Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Human Rights


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1191 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 05:25 AM
Sickntiredofliblies's Avatar
Sickntiredofliblies Sickntiredofliblies is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas till I die!
Posts: 2,341
usa us texas
Sickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud ofSickntiredofliblies has much to be proud of
Credits: 11,891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellah View Post
Making a work place and public venues as safe as is reasonably possible is common sense. Its easy and reasonable to prohibit smokers from smoking in closed public places and venues and keep their smoking habit at home or in their own personal spaces (like their own cars) OR they can also smoke in the outdoors where people are not closed in and breathing in their smoke.
It would be much easier if we didn't have to pass laws and enforce your choices on the rest of us. It would be much easier for you to choose wisely.

Quote:
They can also choose to use other delivery systems for their nicotine when in closed public spaces. They really do have choices.
This is you telling me what to do with my body.

Quote:
Its not about entitlement to your property, its the fact that your property is a commercial one and has to abide by regulations that protect the public health, the workers and environment you are in. You even have to abide by zoning regulations as well and cant run any sort of business you want in any location you want.
If your biggest concern is protecting the workers you are barking up the wrong tree. Surely our time would be much better spent securing job sites that are much more dangerous. http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/...tra/P63405.asp Bartenders and waitresses aren't on that list and I'd imagine they aren't even in the top 100. As somebody said before. Second hand smoke has never been listed as a reason of death. Meanwhile the food served at restaurants has often killed people.
Quote:
Your individual rights end when they are inteferring and denying the next person their rights.
Again, you do not have a right to my jobs nor a right to visit my property. I on the other hand have the right to refuse your job application and kick people off my property!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellah View Post
But having a job isnt a choice..its an absolute neccessity.
That is false and nothing but a generalization. Some people do not NEED a job. There is nothing mentioned about jobs in the bill of rights. This is why I'm am not REQUIRED to hire you. Hiring someone that can't stand smoke in a bar is almost as stupid as hiring a male stripper at a gentleman's club. Nobody's forcing you to work at smoky places. You have other options. You just do not want to choose for yourself and would rather force your will on the rest of us.
__________________
Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness ~Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #1192 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 07:49 AM
Jellah's Avatar
Jellah Jellah is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: American living in Sweden
Posts: 2,129
Jellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 19,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickntiredofliblies View Post
It would be much easier if we didn't have to pass laws and enforce your choices on the rest of us. It would be much easier for you to choose wisely.
I do choose not to smoke which I think is a wise choice and your individual rights dont extend to forcing your smoke onto me...which you ARE doing when you smoke in public venues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickntiredofliblies View Post
This is you telling me what to do with my body.
Do what you want with your body...but the choices you make on what to do to your body must not be done to mine against my will. Again the act of smoking means that the people in your immediate vicinity will be breathing in your smoke and they cant choose to "not breath".

The burden of your choices and vices are on your shoulders.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickntiredofliblies View Post
If your biggest concern is protecting the workers you are barking up the wrong tree. Surely our time would be much better spent securing job sites that are much more dangerous. http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/...tra/P63405.asp Bartenders and waitresses aren't on that list and I'd imagine they aren't even in the top 100. As somebody said before. Second hand smoke has never been listed as a reason of death. Meanwhile the food served at restaurants has often killed people.
If the food has killed people that would mean they werent in compliance with regulations and that is not only a civil suit..that can be considered a criminal issue as well.

They dont list smoking as cause of death either....they also dont list over eating as cause of death or bad eating habits combined with lack of exercize as the cause of death...they say stuff like...Lung Cancer, Diabetes, Heart attack, Stroke etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickntiredofliblies View Post
Again, you do not have a right to my jobs nor a right to visit my property. I on the other hand have the right to refuse your job application and kick people off my property!
There are regulations and guidelines you must follow if you choose to engage in a commercial business and you cannot expect the same lack of regulation that you would have on your private home to extend to your commercial business.

If you dont like that, then you have the option to not engage in such ownership and responsiblity.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickntiredofliblies View Post
That is false and nothing but a generalization. Some people do not NEED a job. There is nothing mentioned about jobs in the bill of rights. This is why I'm am not REQUIRED to hire you. Hiring someone that can't stand smoke in a bar is almost as stupid as hiring a male stripper at a gentleman's club. Nobody's forcing you to work at smoky places. You have other options. You just do not want to choose for yourself and would rather force your will on the rest of us.
The absolute vast majority of people need jobs...you have some Paris Hiltons running around but over 90% of the population need to work to keep shelter, food and clothing needs fullfilled.

Its just fiction to pretend there is sooo much freedom of choice and not recognize the nature of those needing employment and how easy it is to take advantage of them because without those regulations, laws, guidelines and protections they are extremely vulnerable and will be abused and have no other options.

Take responsibility for your own habit and be responsible with your own smoke and dont force it upon others who have to share a public world with you and choose not to smoke and damage their lungs. They shouldnt have to suffer to accomodate your addiction and choice.
__________________
"You can't go around building a better world for people. Only people
can build a better world for people. Otherwise it's just a cage."
-- (Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad)
Reply With Quote
  #1193 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 08:53 AM
Anikdote's Avatar
Anikdote Anikdote is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: here
Posts: 4,349
usa us georgia
Anikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 18,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellah View Post
There are regulations and guidelines you must follow if you choose to engage in a commercial business and you cannot expect the same lack of regulation that you would have on your private home to extend to your commercial business.

If you dont like that, then you have the option to not engage in such ownership and responsiblity.
OR! I can fire you and find someone else that isn't going to (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) and moan about my the choices I make on MY property.

I think the better option is just not to hire people who think they have the right to tell me what I can and can't do on property that I own and pay for.
__________________

Love Freedom?
Reply With Quote
  #1194 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 08:58 AM
Jellah's Avatar
Jellah Jellah is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: American living in Sweden
Posts: 2,129
Jellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 19,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anikdote View Post
OR! I can fire you and find someone else that isn't going to (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) and moan about my the choices I make on MY property.

I think the better option is just not to hire people who think they have the right to tell me what I can and can't do on property that I own and pay for.
Ignoring the differences between commercial property and private residence type property isnt going to make it go away.
__________________
"You can't go around building a better world for people. Only people
can build a better world for people. Otherwise it's just a cage."
-- (Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad)
Reply With Quote
  #1195 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 09:23 AM
Anikdote's Avatar
Anikdote Anikdote is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: here
Posts: 4,349
usa us georgia
Anikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 18,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellah View Post
Ignoring the differences between commercial property and private residence type property isnt going to make it go away.
Pretending like your not infringing upon the rights of private property owners also doesn't mean your aren't.

You believe your right not to smell smoke is more important than the rights of the guy who pays for the property that your standing on, gotcha.
__________________

Love Freedom?
Reply With Quote
  #1196 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 10:32 AM
heikstheo heikstheo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ottawa County, Ohio
Age: 46
Posts: 4,935
usa us ohio
heikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 19,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellah View Post
How do you actually know if the MAJORITY smoke or not? That sounds like an assumption more than a fact.
Because I hang out in bars and therefore I can say that the majority of bartenders and bartendresses do in fact smoke.
__________________
Theodore Lamar Heiks
BA, History/Political Science, Western State College of Colorado, 1984
MBA, Entrepreneurship/Marketing, City University of Seattle, 1993

Last edited by heikstheo; 10-13-2008 at 10:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #1197 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 10:34 AM
heikstheo heikstheo is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ottawa County, Ohio
Age: 46
Posts: 4,935
usa us ohio
heikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to beholdheikstheo is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 19,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellah View Post
Secondly, it doesnt matter if they do smoke or not....creating a safe and as healthy a work environment as we can provide is what we do to protect all involved.
In other words, the nanny state is responsible for protecting people from engaging in adult activities they would like to engage in.
__________________
Theodore Lamar Heiks
BA, History/Political Science, Western State College of Colorado, 1984
MBA, Entrepreneurship/Marketing, City University of Seattle, 1993
Reply With Quote
  #1198 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 12:15 PM
chevy28360 chevy28360 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 171
chevy28360 has a spectacular aura aboutchevy28360 has a spectacular aura aboutchevy28360 has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 1,469
Default

Bah. I don't think any substance you wish to use should be illegal. Addiction, whether its cannibis or watching too much television, is a social problem, not a criminal one.
Reply With Quote
  #1199 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 01:20 PM
Jellah's Avatar
Jellah Jellah is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: American living in Sweden
Posts: 2,129
Jellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond reputeJellah has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 19,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heikstheo View Post
In other words, the nanny state is responsible for protecting people from engaging in adult activities they would like to engage in.
No, the people are THE STATE. Its been due to a push from the public to create laws and protections for ourselves and our societies.

You can engage in smoking....you just cant do so in a way that interferes with the health and rights of others. Your rights stop at the point that they begin to infringe upon anothers rights.
__________________
"You can't go around building a better world for people. Only people
can build a better world for people. Otherwise it's just a cage."
-- (Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad)
Reply With Quote
  #1200 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 01:22 PM
presluc's Avatar
presluc presluc is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: michigan
Posts: 1,402
usa us michigan
presluc has a spectacular aura aboutpresluc has a spectacular aura aboutpresluc has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 7,053
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellah View Post
Both smokers and non-smokers can go to the restaurants, smokers themselves arent prohibited...just the actual act of smoking is.

Police and fireman have jobs where the danger is inherent and cannot be avoided and all dangers that CAN be avoided...are avoided. Thats why they have guns, safety equipment, partners, handcuffs, a partition between the back seat and front seat, protocols to follow etc.

People also arent diagnosed with death by eating to much chips...its usually labeled as heart disease or stroke etc. Even smokers arent diagnosed to have died by smoking..its usually lung cancer, emphysema etc.

Again, why not simply use a different delivery method for your nicotine when you are out at that restaurant?

Your addiction is your own burden to bare and other peoples health should not have to be affected to accomodate your choices.
Smokers and nonsmokers can go to restuarants they just can't smoke.
Well what about a 300 pound slob going to a restuarant should they be limited to only eating salads, or the cell phones you can come to the restuarant but you can't use your cell phone in the resturant.

Why not have a resturant that only hires smokers and only caters to smokers.
Kinda like nonsmoking resturants, nonsmokers would be welcome but they would not have to smoke.

I mind my own business other people healthy or otherwise should mind their own.
I force nobody to think as I do or have the same habits as I do I would expect no more nor no less from other people.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden