
Originally Posted by
Blasphemer
Nope, this is true only to some limited degree. Certain cultural elements may be considered harmful or even illegal by the dominant culture, and rightly so. Cultural diversity describes not only harmless kebabs, but can also range from higher crime or unemployment rate to things like female genital mutilation, religious extremism and a whole way of life sometimes incompatible with others.
The difference here is how one defines culture. I'm using the word as relative to personal preference. So genital mutilation, religious fundamentalism and other insanities are fine as long it in thew sphere of one individual over their own mind and body.

Originally Posted by
Blasphemer
So, contrary to ethnic diversity, one can certainly be justifiably opposed to some aspects of cultural diversity, as it is a completely different matter. There is no reason why cultural diversity or culture in general should be made into any kind of a holy cow.
As I say, I used the two descriptions in relation to personal choices and preferences. Social policies or laws are another matter, but its rather obvious that in order to have cultural diversity one requires one codified form of law, else cultural diversity could not exist, if that makes sense.
I agree with what you have said, the thing is I was making a slightly different point.
---------------------------
I'm willing to change my position at any time on any issue. I have done so in the past. All you need is a logical, provable case, and I'm all in. The question is, have you got what it takes?
Oh, and just so you're not confused, I'm an apatheist libertarian.
"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." --Noam Chomsky
Bookmarks