Is PF overrun with Racists?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by Mushroom, Jul 18, 2012.

?

Are there more racists here then there should be?

  1. Yes, this board is full of them

    67 vote(s)
    48.9%
  2. Yes, there are a few more but not all that many

    22 vote(s)
    16.1%
  3. No, there are only a few of them here

    27 vote(s)
    19.7%
  4. Racists? I have never seen racists here

    6 vote(s)
    4.4%
  5. A single racist is to many racists

    2 vote(s)
    1.5%
  6. There should be more Racists here

    13 vote(s)
    9.5%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Akula

    Akula Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Great..an "essay"...from a canadian website..
    LMFAO..Canada..a nation with a 7% black population, being referenced by a poster who lives in a town with 4% black population...

    Too funny.
     
  2. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,490
    Likes Received:
    2,226
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    PF is kind of like Section 8 housing for racists. They gotta live somewhere, you know, so it may as well be in our neighborhood. It's NIMBYism to say that they shouldn't be allowed near us. Our job is to civilize the racists, to train them to act like decent human beings. If it's successful, they'll eventually be able to return to mainstream society.
     
  3. Glock

    Glock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Messages:
    4,796
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    48
    yea...nothing racist here...
     
  4. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,614
    Likes Received:
    2,492
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is rediculous to say, because it is also a suburb of Seattle. You can make the same types of claims about some parts of LA, but to then turn around and try to claim that they have no interactions is simply a silly claim, with absolutely no basis in reality.

    Yes, it is. I voted "yes", and I am not Jewish. That is stereotyping, and apparently placing those you do not agree with into a group you do not like.

    Sadly, I don't see that ever happening. These people are totally unable to see anything wrong with what they do, and I would believe any claims that they have been "reformed" no more then those of George Wallace when he "reformed".
     
  5. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually victim reports also implicate blacks and tally with the arrest rate. In fact they suggest blacks are more likely to escape arrest.
     
  6. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh thank you for bringing perspective to this 'discussion'- I love your post.
     
  7. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Have you had any luck civilizing Zionist Jewish supremacist racists?
     
  8. Shiva_TD

    Shiva_TD Progressive Libertarian Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    45,715
    Likes Received:
    885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In short, since the facts cannot be disputed,attack the source. It's not like predictability of a response is even hard. Call it lies, garbage and/or attack the source because the facts don't fit with preconceived beliefs based upon half-truths.
     
  9. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The facts are disputed. Your source claims "racist police" only arrest blacks. Yet the victim reports also report blacks, and match the arrest rates.
     
  10. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,614
    Likes Received:
    2,492
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za_BUZSTTW4

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  11. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No luck 'civilizing' anyone- not white bigots, not zionist bigots, not black bigots, not race hating bigots...

    I am just not having any luck civilizing anyone. Hmmmmm maybe we shouldn't be trying to civilize them but act civilized ourselves
     
  12. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, I think we should try to civilize Zionist Jewish supremacist racist bigots.
     
  13. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do you only want to civilize the one brand of bigot you oppose? Why are vast number of White Supremist bigots okay, but Zionist 'Jewish" bigots not?

    Why are Christian "hate the jew" bigots okay, but not Jewish bigots?

    I happen to be equally against all of you.
     
  14. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Zionist Jewish supremacist racist bigots are by far the biggest problem in the world today.
     
  15. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Mike is right that jewish zionists are the greatest threat to mankind today. But I'm curious, if you are equally against Christians and jews per se, then what group of people do you favor or represent? In other words...who's left besides the commies, the Satanists and the radical Islamic Jihadists for you to side with?
     
  16. Shiva_TD

    Shiva_TD Progressive Libertarian Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    45,715
    Likes Received:
    885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    50% of those in State prisons are there solely for drug offenses which are victimless crimes. There is no "victim" report related to these criminal prosecutions. Of course the entire article was rejected without reading it or this part wouldn't have been missed:

    Two indiputable facts. First of all we have counties where 100% of the drug prosecutions were for minorities where 60% of the drug users where white. Next we have the "crack" cocaine laws which were specifically created based upon racist criteria. Cocaine is cocaine regardless of what form it's in and everyone knows that.
     
  17. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Did you ever consider that with the fact that WHITES have a higher IQ than that of blacks that the WHITES used their intelligence to partake in those hi-test drugs in the safe confines of their residences, whereas, the stupid and ignorant blacks were either selling or mainlining those drugs out in the ghettos where naturally the cops were out in full force to prevent crime? Thus, the reason the high proportion of incarcerated blacks.
     
  18. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, there may be some disparity in terms of drug offences. I don't really know the situation.

    But it's definitely true for murder, rape and robbery.
     
  19. sec

    sec Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    31,803
    Likes Received:
    7,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have been told that since I am against liberalism that it's only because I'm a racist so yes, I guess you can chalk me up as a racist.
     
  20. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,614
    Likes Received:
    2,492
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Funny how this seems to be. Yet how real is it?

    My wife was raped, by a white man.

    A good friend of mine was murdered, by a white man.

    I have been robbed 3 times in my life. Twice by white men, once by 2 black kids (who are BTW doing 5 and 20 years for their crime).

    I also worked at a place that was robbed 3 times while I worked there. And while all 3 times was by blacks, this was simply how gang robberies were done in LA in the early 1980's. I lived in a White-Hispanic area, so the blacks came here to do their robberies (back then you did not "deficate in your own neighborhood). And the Hispanic and White gangbangers went down to South-Central to do the same thing. If I had woreked in Compton at the time, most of the robberies would have been whites or Hispanics.

    This is why I always question these statistics. The vast majority of those who are attacked by druggies are druggies themselves. So I actually find myself giving them very little pity for being attacked or killed. And most victims of rape actually know their attackers, so the actual race largely becomes irrelevant.

    I actually laugh when people like you scream about "race crime". Because I see most of it as crap. I have lived in some of the worst ghettos in LA, and never got attacked. Watts, Compton, Inglewood, Pacoima, Hollywood, none of it mattered to me. I never got hastled, never once was attacked in all the years I lived in places like that.

    Then again, I do not touch drugs, do not belong to a gang, and do not associate with individuals that do. The vast majority of murders and assaults in LA are related to either gang or drug use. And since these do not apply, the odds of my being a victim are microscopic.

    All you do is play with the data, and is mostly makes me laugh. A racist Brit, thinking he knows more about race crime in the US then people who actually live here.
     
  21. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks for your life story. :sleepy:

    Try reading this.

    I like how you commit the worst statistical fallacy in the book then accuse me of "playing with the data".

    The credibility meter is hitting zero.
     
  22. Mr. Swedish Guy

    Mr. Swedish Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    11,688
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I just have to agree slightly with a quoted post a bit up..

    Black females aren't very attractive :O Neither are the males. Though I could add that this only applies to those living in africa (may be exceptions of course, have only watched from TV after all). So skinny, no breasts, and you can't even tell the difference between the sexes.. Horrible, glad i'm living in sweden.
     
  23. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Personally I think that is an idiotic opinion.

    But it is your opinion and you are entitled to have whatever opinion you want.

    I think all bigots, including Jewish bigots and anti-semite bigots are just as much of a problem- which is essentially annoying like that yappy dog next door.
     
  24. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is "anti-Semitism" (opposition to Judaism) necessarily a form of bigotry? How do you define bigotry?
     
  25. Dan40

    Dan40 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,560
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anti-Semitism is bigotry, and prejudice, and hate, but for the Jewish religion. Racism is the same thing but for color or ethnic background. Two petals of the same noxious weed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page