Thread: Protecting the sanctity of marriage

Originally Posted by Heretic

No, I'm just pointing out the double standard to you.

Here's how the order of blame goes:

1. God, God is ultimately to "blame" for all things
2. Christ, Son of God, is to "blame" for all Good doings of mankind
3. Man, men are made in the image of God, followers of Christ, and more "criminalized" than women or children
4. Woman, women are made in the image of men, followers of men, and least "criminalized". Women are generally "innocent" and protected.
5. Children, children are least "guilty" and "blamed" of all the human specie, responsibility is something completey unknown and foreign to them, this is "innocence".

And yet God repeatedly orders the murder en masse of category 5 in the Old Testament. Genocide of innocents, you say?

Originally Posted by thebrucebeat

And yet God repeatedly orders the murder en masse of category 5 in the Old Testament. Genocide of innocents, you say?

Of course! It was for the greater good

Originally Posted by Heretic

Of course Liberal does not want to protect the sanctity of marriage. The OP proves this.

Your little comic strip would be funnier, if you knew the difference.

Why are liberals so against adult men and fathers protecting the chastity and virtue of their daughters? I'll tell you why....because they're rapists who want the cow's milk for free.

is this what republican mean by traditional marriage?

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...29&version=NIV

Deuteronomy 22:28-29

28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered,
29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. [a] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

Originally Posted by Wolverine

Yep, and its sad. Its the 21st century and some people still think like the dinosaurs of the early 19th century.

Originally Posted by SpaceCricket79

Henry VIII wanted to have his marriage annulled and the Pope didn't let him, so he started his own church (The Church of England). Get your facts straight.

My facts are perfectly straight. Henry VIII destroyed marriage and the sanctity thereof. Now if you want to argue that the Church of England is just a church and not a whole new religion, you might have a point, but I don't care.

Marriage = one man/one woman, not one man/one woman AT A TIME. - What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder - and all that happy crap.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29

28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered,
29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. [a] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

So you find the best looking, most well built (for reproduction purposes), and richest 13 year old virgin, rape her and it's like winning the lottery?

My point is that the 'sanctity' of marriage ended a few hundred years ago despite all the DOMA chuckleheads and their war on gays. How many times does one man have to say "til death do we part" that it becomes bullcrap?

Originally Posted by Phoebe Bump

My point is that the 'sanctity' of marriage ended a few hundred years ago despite all the DOMA chuckleheads and their war on gays. How many times does one man have to say "til death do we part" that it becomes bullcrap?

So do you believe in divorce, or just not legal separation by guillotine?


Let’s face it if there wasn’t an exit strategy for wedded bliss, more marriages would end in the making of funeral arrangements.

Originally Posted by Wolverine

Originally Posted by Heretic

Of course Liberal does not want to protect the sanctity of marriage. The OP proves this.

Your little comic strip would be funnier, if you knew the difference.

Why are liberals so against adult men and fathers protecting the chastity and virtue of their daughters? I'll tell you why....because they're rapists who want the cow's milk for free.

What, exactly, does the OP have to do with "chastity and virtue of their daughters"? Are you saying interracial marriage violates someone's virtue?

Originally Posted by JoeSixpack

So you find the best looking, most well built (for reproduction purposes), and richest 13 year old virgin, rape her and it's like winning the lottery?

If she has a Christian father, you know, a father that actually CARES for her and LOVES her, and protects her virtue.....then you are going to face the wrath of his retribution. And God's Laws support revenge against rapists. The father of the daughter has every right to complete revenge, JUSTICE, against you.

Did you read the story about the father who murdered a man in Texas this week, since he was attempting to rape his daughter??? That is condoned by Christian laws. A father may do as he pleases, against all forces, to protect the integrity of HIS family. Rapists ought to fear the wrath of a father, more than any "state laws" or institutions. We all know, and can see, how much the Obama administration and the other zio-liberfascists value "traditional family". In other words, Libs hate traditional family, and hate chaste young girls and women.

Liberals hate virginity, and love sluts/prostitutes. Libs are anti-virtue, pro-degeneracy.