Can I convince PF's resident 'Truthers' that AA77 hit the Pentagon? - Take Two

What the hell is that and what has it to do with the topic?

And where is that rebar on the lawn?

 

a pole that did not break

 

read my previous posts

 

How about you make a coherent claim rather than attempting to post nonsensical statements that hve no bearing the fact that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.

 

Your previous posts add up to a small pile of bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You seem to only want to apply science when YOU feel it proves you postion.

 

Is it OK if I help?

I think it goes about like this:

It is believed that lamp poles were knocked down by an airliner.
If an airliner hit lamp poles, it would have been destroyed before it hit the Pentagon.
Therefore, there was no airliner.

Do you have corrections or clarifications to offer, or is this indeed what you claim, in the matter of the posts?

 

which statement is that?

what fact?

- - - Updated - - -

which statement?

always apply science, sorry it does not support your postion!

 

Then, of course, he would need to prove the people who witnessed the plane clip the light poles and the people who witnessed the plane crash into the Pentagon to be lying.

Occams Razor...it's not something you shave with.

 

destroyed is a little harsh dont you think?

I have no idea if there was an airliner or not, just there was not an airliner took out the poles from the evidence presented.

Here is a nice one chomp chomp!






theres a sneak in personnel!

[video=youtube;7rWuc5kar3Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rWuc5kar3Y[/video]

 

How does an airplane traveling at 500+mph not knock down 400lbs light poles? How is the science wrong? How is your claim actually relevent to the FACT flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.

Here, let me save you brain cells, it doesn't.

- - - Updated - - -

Then what is your explantion for the eyewitnesses. Do you even attempt to apply logic to your reasoning?

 

how many do you want? they are on sale this week! LMAO

look at the above post, its pentagon MULCHING light pole mower.

 

You can make all the claims you wish based on your pseudo-reasoning but, you can't explain away the eyewitnesses.

 

Typical. Can't meet the burden of your claim so, you make up another. What witnesses were bought?

Do you just keep making up (*)(*)(*)(*) as you need? Thanks for proving you really have nothing to offer.

Oh, and why your making (*)(*)(*)(*)...how come a pumpkin can penetrate both sides of a boat but, a plane can't penetrate the side of a building? What "under certain condition" don't apply. Still waiting.

 

Whats the going rate for eyewitnesses now days?

dont forget to add in cost of living increases since 911.

 

Of course you would, you have already shown you have no integrity.

So, now you're claim is...witnesses were bought. What's your proof?

Maybe it was HAARP....and I'm sure you have just as much proof for that also.


YOU'RE DONE.

 

you claim they were not bought,

prove it

Didnt like that pic huh? LMAO

sorta proves they were!

I'm just getting started

 

which claim is that?

 

wow...you have absolutely no credibility.

You claim there were "bought"...you carry the burden of proof. But then you know that, you just can't meet the burden of proof for any of your claims.

Just getting started??? You were done days ago....you just don't realize it.

 

which statement?

what fact?

 

when the testimony does not confirm the material facts, yeh they are not credible.






maybe they were just the newfangled delayed drop version?

 

Lets see your logic at work......

A fake....something crashes into the Pentagon...people, dwarfs, leprechauns....invisible, of course, drive up the highway....and in front of everyone, keep in mind they are invisible....jump out and knock down light poles....twist them up, snap them in multiple places...bouce them off cars, still in fully cloaked mode....flash the memories all blank and then implant the new story that a plane knock down the poles and crashed into the Pentagon.

Then they drove to the Pentagon to drop off all the plane and body parts.

Gotcha.

 

LOL thats hilarious!

No my logic is that we seen this:




when we should have seen this:








and this


.

 

Where is anyone making the statement that no damage was dont to the plane? Show me where your claims are relevent to the fact the plane crashed into the Pentagon?

Or, are you unable to do that? Rhetorical question.

 

where is the shredded wing tips?


let play hunt the flaming aircraft!



Nope no flaming aircraft over here

 

You're just like 7-11, exactly what do you see in the video? how do you know the plane is not damaged? You can tell from the video clip? Superhuman vision?

got any more bogus claims you want to make?