (or maybe you can) to discuss the atrocities occurring within other religions. No problem. I don’t see why this means I am not allowed to talk about the issues within Islam.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
Bookmarks