Got proof that Martin was left-handed? No? Then there is no proof that fat boy was punched in the face. His owies are more consistent with running into a tree. And explain how his blood ran uphill and didn't get smeared on the wet grass. You aint got physical evidence of anything that turd said. The photos argue against his lie about a broken nose. - - - Updated - - - Why do his owies look more like a gun print than like road rash? - - - Updated - - - Want to tell me how fat ass reached his weapon with someone on top of him like that?
i can't believe the state tried to pay for the experts to manufacture evidence against george. i guess when you got nothing you have to lie, cheat and steal.
Martin would have to have gotten up off of Z or moved forward to get it. Moving forward would have made it harder for fat boy to reach the gun. Had he gotten up, he would have been farther from the weapon when the punk fired. I would have to see a re-enactment of that with somebody actually trying to get the weapon before I believe that fairy tale.
Got proof that they did? Got an explanation for how come Z's face looks like he was either punched by a left-handed person wearing a ring or like he ran into a tree? - - - Updated - - - Fat boy's weapon would have been behind Martin's thigh, on the ground, possibly under Z's fat ass. No way he could have reached it with Martin kneeling over him.
Read the judge's order....geez. It doesn't matter what you say about the gun's position. If Trayvon was also going for it he would have had to move to get it. ....get it? Please stop with the memes and silly myths.
"gun print" ? LOL. This is going into uncharted waters. Pheeeeeww!! (high-pitched whistle) He put his hand on it.
There is a lack of injuries that were not self inflicted, whether intentionally, by clopping himself on the head with his gun, or by being stupid and running into a tree. - - - Updated - - - No proof of that. No knuckle marks. No proof that Martin was left-handed. FAIL. - - - Updated - - - No proof of that. No knuckle marks. No proof that Martin was left-handed. FAIL.
There's a HUGE difference between recording the call log...which is necessary for billing purposes, and recording the cell phone tower triangulation on random cell phones for no apparent reason. The second isn't done because the cell phone service provider doesn't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) where you are until you call. There's no need to record that information in real time, and that recording won't be made unless the fool carrying the phone has a special app to do it, and why would anyone want to do that, especially a thug like Trayvon Martin?
Got any proof that Zimmerman's injuries were self-inflicted? No, of course you don't, because that doesn't make any sense. Here's an idea you people can try to recover someday....it's called "reasonable doubt". And there's no way to remove reasonable doubt in any honest trial of Zimmerman.
"Knuckle marks" ? "left-handed" ? LOL. EARTH TO LEFTYSERGEANT: I grew up in 2 tough neighborhoods in New York City. I've seen plenty of fist fights, and been in a few myself. You can puch somebody a dozen times and not have a single "Knuckle mark" ANd left-handed ? What the hell does that have to do with anything ? A victim's bruises can be anywhere on his face, no matter whether the puncher is right or left handed. More relevant than that is which direction the victim faces, while being punched. For example >>> No matter what handed the puncher is, if the victim turns his face leftward, his injuries will be on the right side of his face (and center). I repeat >> The explanation is that he was punched by Trayvon Martin.
Wrong. I am not stretching. There is no way that that fat little punk could have drawn his weapon with Martin straddling him. Doesn't really matter, though. He had no right to pull it without trying to tell Martin that he was not a boy bumper and that the cops were en route. Under SYG, Martin had the right to take the gun away and keep it away from the slob, even if it meant killing the sorry punk.
location data, like email data, can be deleted locally, but it's also stored in the server, all one needs to do is request it
could that be what started it all, Martin saw some guy that he had earlier seen following him in a car, saw the gun, feared for his life and reacted? if he was going for the gun, then he must of seen the gun .
As large as Martin's hands were, not likely. If you are looking at a person and talking smack to him, how does your face get turned to the left? Not a bit of it. You still have to deal with six lacerations oriented in the same direction as the owie on his beak. You still have to deal with the fact that there is no photographic evidence that the slob's nose was broken.
what is actually known about that? george said that trayvon saw the gun during the struggle when his jacket slid up. the defense confirmed that was possible by having the first officer on the scene describe how he took the gun from george. other than that there os zero proof that trayvon saw the gun before that. until there is proof making that claim is useless.
Which perfectly matches the requirements of SYG. He was being followed by some "creepy azz cracka" who looked like a boy bumper. Obviously, he had reason to fear death or buggery. That the SOB was armed means that the only way to defend himself was to take the gun away, maybe even to shoot him with it. Z was wrong on every level, and Martin had a clear right under SYG to hurt the slob.