Lesbian woman demands double standard when she has sex with 15-year-old

Hopefully not. I won't turn her in for being a girl.

I would beg for the POTUS, who's political alignment is different from myself, to....jump in really quick and have sex with my sister or daughter so that I won't get blamed and have to pay child support.

 

If they had an ongoing, pre-existing sexual relationship prior to turning it would be a horrible law. What is wrong with you people, you're acting like a 40 year old pervert jumped out of the bushes and raped someone. This was two high schoolers in a relationship. Man, something like that has never happened before, has it??

 

the intent of the law is to prevent victimization I understand the need for them they're necessary...

 

the problem is drawing a line in the sand and saying this is the age when you're a pedophile and when you're a child so it's okay...ya obviously 40 is to old but what about 17 or 18, why not 19 or 20? ...kids mature differently some 15 yr olds are mature beyond their years and some 20yr olds are very immature...and not all high school kids are nice, some are predators, some sr boys will think nothing of preying on younger naive girls, I knew more than a few...I also recall from my high school years two girls having a contest to see who could bed the most boys...

 

here we have a two year age separation, at 18(adult) is able to have a relationship with a 16yr old...but I doubt a 19 yr old would get into trouble for being with a 16yr old, some common sense is applied as the situations arise...I agree 14 yr olds shouldn't be with 18yr olds I'd have hard time accepting that...

 

BS. You have not read the thread. Florida has a Romeo and Juliette Statute, and the 18 year old received a generous legal offer. She refused it. Now watch what she gets.

- - - Updated - - -

No, I believe it a 3 1/2 year separation.

Edit in. I misread your post, assigning the wrong designation for "here".

 

Generous offer my ass. A felony conviction at 18 will turn her life upside down. If they go to trial, I predict she gets acquitted.

 

I predict different. We will see.

 

This is the reason why same sex people and their supporters are out of touch with reality this case is about having sex with a minor, a big big shame to the 18 year and heis parents they should be sue for civil damages by the parents of the 14 year old.

Same sex people have launch a petition signing I think supporters of child abuse should launch a petition against child molestation.

 

if there is a guilty verdict the judges hands are tied as to minimum sentence are they not? ...can a jury return a not guilty verdict in face of clear facts/criteria as the law is written?

 

She needs to skip the country.

- - - Updated - - -

Absolutely yes! It's called "jury nullification".

 

So the question, was the 15 year old really victimized and attacked by a predator, or were they just boyfriend and girlfriend who both happened to be 1 year off from being legal (had the younger been 16, or the older been 17). Does that age difference of one year really make the difference between being a sexual predator? That really depends on the context of their relationship.

Is this an example of a "sexual predator"? It might be, I don't know much about the circumstances. But one things which is certain is that cases like this are often not prosecuted because it's considered more damaging for all parties involved than helpful.... the 15 year old girl is probably devastated, the 18 year old girl is equally as devastated and will carry the burdon of a criminal record for the rest of her life, and the State itself is harmed due to the cost of having to prosecute and possibly imprison the girl. Such a decision should not be made unless it's actually determined to be in the best interest of the 15 year old girl. And perhaps it is in her best interest in this case, but that decision is usually left to the district attorney. Most often, cases like this which are ignored and a simple warning is issued that threatens prosecution if the action continues. Actual prosecution is usually reserved for cases where the activity is truly predatory, where the victim is being taken advantage of by a dominant older party and prosecution is necessary for the defense of the person(s) from physical or psychological harm.

Laws are not executed as black and white, interpretation and intent of the law are worked into the system. Still, she looks guilty of the letter of the law.

They kinda already can. The parents can consent their child to marry, legally allowing the child to have sex with their spouse. The history of statutory rape laws are not actually rooted in protecting 15 year olds from having sex, this is already perfectly legal in proper context. More specifically, it's protecting the STATE from the burdon of having to pay welfare expenses for teen mothers and their child conceived out of wedlock. Since it's creation, it has also been used to prosecute cases that could otherwise be prosecuted under Rape laws, but because Statutory Rape is much easier for prosecutors to prove, cases involving minors are usually prosecuted under statutory rape laws.

 

It dont matter, the gay agenda must march on.

 

She thinks she's special because she's a lesbian. Her degenerate parents try and brush it off as "experimentation" as if statutory rape is ok if it's just experimenting. Hetero males get prosecuted for this ALL the time. My best friend was partner's in CA in a karate studio with a guy who served 9 months in prison in CA for having sex with a 15 year old when he was 19 and they started dating in high school when he was 17 and she was 14. But this is supposed to be different. They should send her failure parents to jail along with her.

 

Maybe that would fly in Cali, but this is Florida. You can think what is fair all you want.

 

Its called personal responsibity. Once you are an adult, dont mess with minors.

 

Well, I guess she broke the law. And is expecting people to feel sorry for her based on the fact she's gay/it's dealing with a same-sex relationship. I'd only feel sorry for her if she was being treated differently to a heterosexual couple in an identical situation. Playing the gay card when you've obviously broken the law is unjustifiable.

 

I don't see it as a gay issue but one of mutual consent between two high school students who got tripped up by an age detail, this doesn't seem to be an exploitative relationship...

 

An "age detail" ? !4 year-olds are "unexploitable" ?

Whatchoo smokin Willis !!

 

He (she?) didn't say 14 year olds were "unexploitable". He said it appeared, based on the publicly available information, that this particular relationship was not exploitative. I concur. Though, I will concede there may be information currently unavailable to me that might change my mind.

 

Those of you who want to give the 18 year old a pass are (*)(*)(*)(*)ing ignorant beyond belief. The parents of the younger girl compelled this action, but yet the liberal ignorance in posters here manufactures a lala land of rainbows where 14 year-olds are now to be considered as adults as well, it would seem.

Why couldn't the 14 year-old keep her panties on ? She's all mature, right ?

The older girl is going to jail. Well deserved. We don't incarcerate folks for just being stupid, but damned if she won't be in jail for being stupid, cause they offered that child-molester a good deal, and she and her folks were too stoooopid to take it.

 

14 year old girls date senior boys all the time. When I was a freshmen I had a friend of mine who began dating one of my team mates in football. He was 18 and she was 14, and nobody got arrested or batted an eyelash. If we are going to begin to buckle down on this, we should do so equally and without bias on sexuality.