View Poll Results: Do you think immigration should be restricted based on ethnicity/race?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, my children should not have to live in an ethnically diverse nation

    6 30.00%
  • No, but I generally prefer to be amongst people more ethnically/culturally similar to me

    2 10.00%
  • I am NOT an ethnic minority, and ethnicity does not matter

    11 55.00%
  • I AM an ethnic minority, and more minorities should be allowed in

    1 5.00%
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 57

Thread: Feelings about Ethnic Diversity?

  1. #31
    wales uk wales
    Location: UK, Cymru mostly, sometimes England.
    Posts: 7,320

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TopCat View Post
    You sound like Anthony Blair, who stated the other week that the "European Integration Project" (if that language doesn't give away the true agenda then nothing will) was going to go ahead, "like it or not".

    In other words stuff the working class and the majority, who have never been enamored with this multi-culti Star Trek global government / one world fantasy and the other modish left wing beliefs of the day. Totalitarian mentality in a nutshell.

    Edit: You come from Wales. How "diverse" is your area I wonder? It's just that I see a large number of ultra militant Scots, Welsh and Irish on here (I don't think I've ever met a Scot who wasn't a raving mad Marxist) who promote mass immigration and "diversity" and yet I have the sneaky suspicion that none of them live in areas which are even remotely "enriched".
    Well, fair play, two hits there. Bliar is no admiration of mine, and we do suffer from incredible levels of immigration - there is one of our constituencies where the majority are foreigners, mainly from Lancashire. Nevertheless, the general point does stand: capitalism will get a cheap workforce where it can (though it will also set up the mobs to attack them in one of its inevitable slumps) and poor people - like all our ancestors - will move to where they can get a better living. What's more, as in the Rhondda where I come from, a mixed population is manifestly superior in most ways, as was ours to any other in the UK until the capitalists destroyed it. Grin and bear it!
    Last edited by Iolo; Jul 04 2012 at 04:59 AM.
    Gobeithiaw y ddaw ydd wyf.


  2. #32
    wales uk wales
    Location: UK, Cymru mostly, sometimes England.
    Posts: 7,320

    Default

    Sorry - double post caused by impatience with snail-system.
    Last edited by Iolo; Jul 04 2012 at 04:56 AM.
    Gobeithiaw y ddaw ydd wyf.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anders Hoveland View Post
    I prefer being around other people of my same ethnicity, and would not enjoy it if everyone else around me was from a different ethnicity.
    It is both their physical appearance and the cultural differences. I also question how much of these "cultural" differences are truely cultural, and whether they are ever going to go away once the newcomers fully "assimilate". (there may likely be some genetic influence on behaviour and personality)

    I am concerned that my ethnicity may become a minority in our country within a relatively short period of time, and think that our descendents will not be the happiest living as a minority. These will be people they will have to interact with everyday in school and work.

    So my question is: Am I the only one that prefers being around my same ethnicity? Or do most people not have any problem with this?
    I don't care what ethnicity or race someone is. I care about a person's attitude towards this country, what future they have in mind for their country. If I lived in a nation of blacks or hispanics who held my same values---I'd be a happy camper.

    I really have a hard time with people that assume minorities have to think a certain way. I've met too many that I share too much with to boil it all down to the color of skin.

  4. Default

    When one entrenched ethnicity insists on holding ecconomic and social power toward no other end than to hold that power, there will always be racial and cultural tension. Yugoslavia is a good example of that. The Serbs decided that they would have to be the ones to set the tone for the entire nation.

    The only difference between a Serb and a Croat or a Bosnian is religion. They all speak Serbo-Croation, although the Serbs insist on writing it in Cyrilic script.

    How well did that work out?
    No civilization ever collapsed because the poor had too much to eat.

  5. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MegadethFan View Post
    Cultural diversity is another thing, but like ethnic diversity, is entirely fine and not open to restriction in a free society.
    Nope, this is true only to some limited degree. Certain cultural elements may be considered harmful or even illegal by the dominant culture, and rightly so. Cultural diversity describes not only harmless kebabs, but can also range from higher crime or unemployment rate to things like female genital mutilation, religious extremism and a whole way of life sometimes incompatible with others.

    So, contrary to ethnic diversity, one can certainly be justifiably opposed to some aspects of cultural diversity, as it is a completely different matter. There is no reason why cultural diversity or culture in general should be made into any kind of a holy cow.
    "Billions for equal chances, not a penny for equal results."

    Charles Murray

  6. #36

    Default

    When one entrenched political insists on holding ecconomic and social power toward no other end than to hold that power and reap the financial benefits thereof, there will always be racial and cultural tension. Democrats are the example in the U.S.
    Last edited by PatrickT; Jul 05 2012 at 06:41 AM.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anders Hoveland View Post
    I prefer being around other people of my same ethnicity, and would not enjoy it if everyone else around me was from a different ethnicity.
    It is both their physical appearance and the cultural differences. I also question how much of these "cultural" differences are truely cultural, and whether they are ever going to go away once the newcomers fully "assimilate". (there may likely be some genetic influence on behaviour and personality)

    I am concerned that my ethnicity may become a minority in our country within a relatively short period of time, and think that our descendents will not be the happiest living as a minority. These will be people they will have to interact with everyday in school and work.

    So my question is: Am I the only one that prefers being around my same ethnicity? Or do most people not have any problem with this?
    LOL. Any dude would go after a good looking girl regardless of skin color if he was single and she was game. Some even if they weren't single. Racism is like homophobia, exist primarily in men and is directed primarily at men. A pride thing.
    Funny how when one talks of trade, national borders are imaginary. When one talks of immigration, national borders are imaginary. But when one talks of expansionism and imperialism, national borders become very real.

    I am Nationalist Capitalist. Labor in control of the state, with the means of production in private hands.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CKW View Post
    I don't care what ethnicity or race someone is. I care about a person's attitude towards this country, what future they have in mind for their country. If I lived in a nation of blacks or hispanics who held my same values---I'd be a happy camper.

    I really have a hard time with people that assume minorities have to think a certain way. I've met too many that I share too much with to boil it all down to the color of skin.
    Cool. You can live in South Africa then. Becareful though, the blacks there are murdering white people on a genocidal level, so watch your back.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blasphemer View Post
    Nope, this is true only to some limited degree. Certain cultural elements may be considered harmful or even illegal by the dominant culture, and rightly so. Cultural diversity describes not only harmless kebabs, but can also range from higher crime or unemployment rate to things like female genital mutilation, religious extremism and a whole way of life sometimes incompatible with others.
    The difference here is how one defines culture. I'm using the word as relative to personal preference. So genital mutilation, religious fundamentalism and other insanities are fine as long it in thew sphere of one individual over their own mind and body.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blasphemer View Post
    So, contrary to ethnic diversity, one can certainly be justifiably opposed to some aspects of cultural diversity, as it is a completely different matter. There is no reason why cultural diversity or culture in general should be made into any kind of a holy cow.
    As I say, I used the two descriptions in relation to personal choices and preferences. Social policies or laws are another matter, but its rather obvious that in order to have cultural diversity one requires one codified form of law, else cultural diversity could not exist, if that makes sense.

    I agree with what you have said, the thing is I was making a slightly different point.
    ---------------------------
    I'm willing to change my position at any time on any issue. I have done so in the past. All you need is a logical, provable case, and I'm all in. The question is, have you got what it takes?
    Oh, and just so you're not confused, I'm an apatheist libertarian.

    "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." --Noam Chomsky

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PatrickT View Post
    When one entrenched political insists on holding ecconomic and social power toward no other end than to hold that power and reap the financial benefits thereof, there will always be racial and cultural tension. Democrats are the example in the U.S.
    Democrats arent the only ones, that's for sure, nor are all Democrats valid examples. In fact your mention of Democrats so vaguely is more insightful of your ignorance and prejudice than the validity of your point.
    ---------------------------
    I'm willing to change my position at any time on any issue. I have done so in the past. All you need is a logical, provable case, and I'm all in. The question is, have you got what it takes?
    Oh, and just so you're not confused, I'm an apatheist libertarian.

    "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." --Noam Chomsky

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks