Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Human Rights


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2004, 02:21 AM
Guevara
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Guantanamo Bay - Human Rights

http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGIOR410242004

Commission on Human Rights, 60th Session (15 March - 23 April 2004)
The human rights scandal of Guantanamo Bay

Amnesty International welcomes consideration by the UN Commission on Human Rights of the situation of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay. This is long overdue.

More than two years after the first of the detainees arrived in the US Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Camp X-Ray and its successor Camp Delta, the United States Government continues to exert unfettered executive power in total disregard for the rule of law. Hundreds of detainees remain held in tiny cells for up to 24 hours a day without any legal process.

International law has been flouted from the outset. None of the detainees was granted prisoner of war status nor brought before a competent tribunal to determine his status, as required by the Third Geneva Convention. None has been granted access to a court to be able to challenge the lawfulness of his detention, as required by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 9) to which the United States is a party. Detainees have been denied access to legal counsel and their families. When a state, let alone one as powerful as the United States of America, adopts a selective approach to international law and standards, the integrity of those standards is eroded.

While welcoming that the Commission will consider the arbitrary detention of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Amnesty International is concerned that the Commission has not been asked to consider other human rights violations involving the detainees. These include the cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of detainees and refoulement to countries where released detainees are in danger of torture or other serious human rights violations.

The International Committee of the Red Cross has taken the unusual step of going public about the deterioration in mental health it has witnessed among many of the detainees as a result of the indefinite and isolating incarceration regime. Amnesty International considers the totality of the conditions in which most of the detainees in Guantanamo Bay are held amounts to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

According to a statement by the Department of Defense on 2 April 2004, 146 prisoners have been transferred from Guantanamo Bay to their countries of origin leaving "approximately 595" detainees in the base. Most have been released upon return, but at least 12 have been transferred for continued detention in their home countries. While welcoming releases, Amnesty International is concerned that some detainees may be at risk of serious human rights violations if returned to their home countries for continued detention. Amnesty International considers that the US authorities have a responsibility to ensure that the human rights of the detainees will be fully respected after their transfer.

Guantanamo Bay is a human rights scandal, and Amnesty International believes that the Commission on Human Rights must urgently address this situation in all its aspects. Amnesty International considers that draft resolution L.88 on the question of arbitrary detention in the area of the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo is a welcome development, but it does not go far enough.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2004, 04:06 AM
SporkLord SporkLord is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,517
SporkLord is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,451
Default -

At least someone remembered they are still there.
Sounds like the US wants to lock them up and imprison them until death.

They aren't under US law.
They aren't under Cuban law.
They aren't under International law.
So under whose law are they?

Sounds like they're planning to make Guantanamo a new Siberia.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2004, 04:37 AM
solpadeine's Avatar
solpadeine solpadeine is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 88
solpadeine is on a distinguished road
Credits: 725
Default So

Yeah, but they're terrorists.











Aren't they?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2004, 06:47 AM
SporkLord SporkLord is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,517
SporkLord is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,451
Default Argh double post...

Quote:
Originally Posted by solpadeine";p=&quot View Post
Yeah, but they're terrorists.











Aren't they?
Only if we believe what Bush claims they are. We can't determine are they terrorists because they are seemingly never going to be tried.

They had relatively few qualms about eventually releasing a few British nationals. Guessing they weren't terrorists after all, were they?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2004, 11:43 AM
Niceguy Niceguy is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 480
Niceguy is on a distinguished road
Credits: 3,665
Default Punish those who obey illegal orders.

Since this confinement of people without trial or recognition as prisoners of war are an international crime, I suggest that ANY person that takes part of this confinement should be considered as a criminal. Just imagine what would happen if a soldier got arrested for the crime of serving on the Guantanamo bay base, this would serve them right.

I also suggest an new international law that states that whenever someone use the classical "I just obeyed orders" defense, then their punishment should be multiplied by an factor of 5 or more, just because of that. Hopefully this will lead to a situating when people will actually start to disobey illegal orders.

Imagine this in Guantanamo:
Officer: -Guard these prisoners.
Soldier: -Sir no sir!! -These prisoners are kept here illegally, if I guard them I would become a criminal myself as you already are by issuing me these illegal orders. I am sorry sir but I must refuse!!!

I want it to become really expensive to commit the mistake of obeying the wrong orders.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2004, 08:54 AM
Headless-Pixie's Avatar
Headless-Pixie Headless-Pixie is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,165
Headless-Pixie is on a distinguished road
Credits: 6,586
Send a message via MSN to Headless-Pixie
Default so?

Whather terrorist or not a trial is still needed to dtermine if they are.
__________________
What's this i hear bed? Word has it you and Pam are sleeping together.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2004, 10:16 AM
Swedish-Comrade's Avatar
Swedish-Comrade Swedish-Comrade is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden!
Posts: 37
Swedish-Comrade is on a distinguished road
Credits: 376
Default true

terrorist or not, they are still humans and we should treat humans as humans. They should have a trail under international law and court and then jailed or gone fri
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden