1. Again, you don't have a standard you judge from the hip, which is why you're inconsistent. 2. Absolutely moot. A person doesn't need to be followed to FEEL threatened. 3. And, as always, you're trying to be as vague as possible. You're like the Greek philosopher who said many words with little meaning or value. You, again, haven't answered the question and, again, you're trying to ignore the point I made - anyone can FEEL threatened without any imminent threat of danger actually being present. The standard of 'feel', again, the standard you hint at, would justify both Zimmerman and Trayvon in their actions, as they both took hostile action when they 'felt' threatened, but Zimmernan's own act of following wasn't inherently hostile nor does any of the evidence suggest it was actually with hostile intent, no matter how it made Trayvon's tummy feel.
Not really, pretty much no connection whatsoever. And there's no reason for blank/blank, it was one swear word that "@hole" usually suffices for. Try making an actual argument, rather than loopy hints.
Anybody with a first grade education can interpret what the dispatcher inferred. Pssst...and it wasn't "Go chase him down". But he did anyway, cause he was hunting black people that night.
and, again, you have to be reminded that you (for selfish reasons) have admitted you would ignore a direct order from the police, and also that a 911 dispatcher isn't an authority, just a civilian operator the same as someone on the World of Warcraft hotline: not an authority that must be obeyed.
I may have ignored such an order but I wouldn't have stalked and killed a defenseless man, without announcing who I was. Zimmerman clearly wanted the element of surprise so he could satisfy his lust for killing a black.
oh, good, cause that's completely irrelevant since Zimmerman didn't do that. Do you need to be reminded further of the facts?
To your blinded view of the event, perhaps. The jurors will see what Zimmerman's lies and his obsession of playing rent-a-cop will mean.
anybody that wants to assume to fit what they believe would say that but the facts show otherwise. there is zero proof that george continued to follow trayvon after he told the dispatcher "OK". or maybe you don't know that he said ok.
Honestly, even if Zimmerman did walk towards Trayvon, what kind of a panzy gets scared over non-aggressive verbal communication. When people on the street come towards me and start asking questions or otherwise communicating with me i dont freak out and attempt to murder them due to a paranoid belief that language is life threatening, I simply reply to their statements or questions.
So why didn't George respond to Trayvon's question? George had done this before.. demanded to know who someone was and what they were doing but refused to identify himself. It was in the day time ..and he said " I am the man who asks the questions."
You can get your little "justice" for Obama's dead lookalike son. Meanwhile, Hispanics in black ghettos will continue to do the will of White Nationalist movements and purify these communities.
And you wont say a damn thing about it. They are doing it now, and you care still just about this one dead black dude.
The blank/blank is a great beginning for a fever pitched rage attack for someone if the right combinations fall in place.
Call it self-defense if you want, but we citizens are still free to walk the streets without having to worry about looking 'suspicious' to some Paul Blart cop with a gun. Your boy is going down.
What he is talking about is, he wishes they would be bring back the old South Georgia McIntosh County days where you hung-em before you tried em.
Yes. A lot of (clever) people communicate thoughts like that about African Americans; they think people cannot detect such sentiments. Like fools, their commentary leaves them unaware of their sickening nakedness. It's pitiful.