But it's not multicultralism or diversity is it. Like everything else in the revolution it's some sort of satanic inversion where the true meaning is the exact opposite. What the revolution seeks is a monoculture or Homo Sovieticus. No loyalty to anything but global government.
Seems like something Bill Clinton would have sponsored considering his popularity-winning speeches (corrupting those of MLK Jr.) of how he looks forward to a brighter day when there will be a homogeneous society throughout the land. So one way or another the parody seems pretty accurate how politicians and social media try to get in your bedroom.
My question is, am I an ENEMY OF THE STATE for not wanting my children or grandchildren to look like Whoopi Goldberg?
You have some fetish for Whoopi after watching "Made in America", but are in denial? I think it would make sense to say that every ethnic group or population has a right to exist and advance their culture within certain geographic boundaries, rather than having to constantly put up with pretenses of the alien newcomers who try to erradicate the old culture while transplanting theirs. Look at the pathetic state of the music industry today in contrast to where it was 15, 20, 30 years ago. Do you believe the way to solve the Developing World's Malthusian population-growth crisis is to facilitate population transfers from areas of high to low density at the cost of lowering the standard of living to all and over-exploiting land and resources, rather than to promote family planning where the problem originates? Are you some kind of a world monoculture crusader who hates world diversity?
Whoa, you're all over the place! First, I want my kids and grandkids to look like me! Second, population transfers will only destroy the West - we are seeing this right now. I moreover, donating more "aid" to places like Africa and Haiti will only empower them to breed more. Europeans subsidizing the fertility of the brown world, all the while they are projected to become minorities within their own countries by mid-century, is tantamount to suicide. I say stop all aid to Africa and let nature take its course.
What does aid have to do with border control or a rational immigration policy? There are different types of aid, starting with a natural disasters aid which is a natural and comassionate thing to do for anyone. On the other hand, it would make sense to provide a condition in giving a general economic aid to nations with a population-doubling growth of 30 years and such, that they aggressively promote family planning.
Aid only creates more unwanted little ones. You are talking about people who have no written language, or recorded history. Even their languages of eeks and ooks do without words like 'precision', 'morality' or 'philosophical'.
Why should it be of any concern to you or me what anyone is doing in their own land? That's for them to decide. You can use aid of course to promote things like education or a higher standard of living rather than simply investing in bigger families.
Every nation has its own government. If they are incompetent in dealing with problems before them, then their voters or subjects should learn from this and get themselves a new set of leaders. Why should some be held accountable for the incompetence of governments of others? There is enough incompetence occurring daily domestically.