Seen it. Kevin Barrett does not have a 'background' in anything to do with aircraft accidents or aviation, not to mention, his part in that takes around 30 seconds, and already he's told about 5 lies. The only credible person there who one could take note of is the P4T pilot. Except he's going on about lack of wreckage.. an amateur argument I would expect better from a pilot. He obviously has no idea what he is talking about. Hell, my blog proves him wrong.
I am not going to sit through another hour of Von Kleist's Nazi disinfo. The stupid SOB expects us to take Sophia "Klunkety-klunk" Shafquat seriously. That should tell anybody with an IQ over room temp that he has no freaking clue.
yeah their bosses sure pay them a lot of money to come here and post.no way would they do it EVERDAY month after month like they do ambarrassing themselves like they and keep coming back for their arse beatings like they do everyday without getting paid.thats a dead giveaway there they get paid.
The real world: come join it sometime. The nonsense your write.....jesus christ it's so detached from reality. I will be honest and say your posts give me a bit of schadenfreude from reading them. Glad it's you and not me.
Jowenko did something really stupid. He made a decision based on inadequate data. When told, AFTER making his statement that WTC7 was CD, trhat it happened on the same day, he could not explain how it could be done. Weak sauce by the bucketful. So how has this turd managed not to get murdered to shut him up?
This was pointed out in post #41. This reply to post #74 is just handwaving. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/293132-5-videos-put-therm-te-argument-bed-8.html#post1062401038 Could you address the actual issues in this link from my post? http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&page=37&p=4731597&viewfull=1#post4731597 The US government tells Americans that it's defending freedom and democracy in the world. Do you believe it? http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145531 Do you think the media always tell us the truth? http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=chomsky+media&aq=f Do you think that science journals aren't owned? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bAE7FGdNmA (00:16 time mark)
Scott, do you find it odd that such a large amount of unreacted "thermitic" material was found in the dust?
The squibs... http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&g...urce=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=1_pRUdmrMIiRhQeQzIDgBw ...and the fact that the towers fell at near freefall speed prove controlled demolition by themselves. I don't have the science background to talk about the thermite issue but, however they made it fall, they made it fall.
A: there were no 'squibs',because the squbs would fire BEFORE the collapse,not during it B: the towers did NOT fall at 'near freefall speed' C: if you don't have the 'science background',Shut UP!
Glen Stanish is a Christo-facist slimeball and hangs out with the known Nazi fuguitv e from justice Chris Bollyn. He lies an awful lot. That's what Nazis and Christo-fascists do.
They could have programed it to happen any way they wanted as long as it functioned and the squibs could be seen. http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&g...urce=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=1_pRUdmrMIiRhQeQzIDgBw I said "Near-freefall speed". Anyone with two eyes can see it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG7I4UnoBnA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufZPFYOblKk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUdhdTXHcn4 It looks like the preparation can be proven. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ga88UyXTvK4
Shafquat? Seriously? She's nuttier than squirrel crap. You see pieces closer to the ground than to the collapse zone, and that blithering idot calls the collapse progressing at free-fall speed. Stupid. None of these drooling morons has any expertise in the field. Alex Jones is just a loud mouthed rabble rouser with a brain slightly smaller than the Rushblob's. Lindauer is not in jail only because the court determined that she was too psychotic to defend herself. Dumb bimbo doesn't even realize how stupid she makes herself look when she thinks it strange that delivery trucks should arrive after the janitors left and leave before the morning shift started in a shopping mall. Nobody home there. She was not a CIA asset. Are you familiar with the word "delusion?"
Why would the 'squibs' need to be seen if they wanted to cover up their involvement? And I KNOW you said 'near freefall',I repeated that And looks are decieving...there was NO preparation..
Tell us how you're in a position to know this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O7LwySqtr4 1:03:55 time mark.
Because NO evidence of preparation was found! And Marvin Bush was on the board of directors of securacomm,he wasn't the 'head' Do you need EVERYTHING explained to you?
I'm sure it did. Doesn't change the fact that combined they rip the thermite argument to shreds, and you all know it.
this is funny talk about far reaching, the thermite matter is irrelevant, however: The guy is admitting the building was pulverized. So after all these years troughers finally admit the building was pulverized. It does not put any thermite issue to bed but certainly raises 5 more! Nice
I never said thermite pulverized a building. who ever limited it to thermite being the "only" thing used to bring it down
Well the lack of audio signatures is where the 'thermite' fantasy got started. And being as how you were not able to provided any, I assumed thermite was your answer. Regardless, this is not a 'bomb audio' thread, this is a thermite thread, and the thing you keep avoiding is that my 5 videos have ripped the thermite theory to shreds. Unless you care to point out where in the Bentham paper Jones actually finds thermite?
The way the shills would like this to work, is if one can't correctly guess exactly how the crime was perpetrated on 9/11, then it didn't happen. In reality though, all one needs to do is prove the "official" explanations can't possibly be true. (this is also known as the "shill dance"). I could list reason after reason why the "official" BS story can't possibly hold up to scrutiny, and the shills would deny, deny, deny, regardless of the reason highlighted at the time of discussion. When you quit engaging the obvious dancing shill, the shill then accuses one of "dodging" them. How can one ever have an honest discussion or any type of open discussion with a shill? One can't. Any attempt is futile. What one SHOULD ask themselves, is with the obvious attempts to guard the "official" lies by the shills, is why they cannot offer the "proof" (after all this time) that they so vigorously demand themselves, and simply refuse to entertain any possibility that any part the BS story might be BS, and admit the same? Now THAT answer, should be obvious, if nothing else can be. Lots of effort goes into defending the BS by the same old players, year after year, and now decade after decade, with the same old problem areas they refuse to acknowledge. Instead, we get what I call the shill dance. Step back and look for yourself, intelligent reader, and witness the hollowness and the lies on 9/11 on your own. Put two and two together. It shouldn't take more than five minutes to smell a rat in the "official" BS story (if one can get past the hype and the rhetoric of the shill). Don't ignore the obvious.
